Liberal Forum

Skans » 19 Jan 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:43 pm

Depends on the location of the person experiencing 120 minutes and the person experiencing 70-80 minutes, and how bad traffic is on the cosmic freeway.

   

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm

Well all know that 120 minutes is greater than 70-80 minutes which means you are incorrect to say I watch 2 hours of programming on FOX each day more than I read.  And the two shows you got your panties in a twist over are not news shows.  On is late comedy and the other is an opinion show. 

This was explained to you but you chose to ignore that by lining it out.  You lose.  And no greenies for you.  You are welcome for the quick tutorial. 

The discussion on primary sources is over forever.

This is about you subtracting commercials?

Add back fox promos & political ads, as well as the time you spend "reading" the NYPost.

Subtract the time you spend reading the sports pages.

So we have what?

10 minutes with wavy?
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:53 pm

This is about you subtracting commercials?

Add back fox promos & political ads, as well as the time you spend "reading" the NYPost.

Subtract the time you spend reading the sports pages.

So we have what?

10 minutes with wavy?

LMAO!  I don't watch promos or political ads.  I fast forward thru all of that ****.  Takes about 2 second.  You would have known that if you had read the replies I gave you instead of lining them out.  

I also notice you are trying to change the conditions at every turn when you are smacked down.  



You are so behind the curve when it comes to technology it is amazing that you can even log on and post.  I remember when it took yhou six months to a year to figure out how to use the WYSIWYG tools.  

 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 3:04 pm

LMAO!  I don't watch promos or political ads.  I fast forward thru all of that ****.  Takes about 2 second.  You would have known that if you had read the replies I gave you instead of lining them out.  

I also notice you are trying to change the conditions at every turn when you are smacked down.  

You are so behind the curve when it comes to technology it is amazing that you can even log on and post.  I remember when it took yhou six months to a year to figure out how to use the WYSIWYG tools.

The diversions are all yours....

Name the source with which you spend more than 70 minutes per day...

Either there is one (and it has a name), or there isn't.


Cake
 

ROG62 » 19 Jan 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 12:36 pm

 is he having a short bus window licker moment?

 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:11 pm

We clearly have a different idea of what constitutes losing...

Like Hilly lost to Putin?  


 
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 3:34 pm

The diversions are all yours....

Name the source with which you spend more than 70 minutes per day...

Either there is one (and it has a name), or there isn't.


Cake
 

 

It is in the posts that you lined out.  This conversation is over for all time. 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:47 pm

Not this again.

VF has, roughly, the same circulation as the viewership of FOX, though more skewed to people with teeth, who can read....its parent, Conde Nast, makes about 1.75 billion a year...

There is about zero chance that Grifty was unaware of the movie, and only slightly larger chance that he was unaware of the VF mention.

Were that not he in the photo, he would sue Conde Nast, the author AND the named photographer.

But you don't even have a correction.

Bla blah blah....

The pictures don't lie.


 Your *** boy on the Vanity Fair Society page picture is too short to be Trump.

You're still losing.

 
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 4:52 pm

Bla blah blah....

The pictures don't lie.


 Your *** boy on the Vanity Fair Society page picture is too short to be Trump.

You're still losing.

Deny all you want...

Wait for the correction.

What's another 5 years...
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 5:01 pm

Deny all you want...

Wait for the correction.

What's another 5 years...

I'm not the one denying... you are.

You have yet to provide and substantial argument against what these two pictures prove...


 
... which is that the guy with Roy Cohn in the bottom picture is too short to be Donald Trump, as evidenced by a photo of Trump with Cohn in the top picture taken in the same time period.

All one has to do is compare the shoulder height.

Nod

 
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 5:30 pm

I'm not the one denying... you are.

You have yet to provide and substantial argument against what these two pictures prove...


 
... which is that the guy with Roy Cohn in the bottom picture is too short to be Donald Trump, as evidenced by a photo of Trump with Cohn in the top picture taken in the same time period.

All one has to do is compare the shoulder height.

Nod

They don't "prove" anything.

I don't have to...the photo is captioned.

 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 6:22 pm

They don't "prove" anything.

I don't have to...the photo is captioned.

The problem is we can find only two sources for your jack off pic.  One captions it calling the not Donald Trump Donald Trump.

The other source only uses the caption to say it is Roy Cohn.

The guy in your pic is probably your height.  5"9 or so.  Roy Cohn is 5'8".  The pic you just reposted shows a man well over 6 foot standing over Cohn.  That is what it would like if Trump stood next to you.

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 6:42 pm

The problem is we can find only two sources for your jack off pic.  One captions it calling the not Donald Trump Donald Trump.

The other source only uses the caption to say it is Roy Cohn.

The guy in your pic is probably your height.  5"9 or so.  Roy Cohn is 5'8".  The pic you just reposted shows a man well over 6 foot standing over Cohn.  That is what it would like if Trump stood next to you.

I'm not the one with an inexplicable crush on the fruit in the toilet brush hat....
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 6:44 pm

I'm not the one with an inexplicable crush on the fruit in the toilet brush hat....

The problem is we can find only two sources for your jack off pic.  One captions it calling the not Donald Trump Donald Trump.

The other source only uses the caption to say it is Roy Cohn.

The guy in your pic is probably your height.  5"9 or so.  Roy Cohn is 5'8".  The pic you just reposted shows a man well over 6 foot standing over Cohn.  That is what it would like if Trump stood next to you.

You got your *** severely beaten today because of your use of strike thru.  

I have no clue who the guy that runs you on is.  I am into women.  Which I can define.  You can't.  No BV, that is not a women.
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 6:44 pm

I'm not the one with an inexplicable crush on the fruit in the toilet brush hat....

I have no clue who the fruit in the toilet brush hat even is, but I know one thing for certain... it ain't Donald Trump.

I also know that you've been had, and can't bring yourself to admit it.


 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 6:44 pm

I'm not the one with an inexplicable crush on the fruit in the toilet brush hat....

I’m out.  But I will leave with this.  Does Tavy find it kinky when you jack off to not Donald Trump before he his way with you?  

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 7:01 pm

I have no clue who the fruit in the toilet brush hat even is, but I know one thing for certain... it ain't Donald Trump.

I also know that you've been had, and can't bring yourself to admit it.

Whoever he is, he's totally got Trump's mom's arms


 
 
 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 7:04 pm

I’m out.  But I will leave with this.  Does Tavy find it kinky when you jack off to not Donald Trump before he his way with you?

You seem obsessed with my tumescence...

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 7:37 pm

Whoever he is, he's totally got Trump's mom's arms

More of your "proof"?

What color are her eyes I wonder?

She's pretty tall too... I would say 5'11" or maybe even 6'. Taller that you for sure.

 
 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm

Well all know that 120 minutes is greater than 70-80 minutes which means you are incorrect to say I watch 2 hours of programming on FOX each day more than I read.  And the two shows you got your panties in a twist over are not news shows.  On is late comedy and the other is an opinion show. 

This was explained to you but you chose to ignore that by lining it out.  You lose.  And no greenies for you.  You are welcome for the quick tutorial. 

The discussion on primary sources is over forever.

You say something about no numbers?  You lied. 

Damn, this is quite the regular diversion for you.