Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 05 Dec 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 3:37 pm

Easy!  And first off, you're under a liberal delusion if you think that idiotic poll about Trump and Buchanan you've used for years is in any way accurate.  It's ****, and everyone but you, apparently, knows that!

But to answer your question, (something you rarely do) the top 3 reasons (and there are MANY more) are:
1) Closing the border and deporting millions of illegals.
 2) Opening up more lands for drilling and fracking, including ANWR, off-shore and on federal lands while eliminating the pile of new fees and regulations that Biden piled on to the oil industry which inflated gas and heating oil prices, and restarting construction on the Keystone pipeline .
3) Ending the war in Ukraine and stopping the billions of taxpayer dollars going to feed Zelensky's corruption.
4) (In case you can't count to 3) Keeping the Trump tax cuts from expiring in January, which Kamaltoe would not promise to do.

That enough for an ignorant Eggplant?

1) Closing the border and deporting millions of illegals.

Ignoring the fact that it is economically unsupportable, how does grifty propose to pay for that?

 2) Opening up more lands for drilling and fracking, including ANWR, off-shore and on federal lands while eliminating the pile of new fees and regulations that Biden piled on to the oil industry which inflated gas and heating oil prices, and restarting construction on the Keystone pipeline .

Breakeven in the Arctic is 75/bbl..

Unless someone will sell it at a loss, how will that lower the retail price of gas?

while eliminating the pile of new fees

After the increase royalties on federal lands will remain LOWER than royalties charged by private landowners.

3) Ending the war in Ukraine and stopping the billions of taxpayer dollars going to feed Zelensky's corruption

Link, Useful?


Zeet,

You're an idiot who believes what he hears on the radio.

ROG62 » 05 Dec 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 6:34 pm

no "feefees", brown...FACT!

Straight up uninformed feefees.


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 6:49 pm

Ignoring the fact that it is economically unsupportable, how does grifty propose to pay for that?

Breakeven in the Arctic is 75/bbl..

Unless someone will sell it at a loss, how will that lower the retail price of gas?

After the increase royalties on federal lands will remain LOWER than royalties charged by private landowners.

Link, Useful?

Zeet,

You're an idiot who believes what he hears on the radio.

Simple, nitwit!
We'll use the money that it's been costing us to feed, house, and clothe the millions of illegals we're now paying for.  Trump can use the money being spent to fly illegals in from Venezuela and the money we spend on giving illegals free travel across the US.  Illegals should not be getting free healthcare or their kids getting a free education.  They could easily be rounded up at hospitals and schools and send back across the border.  There is no reason in the world to give them free debit cards every month, nor to house them in hotels giving them free room service and free smartphone use. 
Whatever the cost to remove them is short term and will easily cost us less than continuing to pay for them to remain here.

Secondly, the breakeven point for Alaskan oil is high only because the idiot YOU helped stick us with added new regulations, new fees, new limits on where drilling can be done, and then suspended Alaskan oil leases a few months after Biden took office.
Idiots like you know nothing about the oil industry.  If it wasn't profitable to do so, they wouldn't be eager to buy the leases when they're put up for auction.  And since the $8 billion-dollar Alaskan pipeline was finished in 1977, we've gotten over 18 billion barrels of oil from Alaska, and the oil-rich area known as ANWR has not yet even been touched.  

So moron, do you think Conoco-Philips among others have been losing money for the past 47 years for their drilling in Alaska?
This is just another one of your ignorant pouts over losing in a landslide to the president you've spent hating for over 10 years.
But here's the kicker.
Just think if you stupid Democrats didn't cheat and fraudulently elect Biden in 2020, TRUMP WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF OFFICE IN LESS THAN 50 DAYS, but now you've got over 4 more years to suffer, whine, and complain about him!

Enjoy it, dickhead!          


 

Zeets2 » 06 Dec 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 11:30 am

Simple, nitwit!
We'll use the money that it's been costing us to feed, house, and clothe the millions of illegals we're now paying for.  Trump can use the money being spent to fly illegals in from Venezuela and the money we spend on giving illegals free travel across the US.  Illegals should not be getting free healthcare or their kids getting a free education.  They could easily be rounded up at hospitals and schools and send back across the border.  There is no reason in the world to give them free debit cards every month, nor to house them in hotels giving them free room service and free smartphone use. 
Whatever the cost to remove them is short term and will easily cost us less than continuing to pay for them to remain here.

Secondly, the breakeven point for Alaskan oil is high only because the idiot YOU helped stick us with added new regulations, new fees, new limits on where drilling can be done, and then suspended Alaskan oil leases a few months after Biden took office.
Idiots like you know nothing about the oil industry.  If it wasn't profitable to do so, they wouldn't be eager to buy the leases when they're put up for auction.  And since the $8 billion-dollar Alaskan pipeline was finished in 1977, we've gotten over 18 billion barrels of oil from Alaska, and the oil-rich area known as ANWR has not yet even been touched.  

So moron, do you think Conoco-Philips among others have been losing money for the past 47 years for their drilling in Alaska?
This is just another one of your ignorant pouts over losing in a landslide to the president you've spent hating for over 10 years.
But here's the kicker.
Just think if you stupid Democrats didn't cheat and fraudulently elect Biden in 2020, TRUMP WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF OFFICE IN LESS THAN 50 DAYS, but now you've got over 4 more years to suffer, whine, and complain about him!

Enjoy it, dickhead!        

Whatever the cost to remove them is short term and will easily cost us less than continuing to pay for them to remain here.

Yea....whatever...

Secondly, the breakeven point for Alaskan oil is high only because the idiot YOU helped stick us with added new regulations, new fees, new limits on where drilling can be done, and then suspended Alaskan oil leases a few months after Biden took office.

.

But the biggest hurdle is the staggering costs of drilling in a brand-new area where equipment, manpower and electricity would all need to be brought in.

 "ANWR could be a very expensive zone to start in. It has little infrastructure," Per Magnus, head of analysis at Rystad Energy, told CNN Business.

Unless a "massive discovery" happens, Magnus said that breakeven costs could be around $80 to $85 a barrel. That's roughly double the breakeven levels in the low-cost Permian Basin

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/18/business ... index.html

Post the date of that article, DumbassStreamofBullzeet.
 

Idiots like you know nothing about the oil industry

:die:  

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 11:44 am

Yea....whatever...

But the biggest hurdle is the staggering costs of drilling in a brand-new area where equipment, manpower and electricity would all need to be brought in.

 "ANWR could be a very expensive zone to start in. It has little infrastructure," Per Magnus, head of analysis at Rystad Energy, told CNN Business.

Unless a "massive discovery" happens, Magnus said that breakeven costs could be around $80 to $85 a barrel. That's roughly double the breakeven levels in the low-cost Permian Basin

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/18/business ... index.html

Post the date of that article, DumbassStreamofBullzeet.

So let's see if you've got the balls to take a stand on your moronic position today, and answer a very simple question.
Based on YOUR acceptance of the lying scumbags at CNN who all hate Trump, are you claiming that the oil companies WILL NOT DRILL IN ALASKA once Trump removes all the fees, regulations, and obstacles that your demented Alzheimer's patient put in place?  Or that they won't be drilling and fracking there unless oil prices rise to $100 a barrel or higher?

Defend your position now, you dickless cretin!

 

Zeets2 » 06 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm

So let's see if you've got the balls to take a stand on your moronic position today, and answer a very simple question.
Based on YOUR acceptance of the lying scumbags at CNN who all hate Trump, are you claiming that the oil companies WILL NOT DRILL IN ALASKA once Trump removes all the fees, regulations, and obstacles that your demented Alzheimer's patient put in place?  Or that they won't be drilling and fracking there unless oil prices rise to $100 a barrel or higher?

Defend your position now, you dickless cretin!

Zeet,

Post the date of the citation, without any further bullzeet.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 3:23 pm

Zeet,

Post the date of the citation, without any further bullzeet.

More irrelevant ****, and I don't work for you, ****!
Prove you've got the balls to support your idiotic claim or stop wasting everybody's time and admit what a clueless buffoon you truly are!
Do you believe the oil production companies will again be drilling in Alaska under Trump or are you going to stick with the lies that CNN and MSNBC tell you to parrot?
 

Zeets2 » 06 Dec 2024, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 4:12 pm

More irrelevant ****, and I don't work for you, ****!
Prove you've got the balls to support your idiotic claim or stop wasting everybody's time and admit what a clueless buffoon you truly are!
Do you believe the oil production companies will again be drilling in Alaska under Trump or are you going to stick with the lies that CNN and MSNBC tell you to parrot?

Zeet, you stupid ****.

Answer the question.

Let’s see if you can learn.

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm

Zeet, you stupid ****.

Answer the question.

Let’s see if you can learn.

That's the funny thing about arguing on the internet with a jackass like you......you would have had your teeth knocked out several times in real situations. 

RebelGator » 06 Dec 2024, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 6:50 pm

That's the funny thing about arguing on the internet with a jackass like you......you would have had your teeth knocked out several times in real situations.

That's another funny thing....triple chinned crackers think they're badasses.

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm

Zeet, you stupid ****.

Answer the question.

Let’s see if you can learn.

Is English your second language?
Or did you fail that too, along with Economics 101?
I don't do your searching for you.  Haven't I made that perfectly clear over the last 5 years?
If you think you've got a point to make, spit it out, Dumbo!  Otherwise, go **** yourself with alacrity!

You're the sissy snowflake who posts an incredibly idiotic source, claiming that oil producers don't want to drill in Alaska, but you're too much of a **** liberal to admit how ridiculous it is, or you wouldn't be so afraid to admit you believe it!

 

Zeets2 » 07 Dec 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:06 am

Is English your second language?
Or did you fail that too, along with Economics 101?
I don't do your searching for you.  Haven't I made that perfectly clear over the last 5 years?
If you think you've got a point to make, spit it out, Dumbo!  Otherwise, go **** yourself with alacrity!

You're the sissy snowflake who posts an incredibly idiotic source, claiming that oil producers don't want to drill in Alaska, but you're too much of a **** liberal to admit how ridiculous it is, or you wouldn't be so afraid to admit you believe it!

This is what a moron you are.

You haven't been asked to search ANYTHING.

You've been asked to confirm the date of the citation provided to you. If you are too stupid to figure out how to do so, I'll tell you how.

 

BV is the biggest moron here

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:10 am

This is what a moron you are.

You haven't been asked to search ANYTHING.

You've been asked to confirm the date of the citation provided to you. If you are too stupid to figure out how to do so, I'll tell you how.

What gives you the hubris to think I'd bother to examine your idiotic posts?
I don't give a **** about your childish demands and never have!

You're just a ****** who is afraid to stick your liberal neck out despite knowing damn well how absurd the **** you post really is!
No matter.
I'll simply wait until we see Trump remove all those restrictions and regulations from oil companies who want to drill in Alaska and the millions we'll reap from the auction, and shove those facts up your dumb Eggplant ***!
 

Zeets2 » 07 Dec 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:20 am

What gives you the hubris to think I'd bother to examine your idiotic posts?
I don't give a **** about your childish demands and never have!

You're just a ****** who is afraid to stick your liberal neck out despite knowing damn well how absurd the **** you post really is!
No matter.
I'll simply wait until we see Trump remove all those restrictions and regulations from oil companies who want to drill in Alaska and the millions we'll reap from the auction, and shove those facts up your dumb Eggplant ***!

Never mind the StreamofBullZeet,

Just do it so we may proceed with your flensing.

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:23 am

Never mind the StreamofBullZeet,

Just do it so we may proceed with your flensing.

Do you need me to translate it into Ebonics for you, moron?
I DON'T DO YOUR ERRANDS!

So if you want to prove you've actually got testicles, tell us that you believe that oil companies won't be drilling in Alaska because it's too expensive, just like your article claimed.

What's the problem? 
Afraid you'll look even dumber that everyone knows you are already?
 

Zeets2 » 07 Dec 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:32 am

Do you need me to translate it into Ebonics for you, moron?
I DON'T DO YOUR ERRANDS!

So if you want to prove you've actually got testicles, tell us that you believe that oil companies won't be drilling in Alaska because it's too expensive, just like your article claimed.

What's the problem? 
Afraid you'll look even dumber that everyone knows you are already?

Shhhhhh....

August, 2020...

Who was NOT POTUS in 2020?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 6:51 pm

Straight up uninformed feefees.

Agreed...yours top the pile of the uninformed...
 

ROG62 » 07 Dec 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:49 am

Agreed...yours top the pile of the uninformed...

You're cringing watching me flense @Zeets , aren't you...
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 9:54 am

You're cringing watching me flense @Zeets , aren't you...

No actually...but I am enjoying the pantydance you're putting on...but here's a tip...don't quit your day job...