Z09 » 22 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You admitted to watching MSNBC and then reading NY Times and Washington Post..
Explains everything
You should be. Your article is like asking the fox how to protect the hen house, retard.R.Suave » 22 Jan 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ A conceit afforded by the fact that I'm not too ashamed to name my sources...
That's what I said, retard.
Post your words, Imbecile.
Hole,Z09 » 22 Jan 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I watched the other day...
They had this segment on all the lies the media told...
NY Times and Washington Post were mentioned
Mostly MSNBC
He didn't read the footnotes, I know because I did. More liberal think tanks and academics.
The question you've been asked to answer for weeks now, Hole...
Cedar » 22 Jan 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I answered every one of his questions, I can't help he didn't like the answer.
It's already there for everyone to see.
Take the L and run along.
With my eyes... duh.
Just following your lead.
You're not equipped for that task.
Z09 » 22 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you tell us how many hours do you watch MSNBC in a day?
Also..
Do you record and go back and watch a second time?
Because posting a random picture of a ski lift when someone asks you if your okay is not weird.
Your post was a fallacy of unwarranted assumption. The L is yours.
I've listed my sources...MSNBC is not on the list.
No, Cheddy....leave that ******* **** to. @VegasCedar » 22 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Your post was a fallacy of unwarranted assumption. The L is yours.
**chuckle**