Because no one on Earth should have their lives affected by what cretins define as "biology"EDC4ALL! » 23 Jan 2024, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. Real science. Why would you possibly think it's ok for a biological man with a mental disease, to disguise themselves as a woman, and go into a Biological womens bathroom?
Actually, since only one of my adventures involved an exchange of cash, my history suggests that I understand "woman" instinctively..Huey » 23 Jan 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Common sense says in public restrooms that children can access it is everyone's business. Plus, you are disqualified from this conversation because you can define "woman".
It's not about science...
That POS beevee - now rick O'Swave - used to deny it was happening while arguing against prohibiting it from happening.RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2024, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑ This is one of the best examples of "upside down" mentality that one can show...
The "progressives" have this issue so out of whack that they call not allowing mentally ill men dressed like women into women's locker rooms and bathrooms "extreme"... which in turn means that allowing such **** is "normal" to them.
Remember that it wasn't long ago that these nutjobs said this **** wasn't happening, and my question is... if it's not happening, then why are you so against legislation that prevents it in the first place?
**** unrealCannonpointer » 23 Jan 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ That POS beevee - now rick O'Swave - used to deny it was happening while arguing against prohibiting it from happening.
Would you have ANTI-science legislated?R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Legislated science....
Great!
You should consider killing yourself, moron.
Which amendment covers bathroom rights again?R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not about science...
It's about rights afforded ALL under da Konstitoooooooshn
No, ***. Common sense says it is EVERY man's business.
Agreed...the Mohawk was a classic....Z09 » 23 Jan 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Without question!
They have little self esteem and this way they get attention...
Kinda like those people that color their hair 10 different colors

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom No...it isn't.ConsRule » 23 Jan 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ No...it isn't.
Science contains the FACT that the male/female determination is based on the chromosomes of a person. Science contains the FACT that the chromosomal makeup of a person cannot be changed. It is impossible for a male to transition to a female, and vice versa. Why don't you believe in science? (FYI...that is a question directed to you)
No matter how much a person spends on changing their hair style, purchasing makeup, buying clothes, getting the nails done and/or mutilating their body, "Frank" will never really be a "Francis" and "Jennifer" will never really be "Jerry".
There is no requirement that anyone, or any government entity, has to support, promote, endorse, and/or participate in the fantasy life someone chooses to live.
please don't presume...Science contains the FACT that the male/female determination is based on the chromosomes of a person
then I guess you're owed a response...Why don't you believe in science? (FYI...that is a question directed to you)
let's consider the "principle"There is no requirement that anyone, or any government entity, has to support, promote, endorse, and/or participate in the fantasy life someone chooses to live
and the sad part is Gayle king and company ate it up hook, line and sinker bobble headed style...impartialobserver » 23 Jan 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Well.. on that note, going to get back to work. That is funny as hell. I would say that she has a pretty good life.. one instance may not have been pleasant. I had my appendix rupture in high school. I was back to school in 4 days and went back to work in 10 days. At the moment, I thought it was the worst day of my life. Having recently had gallstones.. yeah, appendix is pretty tame stuff.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom It seems that line has been drawn in the sand...Skans » 23 Jan 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL - that's right! Perverts are gonna be perverts. People can enable them, or brutalize them. Society's choice.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom So why are you yapping, 'Tweener?Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2024, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ***. Common sense says it is EVERY man's business.
Protecting women is in the DNA of heterosexual men.
Your DNA seems to be missing that - I will let others decide for themselves what that indicate.
Whooooooaa...ROG62 » 23 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑ and the sad part is Gayle king and company ate it up hook, line and sinker bobble headed style...
Annnnd... my point stands.R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Hold on...
Leave my kids, real or imagined, out of this, coward.
Let's make the trans YOUR kid...
But to address your point
1) your son has to face that danger every day. Some Republican Senator might sneak into the stall beside him and establish a wide stance.
2) From the sounds of it, you'd be delighted if it's just some Republican ex-POTUS, who colors his hair, wears makeup and feels entitled to grab pussies because his dad ripped off taxpayers for enormous sums of money.
**** you, you piece of ****. You presume to put the children of others in ACTUAL DANGER, and you have the effrontery and the lack of self-awareness to mealy mouth about yours being REFERRED TO? **** you, you little punk.R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Hold on...
Leave my kids, real or imagined, out of this, coward.
Let's not, *** - he is not a gas-lighting attention whore exhibiting Munchausen by Proxy.
And transferring the danger to his daughter makes sense in gayworld how, fruitcake?R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑But to address your point
1) your son has to face that danger every day. Some Republican Senator might sneak into the stall beside him and establish a wide stance.
And YOU would give that orange monster a LEGAL EXCLUSION TO ENTER WOMEN'S SEX-SEGREGATED SAFE SPACES, because no one except HIM can declare his gender, you stupid ****.R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑2) From the sounds of it, you'd be delighted if it's just some Republican ex-POTUS, who colors his hair, wears makeup and feels entitled to grab pussies because his dad ripped off taxpayers for enormous sums of money.
who?R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Whooooooaa...
Did you just reference Gayle King?
I guess we know who controls the remote at your place of lodging...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yeah well... that chomo thinks theseCannonpointer » 23 Jan 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ That POS beevee - now rick O'Swave - used to deny it was happening while arguing against prohibiting it from happening.

Bill of Rights.
Are these your words?
and the sad part is Gayle king