7.Skans » 24 Jan 2024, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ There's no battle. I don't pretend to be bright. Answer this....
Definitely wrong.
It's not stupid because it triggers you.
See that sharp drop off in the beginning? Should remind you of...
You'll regret those words...
Do you remember in 2020, Grifty's (as you like to say) supporters had a meltdown when the market crashed?
should but doesn't...post something legible....LowIQTrash » 24 Jan 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ See that sharp drop off in the beginning? Should remind you of...
LowIQTrash » 24 Jan 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you remember in 2020, Grifty's (as you like to say) supporters had a meltdown when the market crashed?
And you were quite elated if I recall...
Good news for you as you will get to relive experience soon.
Or maybe it's not good to you because that means he wins the election...but such are the wages of schadenfreude
LowIQTrash » 24 Jan 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you remember in 2020, Grifty's (as you like to say) supporters had a meltdown when the market crashed?
And you were quite elated if I recall...
Good news for you as you will get to relive experience soon.
Or maybe it's not good to you because that means he wins the election...but such are the wages of schadenfreude
It was a bennie...my "elation" had more to do with shaking out the "Fed Put Premium", and affording me a buying opportunity, than it was about my pleasure at seeing my confidence in the Wages of Supply Side Idiocy validated.And you were quite elated if I recall...
The Bear bet, for axiomatic reasons is tough to sustain. I don't bet it.Good news for you as you will get to relive experience soon.
Too old to fret about what I can't change, but should a major reversal lead to a return of Grifty, the aftermath would be much worse..Or maybe it's not good to you because that means he wins the election...but such are the wages of schadenfreude
nod..
abide...
We shall see...for now I think I'll go all in on 6 mo calls and slowly swap to TLT (which performed rather admirably during Feb-March 2020)R.Suave » 24 Jan 2024, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The Bear bet, for axiomatic reasons is tough to sustain. I don't bet it.
what it shows me is my investments went up by 60% once everyone realized the LW media hype about the world economy collapsing if Trump was elected.
I knew that...Skans » 24 Jan 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Definitely wrong.
The top left 16 boxes would be: 1abcd,2ad,3abc,4d,5,6b,7c,8,9c,10,11c,12,13,14,15, 16b
- 1,2,3,4,5,6acd,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16d
- 1abc,2,3,4ab,5,6,7d,8,9,10,11,12,13,14ad,15d,16c
- 1c,2,3,4,5b,6,7c,8,9c,10,11ab,12,13c,14,15,16d
- 1b,2b,3,4bd,5,6,7,8,9,10,11a,12,13,14,15d,16
- 1,2,3c,4d,5,6,7,8,9ab,10,11,12d,13cd,14,15,16
I'm glad you know it! As I am quite sure you have figured out, the information provided in the first part (string of numbers/letters) would lead you to pick one of the listed "solutions" to complete the lower-right quadrant of the square. I still haven't been able to work out the solution. Shhhhh, don't tell the liberals the answer!!!
truth be told, I thought it was a crossword puzzle...Skans » 25 Jan 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ I'm glad you know it. I still haven't been able to work out the solution.
It might be? I pilfered this from an extreme IQ test. Truth be told, I have no F-ing idea what the solution is.
But, then again, I'm not a self-proclaimed "numbers-genius" either.