Liberal Forum

Bidencrimefamily » 26 Jan 2024, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 11:01 pm

Huey » 25 Jan 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 8:37 am

Here is the scenario,

A woman is home with her three children.  The husband is at work.  An intruder attempts to kick in the front door and has a knife.  The women and children hide in the closet.  When the intruder fails to kick in the door he drives his car thru the dining room wall and then searches the house. He finds the family in the closet.  The woman shoots the guy in the arm and the family lives. 

The man is a convicted felon who is also out on bond for a gun charge.

In the world of the anti gunnuters left the women and three children are dead because the woman would not have had the firearm.

That's retarded. Double barrel shotty pull both barrels. 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 11:01 am

Huey » 25 Jan 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 10:17 am

As one of the resident gunophobe anti gun nuts I didn’t think you would have anything intelligent to say

The OP is a Monument to *******.

What are the odds that the gun in the home will

A) result in injury or death of occupant

B) spare occupant from your scenario?


 

 

Huey » 25 Jan 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 8:37 am

Here is the scenario,

A woman is home with her three children.  The husband is at work.  An intruder attempts to kick in the front door and has a knife.  The women and children hide in the closet.  When the intruder fails to kick in the door he drives his car thru the dining room wall and then searches the house. He finds the family in the closet.  The woman shoots the guy in the arm and the family lives. 

The man is a convicted felon who is also out on bond for a gun charge.

In the world of the anti gunnuters left the women and three children are dead because the woman would not have had the firearm.  

 

Huey » 27 Jan 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2024, 10:04 am

You should read your own article.  It was only in CA.

We studied 18 million adults living in California.

That is from your article.

R.Suave » 27 Jan 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2024, 10:24 am

In how many states did the incidence to which your citation refers occur?

Huey » 27 Jan 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2024, 10:26 am

500 greenies or make your own point.

Huey » 27 Jan 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2024, 10:06 am

Your reply is a monument to *******.  The OP is a true story.  You ay go in shame now.

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 11:31 am

Huey » 27 Jan 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2024, 10:06 am

Your reply is a monument to *******.  The OP is a true story.  You ay go in shame now.

I'm quite certain that you are the stupidest human being alive.

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 11:31 am

Huey » 27 Jan 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2024, 10:00 am

Someone has been hitting the wine box.

That would have to be you..

I don't drink wine.