Liberal Forum

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 9:48 am

That is an either or question, Lil Feet.  No off topic narrative required.

Are you suggesting that my answer did not meet your expectations?

 
 

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 9:44 am

You are afraid to take a stand.

You are lying...because you're a coward.

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 9:48 am

No..

You have an anecdote.

That is the answer.

The Constitution is not an anecdote.  And your survey only looked at data from CA.  Meaning it only applies to CA.

What is more important?  The lives of the mother and 3 children OR your agenda to disarm Americans?:

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 9:50 am

Are you suggesting that my answer did not meet your expectations?

 
 

 

Lil Feet, what you posted was a diversion and did not address this either or question:

What is more important?  The lives of the mother and 3 children OR your agenda to disarm Americans?:

I guess I will go with your agenda to disarm Americans is more important to you than the lives of the mother and 3 children.

You are a sad lil man.  

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 9:51 am

You are lying...because you're a coward.

 

I have taken a stand.  The lives of the mother and 3 children is more important than your agenda to disarm Americans, gunophobe.  

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:00 am

The Constitution is not an anecdote.  And your survey only looked at data from CA.  Meaning it only applies to CA.

Nor is it data.

And your survey only looked at data from CA.  Meaning it only applies to CA.

Damn, are you a **** idiot.

Your anecdote only applies to the home in which it occurred.

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:04 am

Nor is it data.


Damn, are you a **** idiot.

Your anecdote only applies to the home in which it occurred.

 

That is what I have been trying to tell you, Lil Feet.  But, you attempted to hijack the thread anyway. 

Ii already answered for you.  You actions, words and posts back up that answer.  

Huey » 25 Jan 2024, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 2:27 pm

Concerning the scenario the answers are correct.  I hope you read the entire post.  That "scenario" happened a couple of days ago, *******.  

 

@R. Suave  

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:02 am

Lil Feet, what you posted was a diversion and did not address this either or question:

I guess I will go with your agenda to disarm Americans is more important to you than the lives of the mother and 3 children.

You are a sad lil man.

That doesn't answer the question.

Try again.

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:08 am

That doesn't answer the question.

Try again.

What is more important?  The lives of the mother and 3 children OR your agenda to disarm Americans?:

We will get to your diversion AFTER you chose one or the other in the either or question.

Or, I go with what your posts suggest is your answer and ignore your diversion. 

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:02 am

Lil Feet, what you posted was a diversion and did not address this either or question:


I guess I will go with your agenda to disarm Americans is more important to you than the lives of the mother and 3 children.

You are a sad lil man.  

 

@R. Suave  

You lined out a part.  I want it fresh in your mind. 

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:14 am

We will get to your diversion AFTER you chose one or the other in the either or question.

Or, I go with what your posts suggest is your answer and ignore your diversion.

No...

You have rules about "answers"...


Clarification is in order.

You pay in advance, ZeroIntergrity.
 

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:16 am

@R. Suave  

You lined out a part.  I want it fresh in your mind.

It's irrelevant.

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:14 am

We will get to your diversion AFTER you chose one or the other in the either or question.

Or, I go with what your posts suggest is your answer and ignore your diversion.

Huey-114 minutes ago

Tit firmly in wringer.
Meltdown commencing.

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:17 am

No...

You have rules about "answers"...

Clarification is in order.

You pay in advance, ZeroIntergrity.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here comes the Meltdown!

I answered you yesterday.  Your turn.  Then we move on.  If your next post is not the either or answer I will go with what I posted as your answer and will move on.  If you want to discuss your survey which does not apply to the OP go start a thread.  But don't bother inviting me.  Once I say it was only CA data from CA professors I ignored it. 

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:19 am

Tit firmly in wringer.
Meltdown commencing.

 

You make me laugh.

I answered you yesterday.  Your turn.  Then we move on.  If your next post is not the either or answer I will go with what I posted as your answer and will move on.  If you want to discuss your survey which does not apply to the OP go start a thread.  But don't bother inviting me.  Once I say it was only CA data from CA professors I ignored it. 

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:19 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here comes the Meltdown!

I answered you yesterday.  Your turn.  Then we move on.  If your next post is not the either or answer I will go with what I posted as your answer and will move on.  If you want to discuss your survey which does not apply to the OP go start a thread.  But don't bother inviting me.  Once I say it was only CA data from CA professors I ignored it.

And I have already answered you.

You've already lied in one response.

Huey » 26 Jan 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:20 am

You make me laugh.

I answered you yesterday.  Your turn.  Then we move on.  If your next post is not the either or answer I will go with what I posted as your answer and will move on.  If you want to discuss your survey which does not apply to the OP go start a thread.  But don't bother inviting me.  Once I say it was only CA data from CA professors I ignored it.

You've been answered, Runny.

R.Suave » 26 Jan 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jan 2024, 10:20 am

And I have already answered you.

You've already lied in one response.

IT wa an either or question.  You "answer" was a diversion and contained neither choice.

 

@Huey , you're not going to concede to me that gun control "worked" in Australia and therefore gun confiscation saves lives, are you?  Come on, man, I'm not wearing a cup, kick me in the nut!!!