Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
January Jobs Report......"Oh, wow!"
January Jobs Report......"Oh, wow!"
By R. Suave
2 Feb 2024 7:35 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
2 Feb 2024 11:41 am
THE LINK, TOOL!
2 Feb 2024 11:42 am
the evidence of your innumeracy litters the forum.Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, I didn't think you could understand percentages.
Here watch: What is 100% of 90?
2 Feb 2024 11:44 am
Yeah, I didn't think you could answer. Projecting on me to hide your stupidity, as always.
Watch: What is a proportion?
1. Continue to blame me to hide his embarrassment.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Feb 2024 11:45 am
You don't ask me questions.Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, I didn't think you could answer. Projecting on me to hide your stupidity, as always.
Watch: What is a proportion?
1. Continue to blame me to hide his embarrassment.
You know why.
You are a moron.
We both know why.
2 Feb 2024 11:51 am
R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't ask me questions.
You know why.
You are a moron.
We both know why.
Yes, because you don't answer questions. As demonstrated.
You have the IQ of a frog.
1. "Does the rule apply to you?" My reply: How many times do I have to say "yes." Blah blah blah....predictable POS. 100% accuracy.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Feb 2024 12:02 pm
It doesn't apply to you, evidently.Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, because you don't answer questions. As demonstrated.
You have the IQ of a frog.
1. "Does the rule apply to you?" My reply: How many times do I have to say "yes." Blah blah blah....predictable POS. 100% accuracy.
It evidently applies to me in a different form.
**** idiot.
2 Feb 2024 12:05 pm
R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't apply to you, evidently.
It evidently applies to me in a different form.
**** idiot.
When you answer my questions the first time habitually, I will do the same.
Blame yourself.
Moron.
Die.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Feb 2024 12:07 pm
When I'm satisfied you live by such a rule, I'll reciprocate.Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ When you answer my questions the first time habitually, I will do the same.
Blame yourself.
Moron.
Die.
2 Feb 2024 12:09 pm
R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ When I'm satisfied you live by such a rule, I'll reciprocate.
You started this crap. I am simply treating you how you treat others. I am not the only one that knows about your incessant evasions.
Blame yourself.
Darth Evader.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Feb 2024 12:14 pm
R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ The report also indicated that December's job gains were much better than originally reported. The month posted a gain of 333,000, which was an upwards revision of 117,000 from the initial estimate. November also was revised higher, to 182,000, or 9,000 higher than the last estimate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/02/us-econ ... ected.html
This is terrible......just awful....
Far too many Americans working...
.
Yeah, people take your **** with a grain of salt and a ****. When that $2.29 a dozen eggs 4 years ago now costs you over $5, you could care less about the "unemployment" or "jobs added" lies your boy's labor department puts out.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Feb 2024 12:17 pm
**** your demands. Since when do you submit to anyone else's orders or answer their questions? Yeah, that's what I thought you pos.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Feb 2024 12:33 pm
FIFYR.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ The report also indicated that December's job gains were much better than originally reported. The month posted a gain of 333,000, which was an upwards revision of 117,000 from the initial estimate. November also was revised higher, to 182,000, or 9,000 higher than the last estimate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/02/us-econ ... ected.html
This is terrible......just awful....
Far too many Americans working...two jobs
.
If, according to the BLS, the number of long-term unemployed "was little changed in January"...the labor force participation rate "was unchanged in January"...the employment population ratio "was little changed"...and the number of people not in the labor force who currently want a job "was little changed in January., then most of those "created jobs" must have been filled by people who already had a job. You know, needing to work multiple jobs to survive.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
2 Feb 2024 12:39 pm
ConsRule » 02 Feb 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ FIFY
If, according to the BLS, the number of long-term unemployed "was little changed in January"...the labor force participation rate "was unchanged in January"...the employment population ratio "was little changed"...and the number of people not in the labor force who currently want a job "was little changed in January., then most of those "created jobs" must have been filled by people who already had a job. You know, needing to work multiple jobs to survive.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
why?then most of those "created jobs" must
2 Feb 2024 12:40 pm
Because.
Why did you truncate my comment?
2 Feb 2024 12:46 pm
You don't get out much, do you, Beefondler...Beekeeper » 02 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑
Yeah, people take your **** with a grain of salt and a ****. When that $2.29 a dozen eggs 4 years ago now costs you over $5, you could care less about the "unemployment" or "jobs added" lies your boy's labor department puts out.
2 Feb 2024 12:48 pm
QED.
Do you understand why it doesn't "must"?
2 Feb 2024 12:48 pm
It's the only way he/she can flap her wings and beat her chest and claim "I win"!!!
Age old tactic of the LOSERS who get their ASSES KICKED ON EVERY THREAD!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Feb 2024 12:59 pm
You didn't answer my question. However, to expand on my answer to yours you will need to think logically...which I understand will be a challenge for you.
If there are more jobs filled in the work force and all of the following are true;
The long-term unemployed changed little.
The labor participation rate is unchanged.
The employment-population ratio changed little.
The number of people wanting to work and not in the labor force changed little.
Tell us who is left to fill those new jobs. The population of working age people can only be divided into a few groups...those working, those wanting to work without a job and those not wanting to work. According to the organization cited in the link IN YOUR OP, two of those groups saw little change in their situation...that only leaves one group.
2 Feb 2024 1:14 pm
If you want to understand why, you'll shut the **** up and do as you are told.ConsRule » 02 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ You didn't answer my question. However, to expand on my answer to yours you will need to think logically...which I understand will be a challenge for you.
If there are more jobs filled in the work force and all of the following are true;
The long-term unemployed changed little.
The labor participation rate is unchanged.
The employment-population ratio changed little.
The number of people wanting to work and not in the labor force changed little.
Tell us who is left to fill those new jobs. The population of working age people can only be divided into a few groups...those working, those wanting to work without a job and those not wanting to work. According to the organization cited in the link IN YOUR OP, two of those groups saw little change in their situation...that only leaves one group.
Ya follah?
Nod.
Why do you believe they "must"?
2 Feb 2024 1:17 pm
the dare you be honest first, but in the meantime both stay absolutely corrupted.R. Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ When I'm satisfied you live by such a rule, I'll reciprocate.
Who is online
In total there are 6629 users online :: 14 registered, 14 bots, and 6601 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: LCC, DuckDuckBot, SiteLockSpider, TTD-Content, YandexBot, proximic, ADmantX, curl/7, CriteoBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, bingbot