Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:11 pm

**** your presumption that you do anything of the sort.

You tell me why it "must", and I will tell you why you are wrong.

Until you answer the questions I have posed to you in this thread, the only additional comment you will get from me is:

GO **** YOURSELF!
 

ConsRule » 02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm

Until you answer the questions I have posed to you in this thread, the only additional comment you will get from me is:

GO **** YOURSELF!

@R. Suave  doesn't answer questions. He only demands others to answer his. Almost every member on this board has independently come to the same conclusion about his evasions of questions. It's not just me. 

He is also predictable. Watch this. His response to me will be this same pic he posts. 

Veghead, when you post it, my reply is always the same: You are admitting that the pic is a lie, per the deal. 

Now die. 

ConsRule » 02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm

Until you answer the questions I have posed to you in this thread, the only additional comment you will get from me is:

GO **** YOURSELF!

Until you answer the questions I have posed to you

By your standards, a response is sufficient.

You have it.

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm

@R. Suave  doesn't answer questions. He only demands others to answer his. Almost every member on this board has independently come to the same conclusion about his evasions of questions. It's not just me. 

He is also predictable. Watch this. His response to me will be this same pic he posts. 

Veghead, when you post it, my reply is always the same: You are admitting that the pic is a lie, per the deal. 

Now die.

Then you either:

Explain why it must.


or

Tell him why it doesn't.
 

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm

Then you either:

Explain why it must.

or

Tell him why it doesn't.

Rule, idiot. **** your demands. 

and 

Rule, idiot. **** your demands. 


Coward. 

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm

Rule, idiot. **** your demands. 

and 

Rule, idiot. **** your demands. 

Coward.

**** yours, fraud.

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm

    Now you are admitting that you won't answer questions unless you are paid. 

Then it looks like we get to do the same. Fair is fair. 

Coward.

WTF is this "get to"?

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 12:54 pm

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 2:27 pm

We already know. Here is evidence.

Watch: What was your understand of the deal that you eagerly participated in?

Do you have 50,000 greenies?

 

Oh, look at the not so original basket case stealing material.  What a loser.

Bob @SOCK SAVINGS  is the man and made me rich.  

Huey » 02 Feb 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 4:04 pm

Oh, look at the not so original basket case stealing material.  What a loser.

Bob @SOCK SAVINGS  is the man and made me rich.

Hello friend, 
Good to hear from you. Great news!
Your investments paid dividends.
812 GREENIES for you.
Spend wisely, invest as well.

Here is to Future Prosperity and the Huey Family Prosperity!

Bob
 
@BooRadley    

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:56 pm

WTF is this "get to"?

Rule, idiot. **** your questions.

500 greenies to dumb it down. 

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:49 pm

**** yours, fraud.

Mary ^^^
 
 

ConsRule » 02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm

Until you answer the questions I have posed to you in this thread, the only additional comment you will get from me is:

GO **** YOURSELF!

I usually go with "**** you, stupid."

I think our message is consistent.
Some people are hard to insult...
...either because they're steadfast or because they're stupid.

You'll note that I didn't say, "**** you, steadfast."

I know bidenomics is kicking ***. Trump.never had growth like this.

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm

Throw words at it, Codger....I'm sure it will get off your lawn.

nod...
 

ROG62 » 03 Feb 2024, 1:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 1:20 am

nod...

Show a month Trump had higher jobs numbers?

Bidencrimefamily » 03 Feb 2024, 1:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 1:21 am

Show a month Trump had higher jobs numbers?

Perhaps the most “glaring issue” with Friday’s data comes from the adjusted household survey, rather than the survey of employers used to produce the headline payroll number, according to Jeff Schulze, the head of economic and market strategy at ClearBridge Investments. That data continues to tell a “very different story” than the headline numbers, he wrote in a research note.

“Over the past year, the household survey has averaged less than 150,000 jobs per month than the establishment survey,” he said. “This divergence bears watching as the household survey historically has been more accurate at inflection points indicating job growth may be less impressive than it currently appears.

”Outside of Friday’s data, it is worth nothing that initial and continuing claims for unemployment benefits have ticked up in recent weeks. Citi’s economists suggest this signals that February’s jobs reading will be weaker...

https://www.barrons.com/livecoverage/ja ... port-today

smoke and mirrors...
 

ConsRule » 02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:18 pm

GO **** YOURSELF!

^^^^^^^^^very upset^^^^^^^^^
.   
 

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm

THE LINK, TOOL!

.gov 

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 10:36 am

In this country? If has to do with real news, then sadly the options are scant. I try to find independent journalists.

 

Name 3.


**** fraud.
 

ROG62 » 03 Feb 2024, 1:35 am » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 1:35 am

Perhaps the most “glaring issue” with Friday’s data comes from the adjusted household survey, rather than the survey of employers used to produce the headline payroll number, according to Jeff Schulze, the head of economic and market strategy at ClearBridge Investments. That data continues to tell a “very different story” than the headline numbers, he wrote in a research note.

“Over the past year, the household survey has averaged less than 150,000 jobs per month than the establishment survey,” he said. “This divergence bears watching as the household survey historically has been more accurate at inflection points indicating job growth may be less impressive than it currently appears.

”Outside of Friday’s data, it is worth nothing that initial and continuing claims for unemployment benefits have ticked up in recent weeks. Citi’s economists suggest this signals that February’s jobs reading will be weaker...

https://www.barrons.com/livecoverage/ja ... port-today

smoke and mirrors...

What's the difference between the Household and Establishment surveys, Rog?

 

You'te gonna want to pay attention here,  @ConsRule