Liberal Forum

Protect our borders from invasion.  That's it.  He doesn't have to do anything else, just that one thing.  And, any president who cannot protect his country's borders must be impeached for treason.

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm

Protect our borders from invasion.  That's it.  He doesn't have to do anything else, just that one thing.  And, any president who cannot protect his country's borders must be impeached for treason.

Is there some required minimum size of the invasion force for the impeachable nature of the offense to kick in?

maineman » 05 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm

Is there some required minimum size of the invasion force for the impeachable nature of the offense to kick in?

Try "1"
 

maineman » 05 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm

Is there some required minimum size of the invasion force for the impeachable nature of the offense to kick in?

Incursion of a force of people for the purpose of conquest, plunder or or spread of something harmful to the invaded nation. 

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm

Incursion of a force of people for the purpose of conquest, plunder or or spread of something harmful to the invaded nation.

you dodged the question.

I am not surprised.

maineman » 05 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm

you dodged the question.

I am not surprised.

I suppose I should have said "No", and then stated what I did.  Because an invasion is not determined by the number of the invaders, so long as it meets the definition I provided you.

I didn't say "No" to your question, because I thought you smart enough to presume the answer was no from the rest of what I said. I was wrong about that.
 
 
 

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm

Protect our borders from invasion.  That's it.  He doesn't have to do anything else, just that one thing.  And, any president who cannot protect his country's borders must be impeached for treason.

With a approx. 1.7 million gotaways in 2023, and the dispersing of illegals throughout the country, can’t see how things couldn’t be any clearer……

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm

Protect our borders from invasion.  That's it.  He doesn't have to do anything else, just that one thing.  And, any president who cannot protect his country's borders must be impeached for treason.

Just turn off the FOX, Slack Jaw...

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm

I suppose I should have said "No", and then stated what I did.  Because an invasion is not determined by the number of the invaders, so long as it meets the definition I provided you.

I didn't say "No" to your question, because I thought you smart enough to presume the answer was no from the rest of what I said. I was wrong about that.

Taking another shot at this ****, Skans?

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm

Protect our borders from invasion.  That's it.  He doesn't have to do anything else, just that one thing.  And, any president who cannot protect his country's borders must be impeached for treason.

Sorry you still fail 6th grade civics.  

maineman » 05 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm

Is there some required minimum size of the invasion force for the impeachable nature of the offense to kick in?

One guy skipping rocks on the Rio Grande gives these imbeciles a stroke.  

BooRadley » 05 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm

Try "1"

 

 
 

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm

Incursion of a force of people for the purpose of conquest, plunder or or spread of something harmful to the invaded nation.

Spread of something harmful?  Their meanie words about you?    

R.Suave » 05 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm

Taking another shot at this ****, Skans?
 

Of course.  I plan on being relentless about something as important as the invasion of our country by illegal, criminal aliens.
 

actionjackson » 05 Feb 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 2:40 pm

Sorry you still fail 6th grade civics.

I aced it a long, long time ago.
 

Skans » 05 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm

I suppose I should have said "No", and then stated what I did.  Because an invasion is not determined by the number of the invaders, so long as it meets the definition I provided you.

I didn't say "No" to your question, because I thought you smart enough to presume the answer was no from the rest of what I said. I was wrong about that.

do you think that illegal immigrants crossing our borders to take low-wage jobs in agriculture and food service is "harmful to our nation"?

maineman » 05 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm

do you think that illegal immigrants crossing our borders to take low-wage jobs in agriculture and food service is "harmful to our nation"?

If that's all it is then no, it isn't harmful.  But it is not.  

Huey » 05 Feb 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 3:12 pm

If that's all it is then no, it isn't harmful.  But it is not.

and the activities that these illegal immigrants are conducting that ARE harmful to our nation have NEVER been done by any other group of immigrants before 2021?
 

maineman » 05 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm

do you think that illegal immigrants crossing our borders to take low-wage jobs in agriculture and food service is "harmful to our nation"?

Question..
Do you really think we need another 6 million to pick watermelons?
 

Only BIG TIT wetbacks

between 18-35 should

let into the country