Liberal Forum

Court rules Trump does not have immunity from 2020 election subversion prosecution

3-0.


https://youtu.be/vJ4CTxgvgtE?si=BIW918wVyYO1Jz1E
 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:03 am

Court rules Trump does not have immunity from 2020 election subversion prosecution

3-0.

https://youtu.be/vJ4CTxgvgtE?si=BIW918wVyYO1Jz1E

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste. 

Level 0. 

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:04 am

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste. 

Level 0.

Another subject about which you know nothing.

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:05 am

Another subject about which you know nothing.

Prove you do. Your thoughts. 

Yeah, I didn't think so. 


1. The whole "Post yours" conversation. 

Redundant mother ****. 

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:08 am

Prove you do. Your thoughts. 

Yeah, I didn't think so. 

1. The whole "Post yours" conversation. 

Redundant mother ****.

I have posted yours...

You cried like a sissy.

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:04 am

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste. 

Level 0.

Let me ask you:  Trump's lawyers, when asked if he could be criminally charged with sending Seal Team SIx to assassinate his political rivals, responded that he would be liable for prosecution only if the House impeached, and the Senate convicted him of the articles of impeachment first.  There position is that a sitting president can do ANYTHING he wants to do, that he is literally above all criminal laws until the political impeachment process takes him off that high perch.  Does that make ANY sense to you?

And, noooooo Grifty.....you will not be playing games with the courts...


The appeals court has set up a very fast schedule for Donald Trump to appeal their ruling rejecting his claims of immunity from criminal prosecution.

 The court is giving Trump until February 12 to file an emergency stay request with the Supreme Court, which would stop the clock while his attorneys craft a more substantive appeal on the merits. If he is successful with that, the criminal trial will not resume until after the high court decides what to do with his request for a pause.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ ... index.html
 

maineman » 06 Feb 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:10 am

Let me ask you:  Trump's lawyers, when asked if he could be criminally charged with sending Seal Team SIx to assassinate his political rivals, responded that he would be liable for prosecution only if the House impeached, and the Senate convicted him of the articles of impeachment first.  There position is that a sitting president can do ANYTHING he wants to do, that he is literally above all criminal laws until the political impeachment process takes him off that high perch.  Does that make ANY sense to you?

Nope. it doesn't. I have always maintained that Trump believes to be above the law. That's why I never voted for him. I won't vote for him in 2024. I refuse to vote for any candidate who believes they are above the law. That includes Biden. Clearly, according to history, most presidents (if not all) have always been treated as they are above the law. 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:10 am

I have posted yours...

You cried like a sissy.

Another lie from Mary. 

Day 3 of Mary. Will you be creeping around in my profile again or just go through your file of me on your computer? 

Stalkers will stalk. 

1. "Are these your words" crap. 

100% accuracy. Pathetic. 

maineman » 06 Feb 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:10 am

Let me ask you:  Trump's lawyers, when asked if he could be criminally charged with sending Seal Team SIx to assassinate his political rivals, responded that he would be liable for prosecution only if the House impeached, and the Senate convicted him of the articles of impeachment first.  There position is that a sitting president can do ANYTHING he wants to do, that he is literally above all criminal laws until the political impeachment process takes him off that high perch.  Does that make ANY sense to you?

You assume @Vegas  has any awareness of this.


You can't begin to imagine how uninformed he is.
 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:15 am

You assume @Vegas  has any awareness of this.

You can't begin to imagine how uninformed he is.

Projecting. You are only as informed to the degree of what you media tells you to believe. 

Uh oh....I just trashed Mary's media. We all know what that means. Here comes the rage.   

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:15 am

Another lie from Mary. 

Day 3 of Mary. Will you be creeping around in my profile again or just go through your file of me on your computer? 

Stalkers will stalk. 

1. "Are these your words" crap. 

100% accuracy. Pathetic.

Another lie from Mary. 

Followed by a confirmation of my statement...

Day 3 of Mary. Will you be creeping around in my profile again or just go through your file of me on your computer? 

must be the dumbest mofo alive..

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:16 am

Followed by a confirmation of my statement...

must be the dumbest mofo alive..

You literally just copy/pasted my words. No thoughts of your own again. 

Just as predicted. 100% accuracy. 

Embarrassing. 

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:04 am

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste. 

Level 0.

Not even a link either...

Lol
 

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:16 am

Projecting. You are only as informed to the degree of what you media tells you to believe. 

Uh oh....I just trashed Mary's media. We all know what that means. Here comes the rage. 

Post your sources.



You can't trash media you refuse to read.

Logic.

 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:13 am

And, noooooo Grifty.....you will not be playing games with the courts...

The appeals court has set up a very fast schedule for Donald Trump to appeal their ruling rejecting his claims of immunity from criminal prosecution.

 The court is giving Trump until February 12 to file an emergency stay request with the Supreme Court, which would stop the clock while his attorneys craft a more substantive appeal on the merits. If he is successful with that, the criminal trial will not resume until after the high court decides what to do with his request for a pause.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ ... index.html

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste.  And no, *******, this is not even level .5 

And, noooooo Grifty.....you will not be playing games with the courts...

 

RedheadedStranger » 06 Feb 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:17 am

Not even a link either...

Lol

Why do you need a link?
 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:18 am

Post your sources.


 

1k greenies or rule, idiot. **** your demands. 
 

RedheadedStranger » 06 Feb 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:17 am

Not even a link either...

Lol

I got him raging again.   
 
 

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:18 am

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste.  And no, *******, this is not even level .5

You don't know anything about it.

Your "media" is such **** you don't dare to name it.