another stupid **** post, RN...NEXT!R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you made your vision thing the issue....
Describe what you see
Then why stray from the @Vegas feed, Rog?
swave....RedheadedStranger » 06 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Vanity Fair wont do **** without the threat of legal action, which I wouldn't pursue in the first place... so what's the point. They hate Trump.
I would be willing to bet that any inquiries would simply be ignored.
I've made my case here with photographic evidence and rational arguments... and you have only offered "blue eyes" and a caption from the Vanity Fair Society page.
If that were Trump in that picture, it would certainly be more prominently displayed across the Internet than just on the Vanity Fair Society page. Hell, other Vanity Fair stories about Cohn and Trump aren't even using the same picture.
The Vanity Fair Society page is literally the ONLY source on the entirety of the internet claiming that's Trump in that picture. That's it. NOBODY else is making the claim... except your dumb *** of course.
Not only is the guy your claiming to be Trump too short, his head is too small, and he looks nothing like Trump in the first place.
Just the facts ma'am.

You know damn well that would have been all over the news when he was running for president...RedheadedStranger » 06 Feb 2024, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you explain why literally no other source on the entirety of the Internet is saying that's Trump in that picture?
Not a SINGLE one exists.
With all of the ire and hatred aimed at Donald Trump by the media, don't you think that this damning picture of Trump dressed as a Studio 54 party boy wouldn't be plastered all over the internet instead of ONLY being featured once on the Vanity Fair Society page?
If you can find another source making the same claim, I'll shut up... just one. Just one other source.
Until then I'm calling **** and you an idiot for falling for it.
![]()
nod...R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Why are you still going on?
I don't believe your eyes, but VF might..
Would you like me to proofread your submission?
has anyone who has assumed power the first day been called a dictator?maineman » 06 Feb 2024, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ and I will ask you to quit **** dodging two simple yes or no questions:
1. Have you ever heard of a dictator who, having taken power, voluntarily relinquished it after 24 hours?
2. Have you ever heard of a dictator who, having taken power, voluntarily limited his dictatorial powers to only two issues?
You gotta quit being a ****** and just answer the **** questions. I am about done asking.
R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't need one.
My source is identified
A second source is only required to corrobirate an anonymous one.
You'd have to impeach my source.
Good luck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOYNe1Vc3gUR.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Not that I have to, but there's the illegal withholding of aid to Ukraine, and the extraconstitutional effort to effect a change of results in Georgia.
The impeachment verdict is meaningless....even Moscow Mitch admitted it.
tool....R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I understand....you've convinced yourself you're seeing something.....but you're a susceptible rube.
It doesn't convince me, because I am not.....you can stop your desperate campaign...
You need to challenge your faith by addressing your doubts to VF.
Be sure to update us all.

nod...
Yep. We all know.R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑I am a coward. My advanced dementia leaves me dumber than I already am.
Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia.
- Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples).
- "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful.
- Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam.
- "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
- Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies.
- Projection
Maybe it has been asked already, I didn't bother to read 11 pages in order to find out, but does this mean they got him now?R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Court rules Trump does not have immunity from 2020 election subversion prosecution
3-0.
https://youtu.be/vJ4CTxgvgtE?si=BIW918wVyYO1Jz1E

Do you think we don't, Brinker?Jantje_Smit » 07 Feb 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe it has been asked already, I didn't bother to read 11 pages in order to find out, but does this mean they got him now?
![]()
Not very good news for Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden. Let the trials begin.R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Court rules Trump does not have immunity from 2020 election subversion prosecution
3-0.
https://youtu.be/vJ4CTxgvgtE?si=BIW918wVyYO1Jz1E
Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Not very good news for Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden. Let the trials begin.
Finally. You agree that you stop listening to CNN/Bloomberg.
when you reply to his next post, use his mentality and say "I believe, you believe, your we got him now.".Jantje_Smit » 07 Feb 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe it has been asked already, I didn't bother to read 11 pages in order to find out, but does this mean they got him now?
:rofl:
That's my opinion, each of them have committed crimes performing their duties as President, Precedent is set.