Too much pipe dope, Cheddy..Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ That's my opinion, each of them have committed crimes performing their duties as President, Precedent is set.
Pipe dope is a lubricant and sealant, not a hallucinogenic, retard.
And a CNS depressant, tool.Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Pipe dope is a lubricant and sealant, not a hallucinogenic, retard.
It clearly states on the can, "Not for human consumption." I've always wondered what kind of retard would need that warning, I guess I finally know after 40 years. Don't eat or smoke pipe dope you **** retard.
And Reality TV isn't real...Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ It clearly states on the can, "Not for human consumption." I've always wondered what kind of retard would need that warning, I guess I finally know after 40 years. Don't eat or smoke pipe dope you **** retard.
I wouldn't know, I don't waste my time on such frivolous endeavors.
it is really staged performances, just like every reality on the world stage people pretending be exceptions to the natural process of adapting ancestrally here as specifically displaced now.
To arrive at your judgement about Grifty did you examine his financial statements, or did you read his manifesto?Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't know, I don't waste my time on such frivolous endeavors.
R.Suave » 07 Feb 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑ To arrive at your judgement about Grifty did you examine his financial statements, or did you read his manifesto?
why the **** can't you answer simple questions?
Why can't you... bitchR.Suave » 07 Feb 2024, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ why the **** can't you answer simple questions?
Stupidest **** alive...
I watch people take sides rationalizing away their natural time adapting as displaced pretending to be exempt from evolving in plain sight. Can't have an honest discussion about it when everyone debates which reality is more popular today.R. Suave » 07 Feb 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑ To arrive at your judgement about Grifty did you examine his financial statements, or did you read his manifesto?
“Former U.S. Representative Doug Collins says an appeals court decision Tuesday that ruled former President Donald Trump isn’t protected by presidential immunity could lead to consequences for former Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama. "BY this ruling, they're basically opening the door up for the Obama drone strikes which killed Americans and the George Bush policy of detainees and the torture memos that all came up. We may agree that those were fine, but somebody in the Department of Justice could say 'you violated the color of the law here, and we're going to prosecute you now that you're out of the office,'" says Collins.”R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Court rules Trump does not have immunity from 2020 election subversion prosecution
3-0.
https://youtu.be/vJ4CTxgvgtE?si=BIW918wVyYO1Jz1E
Go for it...Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑ “Former U.S. Representative Doug Collins says an appeals court decision Tuesday that ruled former President Donald Trump isn’t protected by presidential immunity could lead to consequences for former Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama. "BY this ruling, they're basically opening the door up for the Obama drone strikes which killed Americans and the George Bush policy of detainees and the torture memos that all came up. We may agree that those were fine, but somebody in the Department of Justice could say 'you violated the color of the law here, and we're going to prosecute you now that you're out of the office,'" says Collins.”
I guess I’m not the only seeing the precedent being set.
**chuckle**
Beekeeper » 07 Feb 2024, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ 3 judge panel. He STILL can appeal to the FULL COURT EN BANC you STUPID **** ASSWIPING PIECE OF ****!!!!
And even after that to the SCOTUS!!!
Sucks for you that I JUST KNEECAPPED YOUR MORONIC POS *** INTO A TINY LITTLE PULP, HUH??
Cedar » 07 Feb 2024, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑ “Former U.S. Representative Doug Collins says an appeals court decision Tuesday that ruled former President Donald Trump isn’t protected by presidential immunity could lead to consequences for former Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama. "BY this ruling, they're basically opening the door up for the Obama drone strikes which killed Americans and the George Bush policy of detainees and the torture memos that all came up. We may agree that those were fine, but somebody in the Department of Justice could say 'you violated the color of the law here, and we're going to prosecute you now that you're out of the office,'" says Collins.”
I guess I’m not the only seeing the precedent being set.
**chuckle**
R.Suave » 19 Feb 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... rcna138869
Trump opts against Supreme Court appeal on civil immunity claim over Jan. 6 lawsuits
Immunity has been rejected, twice...Beekeeper » 19 Feb 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Different case, EPSTEIN!!
This is NOT anything but a CIVIL lawsuit, not a criminal case we are talking about on this thread!! Besides, if his IMMUNITY holds up on the Smith INVENTED CHARGES, then these cases AUTOMATICALLY get tossed. THAT'S how **** STUPID your post is.