Liberal Forum

maineman » 06 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm

he was joking.  he really wasn't serious.  he didn't mean it.  HOW THE **** DO YOU KNOW THAT??????


 

How the **** do you know he wasn't?  Liberals have been saying for years he constantly lies but they pick and choose what they call a lie and what they choose to treat as the gospel truth coming out of his mouth.
 

RedheadedStranger » 06 Feb 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:18 pm

RIOTING ******.....NOOOOOOES!

ConsRule » 06 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm

How the **** do you know he wasn't?  Liberals have been saying for years he constantly lies but they pick and choose what they call a lie and what they choose to treat as the gospel truth coming out of his mouth.

A real challenging task...

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:02 pm

by simply asserting that the **** you've been told to believe is correct.

Junior, I am not like you.  I wasn't told anything.  I actually watched the video.  YOU are being told what he said and you are believing all of it.  

Huey » 06 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm

Junior, I am not like you.  I wasn't told anything.  I actually watched the video.  YOU are being told what he said and you are believing all of it.

The **** you weren't.

He made several such comments.

And he's got a record.
 

maineman » 06 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm

I watched the video and [s[I read the transcripts of the immunity hearing where he lawyers claimed that, he would need to be impeached and convicted of the articles of impeachment before he could be held criminally liable for assassinating his rivals.[/s]

He claims he was kidding and he claims he would only limit his dictatorial powers to two issues and 24 hours.  

How many dictators do YOU know of who voluntarily relinquished power after holding it for 24 hours?

Any??  Yes or No would suffice

 

Not here to discuss his hearings. 

Signing an EO is not being a dictator.  

 

Vegas » 06 Feb 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 11:19 am

I got him raging again. 

Can anyone remember what Trump was impeached for...?

Was it for that time he called Greta a total **** retard...?    

Getting peed on by Russian Hookers...?     

For ordering MAGA to murder 5 Capitol Cops with fire extinguishers and to go hang Pence in the back of a pick up truck  if he doesn't flip the election...?   

Or was it for having extra-marital sex back when dinosaurs were patrolling the USA with that wrinkled old prostitute...?    

NOPE..the real reason was to keep TRUMP from making good on his promise to shut down the Jew World Order's  Illegal Alien Agenda.
THAT is why they had to throw everything they had at him,  to get him out of office....  
 
 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm

The **** you weren't.

He made several such comments.

And he's got a record.

He has no record of being a dictator.  When you moron's are asked you stutter like biden about posting a thread title. 

ConsRule » 06 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm

Never said he was.  I was just pointing out the court and/or the person making the post I quoted don't fully understand his legal options.  The next step may or may not be an appeal to the Supreme Court.

How do you figure other people "don't understand"?


 

GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm

Can anyone remember what Trump was impeached for...?

Was it for that time he called Greta a total **** retard...?    

Getting peed on by Russian Hookers...?     

For ordering MAGA to murder 5 Capitol Cops with fire extinguishers and to go hang Pence in the back of a pick up truck  if he doesn't flip the election...?   

Or was it for having extra-marital sex back when dinosaurs were patrolling the USA with that wrinkled old prostitute...?    

NOPE..the real reason was to keep TRUMP from making good on his promise to shut down the Jew World Order's  Illegal Alien Agenda.
THAT is why they had to throw everything they had at him,  to get him out of office....

Who knows? I am sure the TDS crowd will tell us.   

Huey » 06 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm

He has no record of being a dictator.  When you moron's are asked you stutter like biden about posting a thread title.

You're a **** idiot.

He doesn't recognize election results.

His attorneys argue, on his behalf, that he can assassinate political opponents.

He insists on an immunity so absurdly expansive that it is laughed out of court 3-0.




 

GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm

Can anyone remember what Trump was impeached for...?

Was it for that time he called Greta a total **** retard...?    

Getting peed on by Russian Hookers...?     

For ordering MAGA to murder 5 Capitol Cops with fire extinguishers and to go hang Pence in the back of a pick up truck  if he doesn't flip the election...?   

Or was it for having extra-marital sex back when dinosaurs were patrolling the USA with that wrinkled old prostitute...?    

NOPE..the real reason was to keep TRUMP from making good on his promise to shut down the Jew World Order's  Illegal Alien Agenda.
THAT is why they had to throw everything they had at him,  to get him out of office....

The first time it was when he threatened to withhold a billion dollar loan to Ukraine unless they fired a prosecutor investigating a company that his son was working for at the time...

Oh wait...
 

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm

How do you figure other people "don't understand"?

It's an assumption on my part since they gave him a deadline to appeal to the Supreme Court (according to your post) and not to appeal or request an en banc hearing.

Acknowledge you question was answered.
 

RedheadedStranger » 06 Feb 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:32 pm

The first time it was when he threatened to withhold a billion dollar loan to Ukraine unless they fired a prosecutor investigating a company that his son was working for at the time...

Oh wait...

GEE WHIZ...!!!
I guess only Democrats JEW WORLD ORDER PUPPETS  get to do really cool stuff like that...?
 
 
 

ConsRule » 06 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm

It's an assumption on my part since they gave him a deadline to appeal to the Supreme Court (according to your post) and not to appeal or request an en banc hearing.

Acknowledge you question was answered.

Not exactly...
And in another significant part of their decision, the three appellate judges also circumscribed Mr. Trump’s ability to use further appeals to waste more time and delay the election case from going to trial — a strategy the former president has pursued since the indictment against him was filed in August in Federal District Court in Washington.

 The panel said that if Mr. Trump appeals its decision to the Supreme Court, the underlying case, which was put on hold by the trial judge in December, would remain suspended until the justices decided whether to hear the matter.

 But the panel imposed a rule designed to discourage Mr. Trump from making an intermediate challenge to the full court of appeals. It said that if Mr. Trump instead took that route, trial preparations could begin again after Feb. 12.

[url]http://Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/p ... roid-share[/url]

They're cutting off his escape routes...

If he asks for En Banc, he faces the same judges who broke Michael Flynn off in his ***....if he loses, his trial proceeds again next week.

Overturned

YOU GOT HIM NOW!!!

R.Suave » 06 Feb 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:49 pm

Not exactly...
And in another significant part of their decision, the three appellate judges also circumscribed Mr. Trump’s ability to use further appeals to waste more time and delay the election case from going to trial — a strategy the former president has pursued since the indictment against him was filed in August in Federal District Court in Washington.

 The panel said that if Mr. Trump appeals its decision to the Supreme Court, the underlying case, which was put on hold by the trial judge in December, would remain suspended until the justices decided whether to hear the matter.

 But the panel imposed a rule designed to discourage Mr. Trump from making an intermediate challenge to the full court of appeals. It said that if Mr. Trump instead took that route, trial preparations could begin again after Feb. 12.

[url]http://Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/p ... roid-share[/url]

They're cutting off his escape routes...

If he asks for En Banc, he faces the same judges who broke Michael Flynn off in his ***....if he loses, his trial proceeds again next week.

And the appeals court cannot stop the trial judge from postponing the trail until after the en banc decision.  Maybe he should appeal the part that says he cannot fully exercise his legal options part of the ruling, saving the appeal of the ruling on the fact until later.  Seems these three judges have a problem with some parts of due process.  I wonder where they feel the get the authority to suspend due process.

 

ConsRule » 06 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm

And the appeals court cannot stop the trial judge from postponing the trail until after the en banc decision.  Maybe he should appeal the part that says he cannot fully exercise his legal options part of the ruling, saving the appeal of the ruling on the fact until later.  Seems these three judges have a problem with some parts of due process.  I wonder where they feel the get the authority to suspend due process.

Just as there is Due Process, as you should have learned from Flynn, there are checks on the abuse of Due Process.

Huey » 06 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm

Not here to discuss his hearings. 

Signing an EO is not being a dictator.

Not here to consider the evidence.

Natch....too weedy...