
Speaking of landlords here is a clip about landlords from 1970. What is that debate between art and reality?Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2024, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ Several landlords?? In your little one horse town?? Really now??
So, you are saying, WITH ZERO EVIDENCE of your claim, that this is a NATIONWIDE thing??
And you expect us to accept this as FACTUAL PROOF of rent prices??
Not "landlords", yutz.Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2024, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ Several landlords?? In your little one horse town?? Really now??
So, you are saying, WITH ZERO EVIDENCE of your claim, that this is a NATIONWIDE thing??
And you expect us to accept this as FACTUAL PROOF of rent prices??
R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Not "landlords", yutz.
Institutional Multifamily managers.
It's my business, Fondler.Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ AKA- LANDLORDS!!
And once AGAIN, you provide ZERO EVIDENCE to support your claim!!
https://skepticink.com/backgroundprobab ... -razor.png
https://i0.wp.com/moonpointer.com/new/w ... assert.jpgIt implies that the burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim; if this burden is not met, then the claim is unfounded, and its opponents need not argue further in order to dismiss it.
cannot dismiss anything else is possible ideologies never discussing what will never exists in time separating actual evolving results adapting as displaced.

Focus on fixing the corrupted, instead of preserving corruption.Skans » 14 Feb 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ I was reading the news today. There is a lot in it about Joe Biden. And, I thought to myself "JOE BIDEN STILL SUCKS!"
PEOPLE SAY I SUCK,
DO I?