Exactly. God bless the 2nd amendment. No quarter.DeezerShoove » 07 Feb 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Can I kill the **** without too much paperwork after they are unleashed on me and my family?
That keeps the prisons less cluttered too.
The dead heads you are "defending" get to stay in mom's basement (dodging her tears).
We get to kill the needy ones who go out **** with society.
Moderation preserved. Street cleaning enhanced. Saving tax dollars.
Everyone happy.
Not even close to being the same. Murder violates the rights of others. People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves.ConsRule » 07 Feb 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ If you follow that logic, if we eliminate laws against murder we should see a noticeable drop in the number of people who die violently at the hands of others.
Except when they decide to do other things while high.Vegas » 07 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Not even close to being the same. Murder violates the rights of others. People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves.
what? Collateral damages and the intoxicated idiot destroys themself they usually take others down in the event of self destruction.Vegas » 07 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Not even close to being the same. Murder violates the rights of others. People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves.
ConsRule » 07 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Except when they decide to do other things while high.
I seem to remember reading articles about how there is still a significant criminal market for weed in states that have "legalized" it.
Did I say that? I was pointing out that people who get high (and drunk) often do infringe on the rights of others. That is why my murder analogy was relevant. Take your approach to the extreme...do away with all laws because free people behave better.Vegas » 07 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ People get killed by drunk drivers. Do you want prohibition back?
ConsRule » 07 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I say that? I was pointing out that people who get high (and drunk) often do infringe on the rights of others. That is why my murder analogy was relevant. Take your approach to the extreme...do away with all laws because free people behave better.
Nostradamus'omh » 07 Feb 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ You are making a joke, correct? Don't think they made drugs more than ate the correct or wrong plants, insects, or animals.
"People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves."Vegas » 07 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Not even close to being the same. Murder violates the rights of others. People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves.
DeezerShoove » 07 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ "People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves."
Extremely naive statement.
(btw, you mean affect.
memory trick: Action-Affect and rEsult-Effect.
I need a lot of those.![]()
Vegas » 07 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It happens. People can say racist things that affect others. Should we prohibit free speech?
People kill others with guns. Should we ban guns?
back then, adapt or become extinct each ancestor couldn't allow themselves to pretend life is but a dream state of mind. every ancestor wasn't organized to defeat any other ideology invented to persuade ancestors to give up being ancestry to serve ideas that can last for generations, not just individual lifetimes adapting as displaced.Kobia2 » 07 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm guessing Neanderthals and Magic Mushrooms didn't remain strangers to one another.....
Any Drug addict with a bad enough habit, will and often does violate the rights of others to feed their habit...Vegas » 07 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Not even close to being the same. Murder violates the rights of others. People who do drugs/alcohol effect themselves.
Kobia2 » 07 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Any Drug addict with a bad enough habit, will and often does violate the rights of others to feed their habit...