Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Biden classified document case ends without charges
Biden classified document case ends without charges
By Punch
7 Feb 2024 7:11 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 Feb 2024 9:37 am
Maybe he has notifications turned off. so that would be zero by choice to ignore you without putting you on ignore.
9 Feb 2024 9:38 am
I didn't demand a retraction you idiot.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ How many have you sent to major media companies demanding the retraction of a caption under a photo?
In the last 6 months...
Probably for the same reason your proctologist is skeptical of your claims of alien anal probes...
But that's just a guess.
I asked for confirmation that the photo and caption were accurate.
There is a difference ya know.
Maybe you don't
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Feb 2024 9:40 am
Ok, so call it "miffed"...RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't demand a retraction you idiot.
I asked for confirmation that the photo and caption were accurate.
There is a difference ya know.
Maybe you don't
9 Feb 2024 9:46 am
Why would Condé Nast pass on confirming something that they published?
(Hint: Because they know it's ****)
Sorry Rico... you were duped.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Feb 2024 9:48 am
Cause they suspect that you're a **** loon.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Why would Condé Nast pass on confirming something that they published?
(Hint: Because they know it's ****)
Sorry Rico... you were duped.
9 Feb 2024 9:58 am
9 Feb 2024 10:00 am
Why would making a simple and polite request to confirm something they published make me a loon?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Feb 2024 10:05 am
RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ Why would making a simple and polite request to confirm something they published make me a loon?
they're probably looking for the VP in charge of explaing "attribution" to angry MAGAts...
Shouldn't be long...
9 Feb 2024 10:08 am
Tomorrow, correct?R. Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ they're probably looking for the VP in charge of explaing "attribution" to angry MAGAts...
Shouldn't be long...
9 Feb 2024 10:11 am
They published it on their site, so surely they screened it for accuracy from the original source.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ they're probably looking for the VP in charge of explaing "attribution" to angry MAGAts...
Shouldn't be long...
Or maybe they didn't... which is why they are pleading the 5th.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Feb 2024 10:23 am
Yes, they did....and attributed it accordingly.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ They published it on their site, so surely they screened it for accuracy from the original source.
Or maybe they didn't... which is why they are pleading the 5th.
9 Feb 2024 10:26 am
Then they should have a problem relaying that info to me in an email... per my request.
Can you think of any reason why they wouldn't?
I can... because it's ****.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Feb 2024 10:27 am
I suspect they may believe their obligations have been satisfied...RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Then they should have a problem relaying that info to me in an email... per my request.
Can you think of any reason why they wouldn't?
I can... because it's ****.
9 Feb 2024 10:33 am
Factual accuracy isn't actual accuracy when evolving here now.Redheaded Stranger » 09 Feb 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ They published it on their site, so surely they screened it for accuracy from the original source.
Or maybe they didn't... which is why they are pleading the 5th.
:clap:
9 Feb 2024 10:35 am
Nostradamus'omh » 09 Feb 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Factual accuracy isn't actual accuracy when evolving here now.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Feb 2024 10:37 am
Dum Dum, your memory is as bad as Biden's. The forum posts the top posters. I don't have to count anything, Check out this great technology:
prolific
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Feb 2024 10:40 am
RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ They published it on their site, so surely they screened it for accuracy from the original source.
Or maybe they didn't... which is why they are pleading the 5th.
A left wing rag checking for accuracy? LMAO! That's a good one.
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Feb 2024 10:47 am
Is this a name that tune post?Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ A left wing rag checking for accuracy? LMAO! That's a good one.
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another
9 Feb 2024 10:47 am
Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Dum Dum, your memory is as bad as Biden's. The forum posts the top posters. I don't have to count anything, Check out this great technology:
prolific
I don't require a lot of prompts to remember my own words.Dum Dum, your memory is as bad as Biden's.
PTL! Pass the snake...I don't have to count anything,
9 Feb 2024 10:52 am
"but... but... the caption... and the blue eyes!"Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ A left wing rag checking for accuracy? LMAO! That's a good one.
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Who is online
In total there are 3934 users online :: 7 registered, 14 bots, and 3913 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove
Bots: CensysInspect, proximic, Mojeek, MicroMessenger, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit