Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Supreme Court hearing arguments about Jan. 6 is interesting.
Supreme Court hearing arguments about Jan. 6 is interesting.
By PhiloBeddo
8 Feb 2024 10:48 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Feb 2024 1:08 pm
Neither am I .....
I listened live to the SCOTUS hearing today ....
Flipping back and forth from Fox to CNN .....
Where the same audio was being broadcasted ....
you stupid schmuck!
8 Feb 2024 1:13 pm
No, you have a solid record of failing to do so.Majik » 08 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither am I .....
I listened live to the SCOTUS hearing today ....
Flipping back and forth from Fox to CNN .....
Where the same audio was being broadcasted ....
you stupid schmuck!
8 Feb 2024 1:13 pm
For now...subject to changes by the legislatures of the various states individually.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ It is an election for Federal uhhhhhhhhh....office....
It is determined by a count of duly assigned state electors. Said electors are guided by the voters of their respective states.
8 Feb 2024 1:16 pm
Precisely.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ It is an election for Federal uhhhhhhhhh....office....
It is determined by a count of duly assigned state electors. Said electors are guided by the voters of their respective states.
nod
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 1:18 pm
I heard a little of it. Yes, the Colorado attorney is a *******. But, watch, there will still be 2 or 3 stupid **** on the SCOTUS who vote to keep Trump off of ballots. Just won't be able to see through their own political bias.PhiloBeddo » 08 Feb 2024, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Colorado is looking like dumb asses. They won't answer questions directly. The guy arguing for Colorado is a moron. Did you indict, have a trial and convict Trump? Ahhhhhhhh, np answer.
8 Feb 2024 1:19 pm
6-3 or at best 7-2.ConsRule » 08 Feb 2024, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ If the line of questioning (per the report I read) is an indication, it looks like 8-1 in favor of keeping Trump on the ballot.
8 Feb 2024 1:21 pm
When Democrats are no longer for Democracy, well that's what we have the SCOTUS for. Because, you **** are for some kind of bueaurocratic dictatorship as opposed to democracy.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ So now SCOTUS will micro manage state election processes...
8 Feb 2024 1:23 pm
No, I don't....
I just gave you two sources ....
both with the exact same broadcast ....
minus the differing useless opinions of both ....
because all opinions are mine .....unlike you ....
8 Feb 2024 1:25 pm
Don't be an idiot.Majik » 08 Feb 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I don't....
I just gave you two sources ....
both with the exact same broadcast ....
minus the differing useless opinions of both ....
because all opinions are mine .....unlike you ....
There's only one version.
8 Feb 2024 1:25 pm
**** - it sure as **** is skin off your ***. You've been screaming "insurrection" on this forum for a long time now. It looks like your *** has been skinned, and the shavings are hanging up to smoke and cure in the SCOTUS fat-*** pig Smokery.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ No skin off my teeth...
I think your complete indifference to matters of character is a defining quality of MAGA.
8 Feb 2024 1:25 pm
ConsRule » 08 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ My unsolicited advice to you, maineman and other liberals is to purchase crayons and coloring books. It appears you will need them for your emotional well-being and recovery when the decision is handed down.
8 Feb 2024 1:27 pm
There sure are more Red states than Blue states!PhiloBeddo » 08 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What would happen if a Red state took the Dem candidate off the ballot?
8 Feb 2024 1:28 pm
Cascading legal effect regarding Insurrection ....if SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump.....
Prove me wrong....
8 Feb 2024 1:28 pm
That is what courts have established. My feelings wouldn't make any difference to the state of Colorado.Skans » 08 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ **** - it sure as **** is skin off your ***. You've been screaming "insurrection" on this forum for a long time now. It looks like your *** has been skinned, and the shavings are hanging up to smoke and cure in the SCOTUS fat-*** pig Smokery.
We have no idea what SCOTUS will determine, but I seriously doubt they will directly challenge the Colorado courts' factual findings.
8 Feb 2024 1:29 pm
Majik » 08 Feb 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Cascading legal effect regarding Insurrection ....if SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump.....
Prove me wrong....
I think you people are tripping...
8 Feb 2024 1:30 pm
They have no factual finding's .....just partisan opinions .R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ That is what courts have established. My feelings wouldn't make any difference to the state of Colorado.
We have no idea what SCOTUS will determine, but I seriously doubt they will directly challenge the Colorado courts' factual findings.
8 Feb 2024 1:31 pm
Take that sad **** elsewhere, Jonestown.Skans » 08 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ When Democrats are no longer for Democracy, well that's what we have the SCOTUS for. Because, you **** are for some kind of bueaurocratic dictatorship as opposed to democracy.
8 Feb 2024 1:31 pm
I say they will. They will challenge it on the fact that there was no due process for a judicial determination of "insurrection" by Trump.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ That is what courts have established. My feelings wouldn't make any difference to the state of Colorado.
We have no idea what SCOTUS will determine, but I seriously doubt they will directly challenge the Colorado courts' factual findings.
8 Feb 2024 1:32 pm
Nope.
Just putting you and your opinion in your rightful place.....
8 Feb 2024 1:33 pm
Technically, *** are not a name, it's a group....groper.
Who is online
In total there are 3109 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 3084 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Fuelman
Bots: MQQBrowser, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, proximic, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot