Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Supreme Court hearing arguments about Jan. 6 is interesting.
Supreme Court hearing arguments about Jan. 6 is interesting.
By PhiloBeddo
8 Feb 2024 10:48 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Feb 2024 4:20 pm
Grimsley noted that despite the repeated efforts by Trump’s attorneys to characterize the committee as politically motivated, few of its factual findings were disputed.
“They haven’t come in here and really challenged the veracity of many of those findings. They just complain about the process,” Grimsley said. “President Trump could have come in here and testified. There are other people who could have come in here and testified. But they don’t really question any of the findings that we’re relying on.”
which you would know had you actually watched the hearings
.
8 Feb 2024 4:21 pm
Majik » 08 Feb 2024, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Also...
The Jan.6th commitee is now under investigation by a Congressional commitee.....
8 Feb 2024 4:30 pm
8 Feb 2024 4:39 pm
An insurrection is a criminal matter because Congress codified it into the US Code. Congress does not have the authority to conduct criminal investigations and the only criminal referral they have the authority to make is contempt of Congress. And even that one rarely result in actual charges. Thus, the findings of the Piglosi Political Circus has no bearing on anything. The can declare what happened on J6 is a banana...that doesn't mean it can be pealed and eaten.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Grimsley noted that despite the repeated efforts by Trump’s attorneys to characterize the committee as politically motivated, few of its factual findings were disputed.
“They haven’t come in here and really challenged the veracity of many of those findings. They just complain about the process,” Grimsley said. “President Trump could have come in here and testified. There are other people who could have come in here and testified. But they don’t really question any of the findings that we’re relying on.”
which you would know had you actually watched the hearings
.
8 Feb 2024 5:11 pm
ConsRule » 08 Feb 2024, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑ An insurrection is a criminal matter because Congress codified it into the US Code. Congress does not have the authority to conduct criminal investigations and the only criminal referral they have the authority to make is contempt of Congress. And even that one rarely result in actual charges. Thus, the findings of the Piglosi Political Circus has no bearing on anything. The can declare what happened on J6 is a banana...that doesn't mean it can be pealed and eaten.
Who, present at the events in the WH on the days in question, did NOT testify to the Committee?Thus, the findings of the Piglosi Political Circus has no bearing on anything
8 Feb 2024 5:15 pm
The "Committee" was a dog and pony show, and nothing more.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Who, present at the events in the WH on the days in question, did NOT testify to the Committee?
Complete with weeping and hugs and kisses and all the rest.
Like a Hallmark movie.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 5:16 pm
Now try to answer the question, Toady....RedheadedStranger » 08 Feb 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ The "Committee" was a dog and pony show, and nothing more.
Complete with weeping and hugs and kisses and all the rest.
Like a Hallmark movie.
8 Feb 2024 5:21 pm
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 5:32 pm
8 Feb 2024 5:33 pm
Don't know...don't care.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Who, present at the events in the WH on the days in question, did NOT testify to the Committee?
It was nothing more than political theater and a huge waste of programming time...IMO
8 Feb 2024 5:45 pm
Then perhaps your opinion isn't worth sharing.ConsRule » 08 Feb 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't know...don't care.
It was nothing more than political theater and a huge waste of programming time...IMO
8 Feb 2024 5:47 pm
I'll share them if I wish...you are free to ignore them.
8 Feb 2024 6:09 pm
Or share my opinion of your reasoning.
Who characterized the hearings for you?
8 Feb 2024 6:10 pm
8 Feb 2024 6:36 pm
With subpoena power ....
I wonder what they and America will find heading into November ......
8 Feb 2024 6:38 pm
"Dog and pony show" is a colloquial term which has come to mean a highly promoted, often over-staged performance, presentation, or event designed to sway or convince opinion for political, or less often, commercial ends. Typically, the term is used in a pejorative sense to connote disdain, jocular lack of appreciation, or distrust of the message being presented or the efforts undertaken to present it
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_and_pony_show
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 7:48 pm
You are describing something you haven't seen...RedheadedStranger » 08 Feb 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ "Dog and pony show" is a colloquial term which has come to mean a highly promoted, often over-staged performance, presentation, or event designed to sway or convince opinion for political, or less often, commercial ends. Typically, the term is used in a pejorative sense to connote disdain, jocular lack of appreciation, or distrust of the message being presented or the efforts undertaken to present it
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_and_pony_show
Who told you?
8 Feb 2024 7:48 pm
Majik » 08 Feb 2024, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ With subpoena power ....
I wonder what they and America will find heading into November ......
8 Feb 2024 7:56 pm
Did you watch the roast of Joe Xiden that aired an hour ago?
9 Feb 2024 7:32 am
No...he's on first base.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Or share my opinion of your reasoning.
Who characterized the hearings for you?
Who is online
In total there are 3109 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 3084 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Fuelman
Bots: MQQBrowser, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, proximic, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot