List the crimes, ****.Beekeeper » 10 Feb 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ No BLUFF, ****!!!
14th Amendment gives EQUAL TREATMENT to ALL Americans, including LAWBREAKERS!! That INSURES EQUAL JUSTICE!! And there is absolutely ZERO way you can say byeDUMB got EQUAL TREATMENT as TRUMP for IDENTIALLY the same acts!!!
The BIG difference is Trump has the Presidential Records Act that SHIELDS HIS ACTS FROM ANY CRIMINAL PROSECUTION!! Your boy byeDUMB didn't!!
Wait for the ENIRE "documents" case to be COMPLETELY TOSSED in Floriua!!
Now, **** YOURSELF AND THEN GO OFF YOURSELF!! YOU LOST!!
Beekeeper » 10 Feb 2024, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ 17 CHAPTERS of CRIMINAL ACTS BY BIDEN. Read it yourself, ASSSUCK!!
Report on the Investigation Into Unauthorized Removal, Retention, and Disclosure of Classified Documents Discovered at Locatinos Including the Penn Biden Center and the Delaware Private Residence of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (washingtonpost.com)
Despite the claims of Greasy Joe, it appears he was actually in possession of classified and highly classified material, some of which was listed as top secret. He was never in a political position where he was authorised to even view such material - much less have possession of it. Also, despite his claims, it was not all secured in lock-up cabinets, as even the highest levels of intellectual dishonesty CNN has to offer, would struggle to list Joe's garage floor as a lock-up cabinet (there are photos).
Does it make you feel less of a rube?JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ Despite the claims of Greasy Joe, it appears he was actually in possession of classified and highly classified material, some of which was listed as top secret. He was never in a political position where he was authorised to even view such material - much less have possession of it. Also, despite his claims, it was not all secured in lock-up cabinets, as even the highest levels of intellectual dishonesty CNN has to offer, would struggle to list Joe's garage floor as a lock-up cabinet (there are photos).
Greasy Joe was fully aware he had this stuff - he'd possessed it for years - it was not volunteered for surrender in all that time. The search and subsequent heart-felt admission of possession, was little more than theatrical political strategy, firstly to get him out of the career-destroying hole he then found himself in, and secondly to cast more cloud across the nature of Trump's possession of documents. It was very effective, but we all understand what it was and why it was done - it had nothing to do with integrity or honesty, quite the opposite. So yes, Greasy Joe is absolutely guilty of the same crimes, to a degree where the differences are if not close to zero - then they're very actually zero
Fondler,Beekeeper » 11 Feb 2024, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ Trust me, we KNOW you are illiterate and incapable of reading and comprehending written words.
Get your mommy to read it to you.
Trump can't "dismiss" anything.Beekeeper » 11 Feb 2024, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ Trust me, we KNOW you are illiterate and incapable of reading and comprehending written words.
Get your mommy to read it to you.
Maybe, rather than insulting me, you might want to take a look at the facts presented, and introspectively question how you've ended up defending today, that which you lambasted and criminalised yesterday. If Trump should be jailed, then why not Biden?
I don't owe your fancies ****...JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe, rather than insulting me, you might want to take a look at the facts presented, and introspectively question how you've ended up defending today, that which you lambasted and criminalised yesterday. If Trump should be jailed, then why not Biden?
Heavens above.. it's already been presented. Your response was to ask me if what I presented made me feel 'less of a rube'. So there's little point in presenting reasoned arguments, nor short-form it would seem. So what would you like next?R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ I don't owe your fancies ****...
If you can present an argument, with specifics, get back to me.
I'm not down with the narrative style.JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ Heavens above.. it's already been presented. Your response was to ask me if what I presented made me feel 'less of a rube'. So there's little point in presenting reasoned arguments, nor short-form it would seem. So what would you like next?
Yes I do see that your responses are very short. I can't discuss a topic, by merely exchanging slogans and insults. If a person does not even attempt to expose their points fully and transparently, there's nothing to discuss - they're wasting everyone's time
If you're characterizing your own effort.JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ Yes I do see that your responses are very short. I can't discuss a topic, by merely exchanging slogans and insults. If a person does not even attempt to expose their points fully and transparently, there's nothing to discuss - they're wasting everyone's time
Multiple points made, yet you've disputed none of them - just called me a rube. Your debating conduct is disgracefulR.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ If you're characterizing your own effort.
I characterize it as long on slogan, short on fact.
If you believe so, list the 3 most relevant in concise bullet points.JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Multiple points made, yet you've disputed none of them - just called me a rube. Your debating conduct is disgraceful
Are you incapable of dealing with a paragraph or two of text?R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ If you believe so, list the 3 most relevant in concise bullet points.
Squatchman » 11 Feb 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ Trump can't "dismiss" anything.
He's the defendant.
The title of your thread is **** from the lack of understanding you display on a regular basis.
Now,who needs the reading lesson?
You did in the title.