remember, squatboi is trying to play cards without a full deck...Beekeeper » 11 Feb 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ No one said Trump could "dismiss", but gives him a WAY TO DISMISS this ****!! That being through LEGAL MEANS, ****!!
Seems it is YOU that needs a COMPRHENSION LESSON OR 1324.
Now, run along little child before your mommy has to come get you from the mean bullies that KICK YOUR ***!!
run ****, RUN!!!
"do as they say and not as they do..."PhiloBeddo » 11 Feb 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Why do Dems keep getting found guilty of a crime and let off. Biden and Clinton. Hard evidence and complete investigation, yet still let go. WTF.
swayve's nothing but a POS...JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ > I've seen your answer.
Excellent
>I don't wade through youtube dreck..
No one asked you to. I gave you a precise time in the vid that provided CNN commentators going through precisely the points I've mentioned. That is not YouTube dreck, that is CNN.. Your goddess news channel..
Seriously. You won't read anything, you won't watch anything either - but it's incumbent upon others to provide you with answers that filter through your own constructed narrow strictures that deny the possibility of answers.. kek
>If it is your source for the answers post them and then we can debate them.
Done so .. CNN.. Do you not like CNN? .. You didn't know my source was CNN, because you won't look at the answers to your questions.
****...R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You either do or do not know the details.
If you don't, I have no interest in exchanging slogans with you....
If you do, post the answers to my questions. Commit them to "paper".
I don't want to be obliged to extract them from a video.
It won't say what he wants to hear crushing his fragile ego...JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ What we've established:I did the extraction from video for you - you just had to sit there and watch CNN explain nearly all the points I had. You have answers in abundance.
- If I write the points, you won't read them because 'narrative'
- If I post CNN stating it on video, you won't watch because you hate all that YouTube **** - and it's not committed to paper - like a narrative
cuz he's a ******...JustinSane » 11 Feb 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I've restated my questions and points at your request, multiple times. Why are you reticent to extend me the same courtesy?
he did ****....R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ That you would post the answers to the question.
I knew it was a long shot.
yet you post **** behind paywalls...R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ with what part of
"I'm not looking for your answers in a youtube video"
are you struggling?
Kicking your *** requires no "tough guy", but that's pure child's play.Squatchman » 11 Feb 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ You did in the title.
Now what bitch?
Still want to try and kick my *** tough guy?
You see how twisted humanity sustains realities within a species naturally limited to living as eternally separated when adapting to the moment here specifically as adapting to the moment here.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Since bye-DUMB got off scot free for IDENTICALLY what Trump was charged criminally with, it's OBVIOUS that there is a 2 tiered justice system in this nation- one for Dems and toss the book at Republicans.
THAT ALONE is more than grounds to have Trumps case completely and totally dismissed on PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT since bye-DUMB walks scot free. You can't give ONE A PASS and not the other!!
I imagine a lot of LWNJs are going to be TOTALLY PISSED in about a month or so when TRUMP's CHARGES ARE TOTALLY DISMISSED ON GROUNDS THAT THE PROSECUTION IS USING "selective" prosecution without merit!!
Can you LOSERS whine for us in advance???
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ROG62 » 11 Feb 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ remember, squatboi is trying to play cards without a full deck...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/Beekeeper » 12 Feb 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ Rapist?? Gee that's cute seeing how you have NOTHING you can point to that shows him convicted of any "rape" you claim.
Run along snuffy before you get YOUR *** kicked again.
Because the jurors rendered their May verdict in a civil case, they were asked only whether Carroll proved her allegation was probably true. In a criminal case, prosecutors would need to prove the allegation beyond a reasonable doubt.R.Suave » 12 Feb 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
Shut the **** up, Fondler.
Wanna try AGAIN, ****????R.Suave » 12 Feb 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
Shut the **** up, Fondler.
It's probability is supported by $90 million in judgement.Beekeeper » 12 Feb 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ Because the jurors rendered their May verdict in a civil case, they were asked only whether Carroll proved her allegation was probably true. In a criminal case, prosecutors would need to prove the allegation beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now SHUT THE **** UP, ****!!
You fail to understand the point the judge is making.Beekeeper » 12 Feb 2024, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ Wanna try AGAIN, ****????
Under New York criminal law, an assault constitutes "rape" only if it involves vaginal penetration by a penis. That was the definition the jury was instructed to use in the civil case.
By responding "no" to the question of whether Carroll proved Trump raped her, the jurors indicated they weren't convinced Trump penetrated Carroll with his penis, according to Kaplan, who first wrote about the issue in July when he denied Trump a new trial in the sexual abuse case.
Not for rape, ****!!R.Suave » 12 Feb 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ It's probability is supported by $90 million in judgement.
What have you got?