Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Taiwan would not last five minutes against china. And polls by agenda groups are useless.
The taiwanese would have to be retarded to keep trusting DC - and retards need looking after.
If it continues, then China owes the shortbussers some unrequested assistance.
You see no reason. I see no reason. Sane people see no reason.jerrab » 11 Feb 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ I see no reason to give taiwan weapons to fight against china which would be as diasterous as ukraine.
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/02/10/c ... ar-future/
An invasion of Taiwan is not worth the risk to Beijing. It would be wise for China not to underestimate the will of the Taiwanese people to defend their territory. A recent poll by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy shows that 72.5% of Taiwanese are willing to fight for the island if China tries forceful unification. As long as Taiwan doesn’t openly declare independence, China will not risk military action in Taiwan. The cost of invasion is not just high, it is not in China’s interest or the preferred method of reunification. In a meeting with Biden regarding Taiwan, President Xi said “We have patience and will strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification with utmost sincerity and efforts”. A poll by National Chengchi University suggests a majority of Taiwanese citizens want to maintain the status quo with China. Altering the status quo for political motives is not in China’s interest. Thus, maybe Taiwan is that scenario where doing nothing is the best option. The world is keeping a keen eye on Taiwan, watching the events unfold.
-------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
==========================================
don't let america escaluate tensions in taiwan.

Huey » 11 Feb 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I am sorry, I did not mean to instigate you into a hissy fit.

Truth is only relative to human behavior cradle to grave as social consensus recited as ancestrally practiced since dawn of civilization.Sumela » 11 Feb 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ :lol: :lol:
An embarrassing little man.
He takes all sides, both sides, the middle, outside...just not plain truth presented to him.
are you married?Sumela » 10 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Well not ancestrally, but in terms of divisive genetics and
social gardening by the progeny of the ancient wise ones
I will be a both sides forever fencewalker. Sides are sides
are sides to be parsed by only the offspring of Cheneyites.
The Chosen Ones.
![]()
![]()
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yes, harassing China through taiwan is DC policy.jerrab » 11 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I on't think taiwan wants any trouble from china. the first I heard about weapons to taiwan was right after china tried to implement a peace plan for ukraine and then all of a sudden biden wants to give weapons to taiwan.
when are you going to be honest about whom is harassing who by proxy? Dictatorships vs democracy ruled by policy, not people. But those legislating legalities and ethics created the options those governed to believe now isn't eternity pay to be protected from anyone instinctively knowing what went wrong historically to date in every social community under the umbrella of saving tomorrow's children today arriving one at a time replacing the 30 that are directly related to their conception happening now.Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, harassing China through taiwan is DC policy.
It won't end well for the empire.

https://i.gifer.com/87D.gif
or the oriental dynasty.Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, harassing China through taiwan is DC policy.
It won't end well for the empire.
