FIFY...RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ That ******* asked me a question, and then asked what my answer had to do with the OP.
He gets upset when you don't answer his questions, and gets upset when do too.
What a **** assclown....
nod...
the boi suffers from TDS, FNCDS, sporting an 80's pornstar mustache while his main source is vanity fair's society page...RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ We don't even own a TV you idiot.
What's "obvious" is that you are a very sheltered 70 year old man that has lost touch with how the world works and are bitter about getting left behind. Your "world view" comes from CNN and Vanity Fair for crying out loud.
You seem unreasonably obsessed with FOX News... and not in a healthy way.
Seek help.
RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ CNN, Vanity Fair, and Bloomberg
Crazy huh?
![]()
(I don't have "three main sources" dumb ***. That's only for narrow minded **** like you)

It looks like you still have that virus, Last Word
Melt down elsewhere.Huey » 10 Feb 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ It looks like you still have that virus, Last Word
That is just an extension of what you do when you learn of people's occupation, schooling, medical issues, or anything else. You use to divert and mock so you don't have to refute what they are saying.
Like I know your fear of boats and ships. But I rarely mention it. I do discuss your eye handicap that prevents you from accurately firing a gun but that is only when you start in on me. You hate your game being used against you.
Yap anything.
Last worditis is real in you Rico...R.Suave » 10 Feb 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ Yap anything.
Back to the subject.
Can you define the numerator and denominator of the LFPR?
THAT'S "owning".
You don't even understand life is self evident, how can you own another ancestor that doesn't believe life is self evident?
R.Suave » 10 Feb 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ Yap anything.
Back to the subject.
Can you define the numerator and denominator of the LFPR?
THAT'S "owning".
That is EXACTLY what "owning" is.Huey » 10 Feb 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Not really. What is owning you is the fact you can not refute my post. That is owning you. Now run along. Unless you can refute article I am done with this thread and you will have to get your triple digit daily posts without me.
he won't as you both work around how actual evolving happens in plain sight. You both are defending the narrative now isn't eternity and genetics eternally separates each reproduction alive now.Huey » 10 Feb 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Not really. What is owning you is the fact you can not refute my post. That is owning you. Now run along. Unless you can refute article I am done with this thread and you will have to get your triple digit daily posts without me.
Pot... meet kettle...R.Suave » 10 Feb 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ That is EXACTLY what "owning" is.
You folded right out of the gate. Posted something you don't even understand. Ran.....and then claimed "victory"...
You're one sadly deluded bitch.
You have posted nothing but your rants about “ou don’t understand”. As usual you can’t refute an article so you hide with questions.R.Suave » 10 Feb 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ That is EXACTLY what "owning" is.
You folded right out of the gate. Posted something you don't even understand. Ran.....and then claimed "victory"...
You're one sadly deluded bitch.
I asked you a question SPECIFICALLY about your citation.Huey » 10 Feb 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ You have posted nothing but your rants about “ou don’t understand”. As usual you can’t refute an article so you hide with questions.
Dont bother me again with your ignorance unless you have presented a case, Triple D.
Not **** likely.
I'm sure he answered and you just didn't like the answer...R.Suave » 10 Feb 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ I asked you a question SPECIFICALLY about your citation.
You have posted nothing in answer to it.