Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm

The wife and I are part time community advocates with a local organization and are constantly working with "kids" between the ages of 19 and 25 navigate adulthood.

We've fostered a few kids too, years ago, but we've gotten a bit old for that now.

It's called getting in the trenches... something you probably know no nothing about.

How does that bear on the subject?

You posted a citation demonstrating that kids are living with their parents while indulging in personal luxuries...in some effort to address the point of the OP..

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 12:58 pm

Help   figure out where he went so terribly wrong..

I have posted this before and I will post it again.  You are incapable of refuting a post.  And you mean where Forbes went so horribly wrong.  

Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm

I have posted this before and I will post it again.  You are incapable of refuting a post.  And you mean where Forbes went so horribly wrong.

I'm in the process of doing so, mathematically....the shortest route.

But it requires you having the vaguest idea what you're talking about.

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm

How does that bear on the subject?

You posted a citation demonstrating that kids are living with their parents while indulging in personal luxuries...in some effort to address the point of the OP..

Are these your words?

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 12:49 pm

But Jeanine Pirro is here to describe Real America to you...

whose kids?

Mine is 25, hasn't asked for a dime since she got her sign on bonus more than 2 years ago.

Her boyfriend, 28, worked his way up the Texas system from JUCO to Austin, and is also the top engineer in his class at their Samsung plant.

Nod

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 12:39 pm

what are the numerator and the denominator of the LFPR?

That is all explained in the link from Forbes. And remember, I don't do you work or duplicate work because you are lazy. 

Vegas » 09 Feb 2024, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:03 pm

5

You can't...

We both know.
 

Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm

That is all explained in the link from Forbes. And remember, I don't do you work or duplicate work because you are lazy.

Nononono...

If you understood the math, you wouldn't have gone here.

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm

I'm in the process of doing so, mathematically....the shortest route.

But it requires you having the vaguest idea what you're talking about.

And that is the reason I will never discuss firearms again.  You will be asked to post your personal experience with any weapon being discussed.  You don't have the vaguest idea what you're talking about.

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm

Are these your words?

Nod

Yes.

And?
 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm

Nononono...

If you understood the math, you wouldn't have gone here.


 

 

I accept your surrender.  
 

Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:16 pm

And that is the reason I will never discuss firearms again.  You will be asked to post your personal experience with any weapon being discussed.  You don't have the vaguest idea what you're talking about.

We can examine the short route in that regard later...

Can you define the terms in question?

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:13 pm

You can't...

We both know.

You obviously can't since you have no thoughts about yourself. You just have copy/pasted ****. 

And of course, you send me to ask someone else, as always. 

Never your own thoughts. Ever. 

Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm

I accept your surrender.

you ran.

To whom need I surrender?

Vegas » 09 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm

You obviously can't since you have no thoughts about yourself. You just have copy/pasted ****. 

And of course, you send me to ask someone else, as always. 

Never your own thoughts. Ever.

The minute you two idiots acknowledge your ignorance

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:16 pm

Yes.

And?

My post was in reference to a question you asked.

That question being...

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 12:56 pm

So how do you know about it?

Your words.

First, you get pissed if I don't answer your questions, and then when I do, you ask why I answered your question.

I've told you before Rico, your gaslighting won't work on me. 

You're an amateur at this **** actually.

Work on it.

 

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm

The minute you two idiots acknowledge your ignorance

6

Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.

1. Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples). 
2. "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful. 
3. Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 
4. "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
5. Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
6. Projection
7. "You are lying"  = You are lying by saying I am lying.
8. Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die. 
9. Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm

you ran.

To whom need I surrender?

I'm here.

I am patiently waiting for you to make your case.  You don't need my help to make it.  Go check numbers 5, 6, and 7 on the chart. 
 

Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm

I'm here.

I am patiently waiting for you to make your case.  You don't need my help to make it.  Go check numbers 5, 6, and 7 on the chart.

That ******* asked me a question, and then asked what my answer had to do with the OP.

He gets upset when you don't answer his questions, and gets upset when do too.

What a **** clown.


 

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm

That ******* asked me a question, and then asked what my answer had to do with the OP.

He gets upset when you don't answer his questions, and gets upset when do too.

What a **** clown.


 

 

Today may be a 150 plus post day for him. 

Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm

I'm here.

I am patiently waiting for you to make your case.  You don't need my help to make it.  Go check numbers 5, 6, and 7 on the chart.

Then define the terms.

You don't need my help to make it. 

I do.

The point is that you yapped that citation reflexively, without understanding that it supports my argument.