That doesn't tell me how you know the reasons kids are doing something today.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ My post was in reference to a question you asked.
That question being...
Your words.
First, you get pissed if I don't answer your questions, and then when I do, you ask why I answered your question.
I've told you before Rico, your gaslighting won't work on me.
You're an amateur at this **** actually.
Work on it.
That's crazy.
Vegas » 09 Feb 2024, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL! Trust me. We know you don't read. 4 words is your max for anything.

How many notifications?
I am beginning to seriously question your comprehension skills Rico.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ That doesn't tell me how you know the reasons kids are doing something today.
You "know" this because idiots on FOX labor it.
Simple logic, Country.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I am beginning to seriously question your comprehension skills Rico.
You may want to talk to your neurologist about that ****.
As I've stated before, just because you don't like the answer given, it doesn't mean it's not an answer just the same.
If it doesn't address the question, it's a response.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ As I've stated before, just because you don't like the answer given, it doesn't mean it's not an answer just the same.
You asked me how I knew the mindset of younger adults today, and I gave you a valid answer... that you promptly discounted because you didn't like it.
You've got some serious issues buddy. No wonder your almost 70 and single and your kid has nothing to do with you.
You've earned it.
3
Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.
- Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples).
- "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful.
- Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam.
- "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
- Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
- Projection
- "You are lying" = You are lying by saying I am lying.
- Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die.
- Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
No, I directly answered your question.
...and I answered...
You didn't like my answer so you took a hard turn in a different direction like usual.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The wife and I are part time community advocates with a local organization and are constantly working with "kids" between the ages of 19 and 25 navigate adulthood.
We've fostered a few kids too, years ago, but we've gotten a bit old for that now.
It's called getting in the trenches... something you probably know no nothing about.
RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I directly answered your question.
The context of the conversation was about the spending habits of young adults today, and you asked...
...and I answered...
You didn't like my answer so you took a hard turn in a different direction like usual.
Now call that a "retelling" and pat yourself on the back like always.
![]()
You obfuscate and lie.
Keep twisting shorty.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't try to run that **** on me, Country....
Read the thread title, and the OP....
Do I have to do this, again?RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep twisting shorty.
You lost... again.
Deal with it
You do you buddy.
You see **** that isn't there.