Liberal Forum

Vegas » 09 Feb 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 12:20 pm

No thoughts, etc...Copy/paste from libtard source. 
Bloomberg:  :rofl:  

Veghead's idea of intelligent thoughts are sarcasm.  :rofl:   :rofl:   

50% accurate. Intellect isn't 100% intelligence. Only 10%

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm

You prevaricate.

I demonstrate.

You demonstrated that you admitted that pic to be a lie on your behalf, per the deal. 

That's what you get for not reading before you agree to something. 

QED. 
 

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm

You see **** that isn't there.

I'm serious... you need to talk to your neurologist before this **** gets worse.

Wouldn't it be much easier to admit the obvious?

Specifically, like many members of your demographic slice, you lack the attention span for thought, so you watch FOX to stimulate one of the few responses that isn't too atrophied from years of riding the barcalounger watching FOX - Hysteria.
 

Vegas » 09 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm

You demonstrated that you admitted that pic to be a lie on your behalf, per the deal. 

That's what you get for not reading before you agree to something. 

QED.

No...I demonstrated that you don't read posts...

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:59 pm

You do you buddy.

I could care less.

You still lost. Nothing will change that.

Do you continue to believe Grifty is POTUS?

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm

How many notifications?

Don't really care.

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 1:33 pm

Then define the terms.


I do.

The point is that you yapped that citation reflexively, without understanding that it supports my argument.

 

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm

No...I demonstrated that you don't read posts...

Already established that you didn't. Mistake vs lie. 

This is why I made the list here. **** all this revisiting past ****. Over and over. It's a narcissist thing. You retards love to revisit ****. 


10

Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.

1. Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples). 
2. "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful. 
3. Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 
4. "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
5. Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
6. Projection
7. "You are lying"  = You are lying by saying I am lying.
8. Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die. 
9. Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
10. Revisiting the same **** over and over: 60k greenies or STFU

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm

Wouldn't it be much easier to admit the obvious?

Specifically, like many members of your demographic slice, you lack the attention span for thought, so you watch FOX to stimulate one of the few responses that isn't too atrophied from years of riding the barcalounger watching FOX - Hysteria.

We don't even own a TV you idiot.

What's "obvious" is that you are a very sheltered 70 year old man that has lost touch with how the world works and are bitter about getting left behind. Your "world view" comes from CNN and Vanity Fair for crying out loud.

You seem unreasonably obsessed with FOX News... and not in a healthy way.

Seek help.
 
 


 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:07 pm

Do you continue to believe Grifty is POTUS?

Relevance?
 

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:11 pm

We don't even own a TV you idiot.

What's "obvious" is that you are a very sheltered 70 year old man that has lost touch with how the world works and are bitter about getting left behind. Your "world view" comes from CNN and Vanity Fair for crying out loud.

You seem unreasonably obsessed with FOX News... and not in a healthy way.

Seek help.
 

You are conspicuously coy about your sources of information....

I am not.

My world view comes from paying attention to the data, and supplementing it with informed analysis and opinion. Of course. I also do my own shopping, as I have for the past 45 years.

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:19 pm

Relevance?

The degree to which you privilege your faith over facts.

Nod.

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:22 pm

The degree to which you privilege your faith over facts.

Nod.

That makes absolutely no sense.
 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm

You are conspicuously coy about your sources of information....

I am not.

My world view comes from paying attention to the data, and supplementing it with informed analysis and opinion. Of course. I also do my own shopping, as I have for the past 45 years.

           You read CNN and Bloomberg, and you say this? 

You are one dumb ****.


1. "Name your sources"....refer to number 5 Mr Predicatble. 

Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.

1. Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples). 
2. "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful. 
3. Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 
4. "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
5. Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
6. Projection
7. "You are lying"  = You are lying by saying I am lying.
8. Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die. 
9. Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.

 

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm

You are conspicuously coy about your sources of information....

I am not.

My world view comes from paying attention to the data, and supplementing it with informed analysis and opinion. Of course. I also do my own shopping, as I have for the past 45 years.

I post links to every article or excerpt I paste on this forum.

Every... last... one.

Now explain to me how that's "being coy" about my sources.

C'mon man.

Do better.
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:23 pm

That makes absolutely no sense.

It makes perfect sense...

We have a Zola-esque feuilleton working its way up the chain at a major media company as evidence of its force.

 

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm

I post links to every article or excerpt I paste on this forum.

Every... last... one.

Now explain to me how that's "being coy" about my sources.

C'mon man.

Do better.

Watch


Post your 3 primary sources of "news & analysis"

Vegas » 09 Feb 2024, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:24 pm

           You read CNN and Bloomberg, and you say this? 

You are one dumb ****.

1. "Name your sources"....refer to number 5 Mr Predicatble.

Share your fee-fees about that....

R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:28 pm

Watch

Post your 3 primary sources of "news & analysis"

CNN, Vanity Fair, and Bloomberg

Crazy huh?

 
 
 
(I don't have "three main sources" dumb ***. That's only for narrow minded **** like you)
 

RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2024, 2:31 pm

CNN, Vanity Fair, and Bloomberg

Crazy huh?

QED

Why do you think making my point is funny?

I can see why I would.....