Have you ever seen me copy and paste an excerpt or article on this forum without linking it back to the source?R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ QED
Why do you think making my point is funny?
I can see why I would.....
I just asked you a very direct question...RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Have you ever seen me copy and paste an excerpt or article on this forum without linking it back to the source?
Nope.
There is your answer Einstein.
The last time I answered one of your questions you got pissed and said it was off topic so... **** your questions.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ I just asked you a very direct question...
You ran..
I don't care what you spot cite...I want you to admit to what you eyeguzzle.
That is just an extension of what you do when you learn of people's occupation, schooling, medical issues, or anything else. You use to divert and mock so you don't have to refute what they are saying.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ I just asked you a very direct question...
You ran..
I don't care what you spot cite...I want you to admit to what you eyeguzzle.
Reducing post count.Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ That is just an extension of what you do when you learn of people's occupation, schooling, medical issues, or anything else. You use to divert and mock so you don't have to refute what they are saying.
Like I know your fear of boats and ships. But I rarely mention it. I do discuss your eye handicap that prevents you from accurately firing a gun but that is only when you start in on me. You hate your game being used against you.
Never, ever, fails.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ The last time I answered one of your questions you got pissed and said it was off topic so... **** your questions.
Besides I did answer you, and as usual, you didn't like the answer so you ignored it.
2 and 5
Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.
- Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples).
- "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful.
- Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam.
- "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
- Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
- Projection
- "You are lying" = You are lying by saying I am lying.
- Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die.
- Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
No, it doesn't.
Call you out easily, yes...
You haven't called out anything Rico.R.Suave » 09 Feb 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Call you out easily, yes...
But it isn't as if your type is all that nuanced.
And yet you won't answer that question, either.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You have called out anything Rico.
All you've accomplished is looking more foolish today than you did yesterday... and tomorrow will be more of the same.
You should ask Brown for a refund, because they failed you horribly.
It doesn't matter, because even if I do, you'll act like I didn't because you didn't like the answer... and you'll just ask it again.
No...because the criteria for "answer" are clear.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't matter, because even if I do, you'll act like I didn't because you didn't like the answer... and you'll just ask it again.
That's your schtick.
Everybody here knows this Rico.
The jig is up.
Your criteria aren't the same as a normal person.
That's ****.RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Your criteria aren't the same as a normal person.
Sorry that the truth hurts so bad buddy.
List these "normal" criteria
Genetics results are living as eternally separating the ancestors currently adapting in space displaced since conceived. You loathe living uniquely you demanding everyone join social narrative or else.
It's because none of the libtards work...Huey » 09 Feb 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.forbes.com/sites/qai/2023/0 ... can%20help).
Unemployment Is Low, But So Is The Labor Force Participation Rate — What’s Going On In The U.S. Labor Market? Key takeawaysUnemployment is one of the most important measures that economists track to gauge the health of an economy. In general, low unemployment rates mean an economy is strong because most workers can find jobs.In the U.S., unemployment has remained relatively low over the past year despite concerns about an oncoming recession. However, low unemployment could be partially due to a low labor participation rate. This could be a bad sign for the economy moving forward (but Q.ai can help).
- Unemployment has consistently fallen since December 2021
- One factor behind declining unemployment could be a slow recovery in the labor force participation rate since the onset of COVID
- Labor force participation has been on a downward trend for decades due to an aging population and other factors
......
Though it has recovered somewhat, labor force participation remains below 62.5%, well off pre-pandemic highs. Some believe that low unemployment rates are partly due to the reduced size of the labor force and aren’t indicative of a strong economy.