It is solid .....
Beekeeper » 13 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Not to mention that the "classified document" case down in Florida isn't looking real good for Smith either. Seeing how he wants to keep witnesses names and their testimony from being released to the defense along with NOT allowing the defense to actually see what documents he is using to prosecute!!
THAT is a perfect storm for a Brady violation seeing how he MUST turn over all evidence or even unused evidence he built his case on. Judge Cannon isn't buying his **** either.
This is uninformed ****. Cannon wants to make the names public.Seeing how he wants to keep witnesses names and their testimony from being released to the defense
158 IQ?along with NOT allowing the defense to actually see what documents he is using to prosecute!!
It's **** garbage..Majik » 13 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ It is solid .....
Any other ruling by the SCOTUS except in Trump's favor regarding Presidential immunity would destroy our political system ....
care to debate that?
R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ This is uninformed ****. Cannon wants to make the names public.
158 IQ?
These would be the documents he took....that he was declining to turn over..
Why, if he had no idea what was in them?
R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ This is uninformed ****. Cannon wants to make the names public.
158 IQ?
These would be the documents he took....that he was declining to turn over..
Why, if he had no idea what was in them?
The tensions in the Mar-a-Lago case extend beyond the defense teams’ access to evidence. The special counsel’s office is seeking to keep secret from the public names of witnesses who could be called to testify against Trump at trial, saying witnesses could be harassedBeekeeper » 13 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Ivy league education?? SMITH IS THE HE that doesn't want names and testimony released, and Cannon is saying nope, not possible.
It doesn't matter if Trump knew what was in them or not, the FACTS ARE SIMPLE- the PROSECUTION must turn over ALL EVIDENCE IN A CRIMINAL CASE TO THE DEFENCE!! PERIOD!! Your "legal brilliance" is about as DULL as it gets, ****!!
Wow .R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ The tensions in the Mar-a-Lago case extend beyond the defense teams’ access to evidence. The special counsel’s office is seeking to keep secret from the public names of witnesses who could be called to testify against Trump at trial, saying witnesses could be harassed
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/12/politics ... index.html
Can you read that, ****?
No doubt...obviously cut from the same cloth...
What did they get wrong, Hole?
Beekeeper » 13 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you are quite oblivious to the FACTS here, Cannon is a WOMEN and the proper pronoun for that is "her", not "him".
I know that all this gender bender **** has you confused, but try to pay attention.
You are **** garbage ...with a mental illness ....
It's crap....because you're ignorant.Majik » 13 Feb 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You are **** garbage ...with a mental illness ....
The SCOTUS is not.....
They have millions of 80 IQ ****** convinced that MAGA means a return to slaveryPhiloBeddo » 13 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Another racist *** trying to get whitey. They will never learn.
Your *** isn't a source.....oops, I take that back.R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ What did they get wrong, Hole?
I could have pulled it from a number of sources.....they'd all confirm the same thing.....
**** imbecile....
It will be until you find the one Beefondler is reading
Since you are quite oblivious to the FACTS here, Cannon is a WOMEN and the proper pronoun for that is "her", not "him"Beekeeper » 13 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you are quite oblivious to the FACTS here, Cannon is a WOMEN and the proper pronoun for that is "her", not "him".
I know that all this gender bender **** has you confused, but try to pay attention.
R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot.
Cannon isn't accused of taking documents.
You can't read.....You're literally a cretin.

Beekeeper » 13 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No ****, you are the one with a COMPREHENSION problem. So put that "Ivy league education" to work and try harder!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even the CHILDREN know you are a **** LOSER PIECE OF **** IDIOT!!
So put that "Ivy league education" to work and try harder!!