Interesting, isn't it, that you, who have NO skin in this game would not "support" that bill, yet the National Border Control Council, whose members are on the front lines - at the border - of this border control crisis... which is the very definition of having a whole lot of SKIN in the **** game. THEY supported the bill. Donald Trump didn't, therefore, all the scrotum suckers - both in Congress and on this website - don't support it either. Suozzi supported the bill and told the folks of CD3 that he would vote for it. Mazi Pilip, a fellow scrotum sucker of yours, and the GOP candidate for Santos' seat was in lock step with you, and the same constituency that put a Republican in Congress in 2022, rejected the position of the brilliant lady your party chose to replace Nobel Prize Winner George Santos. Maybe you should wake up and smell the **** coffee. If you're serious about border control, don't kick the **** can down the road all the way until January of NEXT year.Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ You miss read me. I said legislative record.
And that is a lie. The bill does nothing to secure the border. It is all administrative actions.
And that is lie #2. I do care about securing the border. That is why I would not support that bill.
This bill would not have stopped them.
Mostly what they got done was to spend a lot of money we didn't have to spend on **** we didn't need to spend it on...maineman » 14 Feb 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ And they DID get a lot done. Biden's record of legislative accomplishment is not scant. And he had the Turtle - and a filibuster - standing in his way.
Don’t take this personally, but go **** yourself.maineman » 14 Feb 2024, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Interesting, isn't it, that you, who have NO skin in this game would not "support" that bill, yet the National Border Control Council, whose members are on the front lines - at the border - of this border control crisis... which is the very definition of having a whole lot of SKIN in the **** game. THEY supported the bill. Donald Trump didn't, therefore, all the scrotum suckers - both in Congress and on this website - don't support it either. Suozzi supported the bill and told the folks of CD3 that he would vote for it. Mazi Pilip, a fellow scrotum sucker of yours, and the GOP candidate for Santos' seat was in lock step with you, and the same constituency that put a Republican in Congress in 2022, rejected the position of the brilliant lady your party chose to replace Nobel Prize Winner George Santos. Maybe you should wake up and smell the **** coffee. If you're serious about border control, don't kick the **** can down the road all the way until January of NEXT year.
Maineman is totally clueless...Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Don’t take this personally, but go **** yourself.![]()
You are on e of the most clueless, alleged educated people on this forum. And that is quite an accomplishment on this forum.
Or go ahead explain exactly what that bill does to drastically reduce illegal border crossings. Your call.
which paragraph of the bill did they support? You always gloss over what they didn't like in the bill. You really have Mary Poppins in your head 24/7.maineman » 14 Feb 2024, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Interesting, isn't it, that you, who have NO skin in this game would not "support" that bill, yet the National Border Control Council, whose members are on the front lines - at the border - of this border control crisis... which is the very definition of having a whole lot of SKIN in the **** game. THEY supported the bill. Donald Trump didn't, therefore, all the scrotum suckers - both in Congress and on this website - don't support it either. Suozzi supported the bill and told the folks of CD3 that he would vote for it. Mazi Pilip, a fellow scrotum sucker of yours, and the GOP candidate for Santos' seat was in lock step with you, and the same constituency that put a Republican in Congress in 2022, rejected the position of the brilliant lady your party chose to replace Nobel Prize Winner George Santos. Maybe you should wake up and smell the **** coffee. If you're serious about border control, don't kick the **** can down the road all the way until January of NEXT year.
YOU SPENT 25 YEARS MOPPING FLOORS, JANITOR.maineman » 14 Feb 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Face it. since the clown's three SCOTUS picks helped overturn Roe, the GOP has either lost or drastically underperformed in every single election or referendum. Dobbs is the gift that keeps on giving. Add 91 criminal counts to Dobbs and what do you think the non-MAGA middle of the bell-curve independent is gonna think come November?
And tell me honestly, what do YOU think about the clown ENCOURAGING (his word) Russia to do whatever they want to do to NATO countries who are behind on their monetary support? Does that sit well with you? Me? I spent a quarter of a century trying to keep the Russians at bay. For a REPUBLICAN presidential candidate to be cozying up to their leader makes me nauseous.
THE JANITOR HAS SPENT 25 YEARS MOPPING FLOORS.BooRadley » 15 Feb 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ Maineman is totally clueless...
He's by far so past the word ignorant.
NASSAU COUNTIES FLOODING FROM THE FIVE BOROUGHS CHANGING THE BASE, HAS RUINED THAT PART OF LONG ISLAND MAKING IT LIKE ANOTHER **** THE FIVE BOROUGHS HAVE BECOME.maineman » 13 Feb 2024, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ George Santos' seat went to the Democrats. Tom Suozzi won HUGE.
That's gotta hurt!![]()
![]()
You shouldn't start threads and not be able to defend the responses to it.maineman » 13 Feb 2024, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ George Santos' seat went to the Democrats. Tom Suozzi won HUGE.
That's gotta hurt!![]()
![]()
Mopping floors is an honest day's work supporting every reality working against him or her. Shame you have this mind is greater than a brain adapting as displaced attitude.righteous » 15 Feb 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ YOU SPENT 25 YEARS MOPPING FLOORS, JANITOR.
AND POLITICALLY BAMBOOZLED FOR THE SAME AMOUNT OF YEARS
THAT STATEMENT REQUIRES THE DISPLAY OF YOUR IMAGENostradamus'omh » 15 Feb 2024, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Mopping floors is an honest day's work supporting every reality working against him or her. Shame you have this mind is greater than a brain adapting as displaced attitude.

So you supplied my image or your interpretation of my character should look like some legal functioning down syndrome individual with a birth defect of an extra protein or chromosome developed during gestation since conceived?
SHAME ON YOU TO INSULT YOUR OWN INTELLIGENCENostradamus'omh » 15 Feb 2024, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ So you supplied my image or your interpretation of my character should look like some legal functioning down syndrome individual with a birth defect of an extra protein or chromosome developed during gestation since conceived?
I cannot thank you enough for being true and loyal to your social narrative sustaining reasonable doubt about life as genetics eternally separates the ancestors occupying space physically here now.
Intelligence is knowing the difference between actually evolving and performing a reality, not defending hope, faith, charity to gain power, wealth, fame using power of suggestion to keep people subjective interpretations of tomorrow, today.
Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Don’t take this personally, but go **** yourself.![]()
You are on e of the most clueless, alleged [sic] educated people on this forum. And that is quite an accomplishment on this forum.
Or go ahead explain exactly what that bill does to drastically reduce illegal border crossings. Your call.
Because it's giving them more resources to allow these people to entermaineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ I would suggest you ask the National Border Control Council and the Senate Republicans why they DID support this bill if it didn't improve the situation. Let me know what they tell you.
Psssst. MY LITTLE BITCH, they said it was IMPERFECT to the core, but since they are a UNION, without any REAL SAY in the border crisis, they support it. WHY? Because it allows them to get MORE UNION MEMBERS rather than close the border. They need to rip off more STUPID IDIOTS that join their little UNION that is now MANDATORY since your boy Dullwit became POTUS.maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ I would suggest you ask the National Border Control Council and the Senate Republicans why they DID support this bill if it didn't improve the situation. Let me know what they tell you.
You could ask Senate Democrats why they did not support the House bill from last May:maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ I would suggest you ask the National Border Control Council and the Senate Republicans why they DID support this bill if it didn't improve the situation. Let me know what they tell you.
wow, revert to a chain of command working intellectual time management. Bet that leads to facts validating intellectual time management at keeping people ignoring life's limitations to adapting as displaced here now..maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ I would suggest you ask the National Border Control Council and the Senate Republicans why they DID support this bill if it didn't improve the situation. Let me know what they tell you.