Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:42 am

And, ONCE AGAIN, you demonstrate that you don't understand what your citations tell you.

Then stop running and make that case.

 

I absolutely understand what it is telling.  I am not the one demanding someone explain it for him.

But first you need to pick a stand.  So far you have taken three.

First it was corporate greed.  Then you made the argument your grocery prices are the same as in the past.  Now you are saying they ARE HIGHER, but it is the reason stated in the article.

Posting with you it is like playing a shell game or 3 card monte on the street.  Always changing.

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 10:21 am

Market Basket

https://www.shopmarketbasket.com/sites/ ... 24_web.pdf

Be certain to tell everyone what you see for the prices of the items I mentioned...

In this post you are arguing that prices are fine.  Yet you are saying prices are up, for a reason.  

Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:48 am

I absolutely understand what it is telling.  I am not the one demanding someone explain it for him.

But first you need to pick a stand.  So far you have taken three.

First it was corporate greed.  Then you made the argument your grocery prices are the same as in the past.  Now you are saying they ARE HIGHER, but it is the reason stated in the article.

Posting with you it is like playing a shell game or 3 card monte on the street.  Always changing.

Rico picks the narrative that best backs up his argument at the time...

As soon as that narrative gets slapped down, he moves on to the next one.

Rinse and repeat.

 
 

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 10:43 am

Every single time.

Punkass bitch.

 

But you are arguing prices are up for a reason.

RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:51 am

Rico picks the narrative that best backs up his argument at the time...

As soon as that narrative gets slapped down, he moves on to the next one.

Rinse and repeat.

 
 

 

Yup, that's Iceberg Slim/Blackvegetable/Retardo Smarmy/The5thJackass described perfectly.

Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:52 am

But you are arguing prices are up for a reason.

No paraphrasing....

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:54 am

No paraphrasing....

 

I'm good.  You need to pick a stand and stick with it. 

Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:55 am

I'm good.  You need to pick a stand and stick with it.

If I haven't taken a stand, why are you idiots whinging about my citations?

It is YOU who is declining to take a stand....

I'm asking you WHAT your citations say, you answer by telling me what you insist it DOESN'T say.
 

Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:52 am

But you are arguing prices are up for a reason.

No....you are insisting they are up for not some reasons...

Putting you in direct conflict with your citation.....again...

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:59 am

If I haven't taken a stand, why are you idiots whinging about my citations?

It is YOU who is declining to take a stand....

I'm asking you WHAT your citations say, you answer by telling me what you insist it DOESN'T say.

Your "stand" is that food prices are the same today as they were in 2019...

When asked to confirm this claim, you posted prices from today, and completely skipped the prices from 2019... and then tried to act like you "won".

That's just retarded dude... and everyone sees it.

Try harder.

 

 

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:59 am

If I haven't taken a stand, why are you idiots whinging about my citations?

It is YOU who is declining to take a stand....

I'm asking you WHAT your citations say, you answer by telling me what you insist it DOESN'T say.

I didn't say anything about your citations.  I just brought the facts from another (not FOX) citation.  ANd in midstream you changed your stance.

ANd you know what my citations says because you read it.  And it is different than what you and Biden say it is.

Is it because of corporate greed?

Is it because of climate change and supply chain issues?

Or is there NO INCREASE as you were arguing earlier in the thread?

 

Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:51 am

In this post you are arguing that prices are fine.  Yet you are saying prices are up, for a reason.

We are talking about food prices, and "inflation".

I just showed you a good reason why food prices are excluded from the "core".....

Were @ConsRule  and @Redheaded Stranger  not such pussies, they would have confirmed the prices I quoted. Then we could take 80% of those numbers and ask if we were buying these products for such prices in 2019.

But they are pussies.....just like you,

The point, however, is what YOUR CITATION is saying about it......which you obviously don't understand. 
 

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm

No....you are insisting they are up for not some reasons...

Putting you in direct conflict with your citation.....again...

 

I haven't insisted on anything.  I simply posted a citation that says food prices are up 25% and inflation is up 18% since Biden took office in response to you asking for numbers and arguing your prices are the same as 2019.  And yes, I posted your words.

My citation clearly says that corporate greed is not the reason.  Which is in direct conflict with what you have been whining about lately.  And you are in conflict with the citation because the citation is proof prices are up.  While you were arguing they were not.  

Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm

I didn't say anything about your citations.  I just brought the facts from another (not FOX) citation.  ANd in midstream you changed your stance.

ANd you know what my citations says because you read it.  And it is different than what you and Biden say it is.

Is it because of corporate greed?

Is it because of climate change and supply chain issues?

Or is there NO INCREASE as you were arguing earlier in the thread?

POST WHAT YOUR CITATION SAYS ABOUT IT.

Geebus....
 

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm

We are talking about food prices, and "inflation".

I just showed you a good reason why food prices are excluded from the "core".....

Were @ConsRule  and @Redheaded Stranger  not such pussies, they would have confirmed the prices I quoted. Then we could take 80% of those numbers and ask if we were buying these products for such prices in 2019.

But they are pussies.....just like you,

The point, however, is what YOUR CITATION is saying about it......which you obviously don't understand. 
 

 

Your meltdown continues. I understand that your argument, until today, was corporate greed was the reason.  Meaning you don't understand the reasons the citation states.  You were wrong.

Do these question sound like I don't understand the citation:

Is it because of corporate greed?

Is it because of climate change and supply chain issues?

Or is there NO INCREASE as you were arguing earlier in the thread?

RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 11:51 am

Rico picks the narrative that best backs up his argument at the time...

As soon as that narrative gets slapped down, he moves on to the next one.

Rinse and repeat.

I post a narrative consistent with available evidence.

You have strong feelings.
 

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:06 pm

POST WHAT YOUR CITATION SAYS ABOUT IT.

Geebus....
 

 

I have already posted the citation.  You want it posted, Meltdown Mary, you may post it at anytime.  

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm

I post a narrative consistent with available evidence.

You have strong feelings.
 

 

Your first narrative on this thread was there was nothing wrong with the prices because of your market basket shopping spree.  Which is in direct conflict with your previous argument that corporate greed is the reason for higher prices.  Then you quickly pivoted to what my citation says.  Multi Stance, pick one.  

R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm

I post a narrative consistent with available evidence.

You have strong feelings.

You pick a narrative that fits your **** at the time... and as soon as it's shot down, you pick a different narrative.

Just the facts ma'am.
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2024, 12:11 pm

You lost a narrative that fits your **** at the time... and as soon as it's shot down, you pick a different narrative.

Just the facts ma'am.

Post specific elements with which you take issue...

Or run.