Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ And another source only points out Roy Cohn
I guess you did not see the game. That's right, you don't have "cable" or streaming services.
Sez you...RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ One of these men with Roy Cohn is Donald Trump, and the other is not...
![]()
... it's not complicated.
Not painful... just the truth.
RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Not painful... just the truth.
That's why you can't deal with it.
Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ Sure it is. We have only two sources for the photo. One claims it is Roy Cohn and Donald Trump. The other only labels it with Roy Cohn. Why would a journalist not label it with Donald Trump? Because they can't verify who it is or they know for certain it is not.
Your welcome.
You just keep losing Rico.
Do a Google search for "Vanity Fair inaccuracies" and tell me what you find.R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ We have plenty.
VF is an entirely credible source and the image is fully attributed.
You have nothing but denial.
R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ We have plenty.
VF is an entirely credible source and the image is fully attributed.
You have nothing but denial.
RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Do a Google search for "Vanity Fair inaccuracies" and tell me what you find.
They aren't quite the "credible" source you claim they hey are.
Not even close.
We have plenty.Huey » 14 Feb 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ We do not have plenty. We have had TWO sources for that pic. One claims it is trump and the other doesn't mention him.
You have a Vanity Fair Society page caption and "blue eyes".R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ We have plenty.
VF is an entirely credible source and the image is fully attributed.
You have nothing but denial.
RedheadedStranger » 14 Feb 2024, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ You just keep losing Rico.
It seems as though enjoy it.
LOL
Neither do logic and reason apparently.
R.Suave » 14 Feb 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ We have plenty.
Your second source is irrelevant.
You have nothing.
Say it.
you believe your eyes, I understand your words aren't completely accurate about anything specific.