Liberal Forum

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:19 am

I'll answer.  You answer first.

It doesn't work like that. I asked you simple questions. You deflected. Period. 

You are a pedo. **** your little games. 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:40 am

It doesn't work like that. I asked you simple questions. You deflected. Period. 

You are a pedo. **** your little games.

I asked you a simple question.  Why the label without evidence?

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:40 am

It doesn't work like that. I asked you simple questions. You deflected. Period. 

You are a pedo. **** your little games.

Now who does that sound like Vegas?

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:19 am

I'll answer.  You answer first.

 
 

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:42 am

I asked you a simple question.  Why the label without evidence?

I didn't put the label, ask the mod. I don't have that power. I was simply seeing if it was true. 

You proved it to be true. 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:43 am

I didn't put the label, ask the mod. I don't have that power. I was simply seeing if it was true. 

You proved it to be true.

I did ask him.  He won't answer.  Do you think it's right to label someone without evidence or asking them?

 

RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:42 am

Now who does that sound like Vegas?

Ohhhhhhh ****. You are right. That went through my mind, but I ignored my instinct. 

I shouldn't have done that. 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:43 am

You proved it to be true.

I proved it?  lol

 
 

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:44 am

I did ask him.  He won't answer.  Do you think it's right to label someone without evidence or asking them?

Holy ****. You are R.Suave. You don't answer questions, you only demand answers. 

Look, Veghead. I already proved that you are a pedo. That's enough for me.

Rule, idiot. 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:45 am

Holy ****. You are R.Suave. You don't answer questions, you only demand answers. 

Look, Veghead. I already proved that you are a pedo. That's enough for me.

Rule, idiot.

I said I will answer, but you answer me first.  Deal?

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:44 am

I proved it?  lol

Another question to hide behind. Veghead, you can't pull off soks. You can't help hiding behind incessant questions/demands. 

It's impossible for you. 

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:46 am

I said I will answer, but you answer me first.  Deal?

No. I already got my answer. Now **** off Veghead. 

Rule, idiot. 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:47 am

No. I already got my answer. Now **** off Veghead. 

Rule, idiot.

Another one falls by the wayside.  Stay outa law school.  

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:48 am

Another one falls by the wayside.  Stay outa law school.

Pedo^^^
 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:47 am

No. I already got my answer. Now **** off Veghead. 

Rule, idiot.

Does your rule apply to you?

R.Suave » 24 Feb 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:49 am

Does your rule apply to you?

Mr Redundancy strikes again ^^^

4 idiot.

Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.

1. Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples). 
2. "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful. 
3. Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 
4. "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
5. Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
6. Projection
7. "Post your thoughts": My OPs idiot or "it's your thread, your job."
8. "You are lying"  = You are lying by saying I am lying.
9. Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die. 
10. Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
11. Revisiting the same **** over and over: 60k greenies or STFU
12.   "prove you are not a moron": You first. No thoughts of your own. See your OPs for proof.
13. ↓
    ↓
    ↓
    ↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk

 

ActionJackson » 24 Feb 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:44 am

I proved it?  lol

Good luck.

Even @Vegas  can't deny that @Vegas  is a moron.

Ask him to, watch him evade.

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:51 am

Mr Redundancy strikes again ^^^

4 idiot.

Coward.

Narcissist.

R.Suave » 24 Feb 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:52 am

Coward.

Narcissist.

6. 

Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.

1. Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples). 
2. "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful. 
3. Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 
4. "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
5. Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
6. Projection
7. "Post your thoughts": My OPs idiot or "it's your thread, your job."
8. "You are lying"  = You are lying by saying I am lying.
9. Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die. 
10. Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
11. Revisiting the same **** over and over: 60k greenies or STFU
12.   "prove you are not a moron": You first. No thoughts of your own. See your OPs for proof.
13. ↓
    ↓
    ↓
    ↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk

 

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:55 am

6.

Cut&paste....no thoughts.

Vegas » 24 Feb 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 9:49 am

Pedo^^^

I back tracked one of the sok accounts that was **** reddies all over the forum several days ago and and guess who I found at the other end of it?

ActionJackson.

Now it's seeming more and more that AJ and Rico are connected at the hip as well... which means they are either one in the same, or at least know each other away from this forum.

I think they are gay lovers myself... but I'm not judging. If that works for them then by all means, have at it. They are adults after all.

I just think it's pretty ****' hilarious is all.