Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:30 am

Then post your case....

 

I'm good.  The politico article I posted says enough.  I told you, I am not playing your games anymore.  

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:37 am

I'm good.  The politico article I posted says enough.  I told you, I am not playing your games anymore.

 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 8:39 am

Google "Battle of Sevastopol"

Russians remember.

Its why they kicking the **** out of

the NATO LGBTQ community in Ukraine!    
 

Sumela » 15 Feb 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:50 am

Its why they kicking the **** out of

the NATO LGBTQ community in Ukraine!  

they're really tearin' across the place...

A model military campaign.

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 7:40 am

The Russian leader also expressed disappointment around his recent interview with far-right media figure Tucker Carlson.
 “I honestly thought he would be aggressive and ask tough questions. I wasn’t only ready for that, I wanted that, because it would give me the opportunity to give tough answers back,” Putin said.

 “To be frank, I didn’t fully enjoy that interview,” he said.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/europe/p ... index.html

That's Stone Cold...

Tuckie sells his soul, obsequiously tongue bathes Pootie's taint and let's the Commie splooge into his beady eyes.....only to have Pootie walk away disappointed.

Like the time he blew off this mincing nancy in Moscow


 
Pootie must not favor "femmes or fats"..

CNN:     
TDS:     

Media comment proved, again. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:37 am

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:30 am

Then post your case....


 

I'm good.  The politico article I posted says enough.  I told you, I am not playing your games anymore.  

 

It's not "my" game, it's yours.

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:20 am

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:59 am

Heller "established" an individual right to carry.....on the same kinds of specious grounds as Bruen.


 

Take a stand and answer this question so I understand your point.  Are you saying that Heller allows anyone to carry a firearm outside the home with no state regulation involved?

A simple is yes or no answer is all that is required.  

 

I am saying that "Heller established an individual right to carry".....it's all in English...it doesn't need re-phrasing or elaboration.

Vegas » 15 Feb 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:14 am

CNN:     
TDS:     

Media comment proved, again.

Thought.....Unfounded assertion.

Cretin.
 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:23 am

It's not "my" game, it's yours.

I am saying that "Heller established an individual right to carry".....it's all in English...it doesn't need re-phrasing or elaboration.

Which states can still regulate.  What Heller did was this:Writing for the majority in the 5-4 decision, Justice Antonin Scalia, now deceased, said that the Second Amendment "protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."Referring to the so-called militia clause, Scalia added that it "announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope" of individual ownership.

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/14/11137055 ... 0ownership.

ANd the recent NY case decided this:

And a line can be traced from the Supreme Court's 2008 Heller decision to the high court's recent ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen. That 6-3 decision reinforced the previous stance in Heller, holding that a New York state law that required a person to "demonstrate a special need for self-protection" in order to carry a gun outside the home was unconstitutional. The majority opinion said that the law violated the 14th Amendment by "preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public."

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/14/11137055 ... public.%22

Heller gave you the right to own firearm but not the right to carry unrestricted in public. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:37 am

I'm good.  The politico article I posted says enough.  I told you, I am not playing your games anymore.  

You protect your reality until dead or extinction? That is the game he is playing to keep everyone loyal to their system of denying now is eternity.

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:24 am

Thought.....Unfounded assertion.

Cretin.

You are admitting that CNN printed an unfounded assertion? 

Well done. You are starting to see the light. 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:52 am

they're really tearin' across the place...

A model military campaign.

You got that right....well said.

80,000 sq miles of NEW RUSSIA, 4 million NEW RUSSIANS   
 

   Pooties fan boys are bitches.
 Just look at the ones here.
 

Squatchman » 17 Feb 2024, 4:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 4:25 am

   Pooties fan boys are bitches.
 Just look at the ones here.

Bunch of bitches. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Feb 2024, 4:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 4:26 am

Bunch of bitches.

  Yep.
They fill the role handsomely.
 

Bishes?   You mean Dishes?   Sorry if I missed the joke.      
 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 7:40 am

The Russian leader also expressed disappointment around his recent interview with far-right media figure Tucker Carlson.
 “I honestly thought he would be aggressive and ask tough questions. I wasn’t only ready for that, I wanted that, because it would give me the opportunity to give tough answers back,” Putin said.

 “To be frank, I didn’t fully enjoy that interview,” he said.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/europe/p ... index.html

That's Stone Cold...

Tuckie sells his soul, obsequiously tongue bathes Pootie's taint and let's the Commie splooge into his beady eyes.....only to have Pootie walk away disappointed.

Like the time he blew off this mincing nancy in Moscow


 
Pootie must not favor "femmes or fats"..

Hey Dickhead # 1


This is confusing...you, Dickhead #1, and Sumela, Dickhead #2 are each on different sides of the propaganda war....is that allowed in the Guide to Dickheadism's Rules and Other Dickhead ****?

Squatchman » 17 Feb 2024, 4:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 4:25 am

   Pooties fan boys are bitches.
 Just look at the ones here.
 

Stooges, not bitches. Protectors of reasonable doubt, not defenders of self evident results being one themselves.