Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:07 am

This is so brutal in its honesty and thorough in its evisceration of the absolute sham at the heart of Bruen, and Heller, that I'm gonna have make the Hysterians eat the whole thing...

Hawaii Rightly Rejects Supreme Court’s Gun Nonsense 

In a scathing takedown, the state's highest court declared “there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public.”

HIT IT TOM!


 

No thoughts, etc....Copy/paste

 

Vegas » 15 Feb 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:13 am

No thoughts, etc....Copy/paste

 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:11 am

A) You'll soon forget you asked.

B) You won't stand behind it.....

 

I am standing behind the fact that only 27 states have permitless/constitutional carry.  

I already posted the proof.  

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am

 

    Reposting the same debunked ****, just as I predicted. 100% accuracy. 

Difference between notifications and stalking through profiles. Figure it out. 

 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:59 am

Heller "established" an individual right to carry.....on the same kinds of specious grounds as Bruen.

 

Take a stand and answer this question so I understand your point.  Are you saying that Heller allows anyone to carry a firearm outside the home with no state regulation involved?

A simple is yes or no answer is all that is required.  

Vegas » 15 Feb 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:18 am

    Reposting the same debunked ****, just as I predicted. 100% accuracy. 

Difference between notifications and stalking through profiles. Figure it out.

How do you debunk your stupidity?

It's right there, in front of your face.

Don't you read your own wor...


Wait....you don't.... no one does...


This is awkward.
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am

I am standing behind the fact that only 27 states have permitless/constitutional carry.  

I already posted the proof.

and?
 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:28 am

and?
 

 

Here is a little more:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... at%20right.

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:31 am

Here is a little more:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... at%20right.

I'm looking for relevance.

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:27 am

How do you debunk your stupidity?

It's right there, in front of your face.

Don't you read your own wor...

Wait....you don't.... no one does...

This is awkward.

You are conflating notifications with creeping around inside profiles. They are not the same. That's why our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 

We respond to each other's notifications. However, you literally go poking around in people's profile for God only know how long, digging up posts from years ago. 

I don't do that. Never will. 




Watch this accuracy:
1. You didn't read all of it. 

• Prediction within a prediction: you will post the first pic of you admitting that you lied about, per the deal. 

2. Strikethrough
 
 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:59 am

Heller "established" an individual right to carry.....on the same kinds of specious grounds as Bruen.


 

That’s the relevance.  That is not what heller did. No new right was created by heller.  It separated the military from the right bear arms.

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:40 am

That’s the relevance.  That is not what heller did. No new right was created by heller.  It separated the military from the right bear arms.

It separated the military from the right bear arms.

This will go down as another Badge of Honor..


Link?

Vegas » 15 Feb 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:35 am

You are conflating notifications with creeping around inside profiles. They are not the same. That's why our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 

We respond to each other's notifications. However, you literally go poking around in people's profile for God only know how long, digging up posts from years ago. 

I don't do that. Never will. 

Watch this accuracy:
1. You didn't read all of it. 

• Prediction within a prediction: you will post the first pic of you admitting that you lied about, per the deal. 

2. Strikethrough

No...I'm not...

I'm posting unambiguous evidence that you're a moron.
 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:46 am

This will go down as another Badge of Honor..


Link?

 

Ya see, I give you the info so you can make an informed post and  you refuse to read them.  From a previously posted link:

 “an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self defense within the home.”3 Scalia reached this result after undertaking a lengthy survey of historical documents in an attempt to identify the “original” meaning of the Second Amendment.8 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... mendment.8

That is from the  link I posted.  You are right, you have earned yourself another Badge of Honor.

You need to stop reading opinion pieces on this stuff.  So, it did not establish a new right to carry, or any new right whatsoever.  
 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:48 am

No...I'm not...


 

Yes...you are. 

You posted unambiguous proof that you can't display any level of thinking past level 1. 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:14 am

Don't sweat it, Heller gets its *** raped too..

Except when it DOESN'T ****!!!


This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
 
YOU LOSE!!!

Vegas » 15 Feb 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:52 am

Yes...you are. 

You posted unambiguous proof that you can't display any level of thinking past level 1. 

 

He will probably focus on you now because not only did I smash to pieces his argument I destroyed his arguments about Heller. 

R.Suave » 15 Feb 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 9:10 am

Blue states are not generally known for attacking the federal government or running rogue programs in defiance of federal law. After all, that’s the business of Texas. But as six Republicans on the US Supreme Court increasingly arrogate to their bloc the power to make national law, frustration in blue states is mounting. Last week in Hawaii, it flowed like lava from an angry volcano.

 Just one day before a sympathetic Supreme Court heard the [url=chrome-extension://bdfcnmeidppjeaggnmidamkiddifkdib/viewer.html?file=https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_argum ... 9_feah.pdf]case[/url] of an insurrectionist who wants to be president, the highest state court in Hawaii declared that it really, truly, is sick and tired of the Supreme Court’s nonsense. In a unanimous decision handed down Feb. 7, the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that it has no obligation to treat the high court in the nation’s capital with deference; it couldn’t even summon basic respect. The state court reached that end point, fittingly, in a case concerning what it derisively called “the Second Amendment’s brand-new right to bear arms in public for self-defense.”

ibid.

Ouch!

"brand new"?

Will someone pick Free Ride up off the floor....

Thanks to the spread of Gangsta Rap *** Worship via MTV and other media and thanks to the spread of *** into Rural America via Section Ape Housing Programs .....
we are seeing and will continue to see their Sub Human "Ize gunna bussacap inyo azz" behavior pollute and infect the minds of the gangsta wannabee  WIGGERS, CHIGGERS [Chink Boyz] and SPIGGERS [Spics and Injuns] in rural USA.

This has been a deliberately engineered and society debasing "social program" of the [[[Jew World Order]]].
This **** didn't "just happen"....  
Outlawing self defense with a firearm has always been high on their list of Global Agenda and getting the increasingly helpless and effeminate US public [people like Black Vegetable] eager to surrender it's basic human right to self defense with a fire arm is their final obstacle.
My God...we even have effeminately raised twerps like Black Vegetable dialing 911 nowadays when they have a flat tire or a dead battery....  
No way are people like this physically or emotionally equipped to clean and gut a fish, let alone defend themselves with a firearm.....  

 
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:52 am

Ya see, I give you the info so you can make an informed post and  you refuse to read them.  From a previously posted link:

 “an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self defense within the home.”3 Scalia reached this result after undertaking a lengthy survey of historical documents in an attempt to identify the “original” meaning of the Second Amendment.8 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... mendment.8

That is from the  link I posted.  You are right, you have earned yourself another Badge of Honor.

You need to stop reading opinion pieces on this stuff.  So, it did not establish a new right to carry, or any new right whatsoever.

You need to learn to read.

Heller had nothing to do with the "military"....SCOTUS can't "separate" the Military from anything.

Scalia created an individual constitutional right to "bear" irrespective of the MILITIA language in the 2nd Amendment.....on entirely specious historical AND grammatical grounds.

 

 

Vegas » 15 Feb 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2024, 10:52 am

Yes...you are. 

You posted unambiguous proof that you can't display any level of thinking past level 1.

That's proof you can't REACH Level 1.