Everyone playing the odds call me odd for evening out reasonable doubt with natural timing of genetic outcomes adapting as displaced.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Where are the ads? :)
Are you talking about GOOGLEADS?
They don't pay ****.
No kidding, dunce.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Where are the ads?
Are you talking about GOOGLEADS?
They don't pay ****.
So you have and you haven't.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Exchanging posts and just reading are two entirely different things.
Yeah, like with your mother.
Oh, a mother joke. You showed me!
You think an ad hom ducks the question?
I talked to everybody at least a couple times.
Ohm has been around a **** of a lot longer than A.I, has been around - but this dude is stuck on stupid and has no reverse gear.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I talked to everybody at least a couple times.
As far as ohm, probably the same. He's been a fixture on this and the OLF since I've been here. Of course I talked to him.
That doesn't mean that 99.2% of the time I just scroll on by, like everybody else.
Good enough?
**** you lying bitch. Prove something you goddamned liar!
Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Ohm has been around a **** of a lot longer than A.I, has been around -
Honestly, if ohm were actually AI, then someone needs to update that program because the guy has sounded exactly the same for the last 5 years.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Ohm has been around a **** of a lot longer than A.I, has been around - but this dude is stuck on stupid and has no reverse gear.
I think you're full of ****.frank » 22 Feb 2024, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
Contemporary AI has been around for decades. The concept has been around for centuries. AI is recently in the news because companies like google are promoting it. A marketing campaign doesn't make it new.
The last 15, actually. He was posting in 2009, to my knowledge.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Honestly, if ohm were actually AI, then someone need to update that program because the guy has sounded exactly the same for the last 5 years.
Right. Sentence scramblers were only developed six months ago.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I think you're full of ****.
Demonstrate that this ohm character could have been an AI generated bot when I first encountered him in 2009.
He is full of ****.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I think you're full of ****.
Demonstrate that this ohm character could have been an AI generated bot when I first encountered him in 2009.
RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Honestly, if ohm were actually AI, then someone needs to update that program because the guy has sounded exactly the same for the last 5 years.
RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I talked to everybody at least a couple times.
As far as ohm, probably the same. He's been a fixture on this and the OLF since I've been here. Of course I talked to him.
That doesn't mean that 99.2% of the time I just scroll on by, like everybody else.
Good enough?
Sure... all three of us.frank » 22 Feb 2024, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
The account doesn't need to change. Imbeciles keep talking to it.