Liberal Forum

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 9:58 am

Prove it and name the victim.  Plus, this is a new law.  Trump is the first to be sued with it.

Do you know anything about financing real estate development?

What the capital stack looks like, or even what a capital stack is?

The bank provided the debt, under false pretenses - where did Grifty find the 30-40% equity he had to put up?


 

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:01 am

Do you know anything about financing real estate development?

What the capital stack looks like, or even what a capital stack is?

The bank provided the debt, under false pretenses - where did Grifty find the 30-40% equity he had to put up?

You are asking questions?  Seriously?  Prove me wrong.

The bank never complained.  The bank made millions and got their money back.  

I am not like you.  I don't pretend to know every thing about everything.  So I listen to those I trust.  And to the point you have posted nothing to disprove what Have found out.

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 9:59 am

Argue with Kevin.  Let's see, he is an investor with a $400 million dollar net worth.  You are an old, lonely guy living in what you claim is a $500,000 shared wall duplex that you claim is 3200 sq ft and 5 floors.  

Who wold you believe?

He's lying, on FOX, for face time.

You are an old, lonely guy living in what you claim is a $500,000

10 am est...the melt down begins.

You're off by 20%.

It's not what I claim. A smaller, less private unit sold for more than what you wish you could get for your cookie cutter.
in less than 1 open house.

I've also spent 15 years vetting real estate proposals. I understand the process and the accounting.

You watch FOX.


 

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:04 am

You are asking questions?  Seriously?  Prove me wrong.

The bank never complained.  The bank made millions and got their money back.  

I am not like you.  I don't pretend to know every thing about everything.  So I listen to those I trust.  And to the point you have posted nothing to disprove what Have found out.

As I say...everything you know, you were told to believe by FOX - a network which fires people for telling the truth, and paid 787 million for lying.

I hold a charter in Alternative Investment Analysis.

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:06 am

He's lying, on FOX, for face time.

10 am est...the melt down begins.

You're off by 20%.

It's not what I claim. A smaller, less private unit sold for more than what you wish you could get for your cookie cutter.
in less than 1 open house.

I've also spent 15 years vetting real estate proposals. I understand the process and the accounting.

You watch FOX.

I'm fie.  

I saw the pic of your duplex.  What a ****.

And I can tell your meltdown is well under way because you are not comprehending what I post.  The interview I posted is from CNN, *******.  

There was no victim, no fraud, and everyone got their money.
 

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:08 am

As I say...everything you know, you were told to believe by FOX - a network which fires people for telling the truth, and paid 787 million for lying.

I hold a charter in Alternative Investment Analysis.

Dum Dum, the video I posted was from CNN.  I have told you that three times.

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2024, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2024, 7:34 pm

This guy had a rough day, and then this happened"

https://i.postimg.cc/2my1zPqM/image.png

Did hunter party with him?   I’d like to see him going at it with plugs daughter 

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:12 am

I'm fie.  

I saw the pic of your duplex.  What a ****.

And I can tell your meltdown is well under way because you are not comprehending what I post.  The interview I posted is from CNN, *******.  

There was no victim, no fraud, and everyone got their money.

Dollars talk....your opinion doesn't.

There was no victim,

Only because the look back was limited to 10 years. And it is not a necessary condition.

no fraud,

Signing false attestations for the purpose of accessing credit is fraud.

Period.

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:15 am

Dollars talk....your opinion doesn't.

Only because the look back was limited to 10 years. And it is not a necessary condition.

Signing false attestations for the purpose of accessing credit is fraud.

Period.

New law, no victim and every one made millions.  

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:13 am

Dum Dum, the video I posted was from CNN.  I have told you that three times.

Kevin is full of ****.

 

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:17 am

New law, no victim and every one made millions.

There was fraud.

Only the 10 year limit spares us a list of victims.

You can retire your talking points now.
 

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 9:59 am

Argue with Kevin.  Let's see, he is an investor with a $400 million dollar net worth.  You are an old, lonely guy living in what you claim is a $500,000 shared wall duplex that you claim is 3200 sq ft and 5 floors.  

Who wold you believe?

People like him won't acknowledge a person like me. I know just by posting on message boards like this, and personal experience compromising with humanity every rotation of the planet I am not allowed to discuss actual evolving, or face constant ridicule, shunning by friends and family for not supporting their dreams of tomorrow, exiled from group activities not being loyal to the we mantra.

being surrounded by people that won't accept evolving for all it does in real time I still don't feel alone, because I hear the grief and regret ancestors have forced to comply with reasonable doubt and keep self evident secrets to extinction by God's words, society's promises of better tomorrows, and tyranny executing persons for being honest about humanity's greater good intentions.

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:15 am

Dollars talk....your opinion doesn't.

Only because the look back was limited to 10 years. And it is not a necessary condition.

Signing false attestations for the purpose of accessing credit is fraud.

Period.

  They seem to think there needs to be a victim for there to be a crime.
They're in full flail mode now.

 
 

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:17 am

Kevin is full of ****.

Prove it.
 
 

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:18 am

There was fraud.

Only the 10 year limit spares us a list of victims.

You can retire your talking points now.

LMAO!

 

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:19 am

Prove it.

What proof did Kev offer?

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:20 am

LMAO!

Describe how Grifty collected the 40% he had to put up as equity in the development of the tower in Chicago...

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:20 am

What proof did Kev offer?

The burden is for you to prove he is lying.  Not to ask questions.  You have no clue what you are talking about.

R.Suave » 17 Feb 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:22 am

Describe how Grifty collected the 40% he had to put up as equity in the development of the tower in Chicago...

Post the victims and who did not only get their money back and did not make millions.

Huey » 17 Feb 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2024, 10:23 am

The burden is for you to prove he is lying.  Not to ask questions.  You have no clue what you are talking about.

No, it isn't.

All I have to do is assert to the contrary.