What's the difference betwee n notifications vs stalking inside member's profiles?
Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.
- Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples).
- "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful.
- Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam.
- "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
- Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
- Projection
- "You are lying" = You are lying by saying I am lying.
- Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die.
- Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
- Revisiting the same **** over and over: 60k greenies or STFU
Why don’t you answer one asked before yours, ANTIFA EGGPLANT ***?
Vegas » 20 Feb 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ What's the difference betwee n notifications vs stalking inside member's profiles?
This pic is not stalking. You stalk. Period.
3
Anyone who has self-awareness toward social norms knows that is psychotic. Public info or not.
Stalking, in the belief that you have a mandate to "punish", is even more pathological than insisting that your rules don't apply to you.Vegas » 20 Feb 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Anyone who has self-awareness toward social norms knows that is psychotic. Public info or not.
And as always. The same **** conversation: You first. You have no thoughts of your own, thus you are a moron.
It looks like I will need to add that onto y0our cheat sheet now also.
**** your excuses. Stalkers always rationalize their psychotic behavior.R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ Stalking, in the belief that you have a mandate to "punish", is even more pathological than insisting that your rules don't apply to you.
And then he gets mad as hell when someone hands it right back to him.Vegas » 20 Feb 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Responds to a question with a question.
Your cowardice never ends.
Vegas » 20 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ **** your excuses. Stalkers always rationalize their psychotic behavior.
You are a stalker. POS.

A few posts ago, I explained his 4 step evasion process. It's what narcissists do incessantly.RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ And then he gets mad as hell when someone hands it right back to him.
It's hilarious
We literally just went over this. Your memory is ****. Stalker boy.
You prattled a bunch of crap.Vegas » 20 Feb 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ We literally just went over this. Your memory is ****. Stalker boy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk
Bitterness is your muse..RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ And then he gets mad as hell when someone hands it right back to him.
It's hilarious
R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ You prattled a bunch of crap.
I post evidence.
You can't debunk your own stupid.
What am I supposed to be "bitter" about Rico?
Why ask me?
Your fee-fees are noted.Vegas » 20 Feb 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Yu have yet to post thoughts of your own. Not ever.
Your posts are a stone throw away from plagiarism. Your media is your master.
Here comes Mary.
Prove it.
You're the one claiming I'm bitter about something...
It's quite obvious.RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ You're the one claiming I'm bitter about something...
I guess you're pleading the 5th... again.
And you still haven't figured out why everyone treats you the way they do huh?R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ It's quite obvious.
The signal to noise ratio.
It's a pattern of behavior with which I've become familiar.