Ever find those links?R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ . This means that roughly 11 million of the 13.2 million-job increase on Biden’s watch are simply "workers returning from pandemic layoffs" rather than jobs actually created, the campaign said."
No linksZeets2 » 20 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure you do! Anything to stall your partisan hero's failures while you stupidly try to give Biden the benefits of the great Trump economy he ruined!
Can you follow it now, dickhead?
Here's another tidbit that should have Democrats ready to blow their heads off in the coming campaign:
Get it now, stupid?
NOT ONLY were the paltry number of new jobs Biden can take credit for mostly part-time and new government hires, but those new unskilled jobs were taken NOT BY AMERICANS, but by the illegal immigrants Biden has flooded the country with!
And assholes like you were too dumb to figure out how that stupidity would leave blacks and other minorities stepped over by Biden's illegals, BUT IT WILL KEEP WAGES LOW FOR THEM FOR YEARS TO COME!
Yes, you sure did a great job for your race by electing Biden, didn't you?![]()
![]()
@Zeets doesn't believe in them.
You make this claims about Trump but never show any proof
Looks like it.BooRadley » 20 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You make this claims about Trump but never show any proof
R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ More jobs, more economic growth, less hysteria.
Sounds awful.

$1,000,000,000,000 CC debt...BooRadley » 20 Feb 2024, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Tell us..
If wages are up why...
Can't people afford a house..
Automobile reposessions up...
Forecloseures up....
Gas prices up but we're producing more energy?
but it is "Mexican food" which apparently is "up"...RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ What are the jobs and how much do they pay.
An extra helping of beans and rice isn't the same as having a ribeye ya know.
R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Surprise: Wage growth has actually outpaced the crushing inflation over the past 2.5 years. ‘The economy appears to be doing better than a lot of people might realize’
https://fortune.com/2023/12/12/wage-gro ... democrats/
wow...$20 a week...Majik » 20 Feb 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ Only you would celebrate ....chump change....
From your link....
"The median inflation-adjusted change in workers’ hourly earnings was about 45 cents, which translates to a more than $900 annual increase for a worker who works full time, year-round."

"they don't realize..."BooRadley » 20 Feb 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's put it this way...
You think things are going great....
Why is he polling so low?
Because Jesse's math is mo' betta'?ROG62 » 20 Feb 2024, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
ya, the real reason why they aren't "realizing" it because it isn't....stupid ****...
A report by the Center for Immigration StudiesZeets2 » 20 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure you do! Anything to stall your partisan hero's failures while you stupidly try to give Biden the benefits of the great Trump economy he ruined!
Can you follow it now, dickhead?
Here's another tidbit that should have Democrats ready to blow their heads off in the coming campaign:
Get it now, stupid?
NOT ONLY were the paltry number of new jobs Biden can take credit for mostly part-time and new government hires, but those new unskilled jobs were taken NOT BY AMERICANS, but by the illegal immigrants Biden has flooded the country with!
And assholes like you were too dumb to figure out how that stupidity would leave blacks and other minorities stepped over by Biden's illegals, BUT IT WILL KEEP WAGES LOW FOR THEM FOR YEARS TO COME!
Yes, you sure did a great job for your race by electing Biden, didn't you?![]()
![]()
DAMN, but you're stupid!
Yea, ****.Zeets2 » 20 Feb 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ DAMN, but you're stupid!
You want a link, moron?
Are you too **** lazy and ignorant to simply copy and paste the name and date of the story in order to find it on Google in about 2 seconds?
Or is it just that you can't stand the thought of having no response after you demanded I post the sources I gave you, so you need to avoid seeing the facts you demanded that kick your liberal dumb *** all over the boards?
And if you don't like my sources, the solution is simple, dickhead!
GO GET YOUR OWN, AND THEY'LL TELL YOU THE SAME DAMN THING!
OR, get yourself a source that contradicts what they state so you have something to respond with other than some weak emoji!
But of course, integrity and the detailed information they refuse to give you on CNN and MSNBC aren't useful requirements for blind and stupid liberals, are they?
When Suave starts striking through your replies, then you have won the argument.Zeets2 » 20 Feb 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ DAMN, but you're stupid!
You want a link, moron?
Are you too **** lazy and ignorant to simply copy and paste the name and date of the story in order to find it on Google in about 2 seconds?
Or is it just that you can't stand the thought of having no response after you demanded I post the sources I gave you, so you need to avoid seeing the facts you demanded that kick your liberal dumb *** all over the boards?
And if you don't like my sources, the solution is simple, dickhead!
GO GET YOUR OWN, AND THEY'LL TELL YOU THE SAME DAMN THING!
OR, get yourself a source that contradicts what they state so you have something to respond with other than some weak emoji!
But of course, integrity and the detailed information they refuse to give you on CNN and MSNBC aren't useful requirements for blind and stupid liberals, are they?
Why, because a dope like you says so?
No...because that's how it works...Zeets2 » 20 Feb 2024, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Why, because a dope like you says so?
Why don't you just admit you're too dumb to know that's all you have to do to get the story you're looking for?
If you truly wanted to educate your stupid self and learn the truth, it wouldn't be a big deal to copy the title and date and Google it!
But you don't want to learn the truth, because you know it always proves what a demented jackass you support!
Lets try to find it out, OK?
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO DIDN'T KNOW THEY COULD GOOGLE SEARCH A STORY WITH SIMPLY THE TITLE AND DATE?
Or is Eggplant simply the biggest imbecile here?