So, where is our buffer between us and Mexico... or even Canada for that matter.DeezerShoove » 22 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Right. And even then, it's not "conquering a country" type stuff.
Russia, even before USSR, needed a set of buffer states as much as any country.
They are bordered by not-so-friendlies on all sides. Who could blame them for being protective?
China may be a current non-aggression pact type now, but why would Russians trust that ****?
Their not-so-distance past proves that type of agreement to be quite temporary.
At face value, Russia invaded a country. Yes.
But anyone that leaves it at that isn't looking beneath the veneer.
I accept your concession...Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ It gets hard, unlike that flaccid Biden appendage you're desperately plunging for pre-cum.
Until there IS a war, it does.
I concede that you are all up on Biden's cock. Glad you accept my concession, fruitcake.
^^^^^^Raging again - signs of a LOW IQ NEOCONRedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ So, where is our buffer between us and Mexico... or even Canada for that matter.
We shouldn't trust either one of them sumbitches!
We should invade. It's only the proper thing to do in the name of sovereignty!

I think I upset your boyfriend.
Dude, '''vaneer''' is ALL 90% here on NHB give a **** about....DeezerShoove » 22 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Right. And even then, it's not "conquering a country" type stuff.
Russia, even before USSR, needed a set of buffer states as much as any country.
They are bordered by not-so-friendlies on all sides. Who could blame them for being protective?
China may be a current non-aggression pact type now, but why would Russians trust that ****?
Their not-so-distance past proves that type of agreement to be quite temporary.
At face value, Russia invaded a country. Yes.
But anyone that leaves it at that isn't looking beneath the veneer.
RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ So, where is our buffer between us and Mexico... or even Canada for that matter.
We shouldn't trust either one of them sumbitches.
We should invade. It's only the proper thing to do in the name of sovereignty.
He accepted your concession.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I think I upset your boyfriend.
You can thank me later...
Sumela » 22 Feb 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude, '''vaneer''' is ALL 90% here on NHB give a **** about....
the myths, clichés, jingoism, naivete, exceptionalism, blah blah
Your own link says she is a Russian citizen.
The OP's link says she is a Russian citizen.RedheadedStranger » 21 Feb 2024, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe the USA will start arresting Russian citizens in this Country that support Russia.
That would be Glorious
The OP's link says she is a Russian citizen.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ The ballerina that your hero Ruskies are threatening with reason is an American citizen from L.A. you twit.
We are not at war with russia.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ So arrest the dual citizens here that support Russia.
Hell... just pick one, and make an example out of them.
She has duel citizenship and had been living in L.A.HillaryClinton » 22 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The OP's link says she is a Russian citizen.
Were you sun-downing when you blathered this scat?
Right. She is a Russian Citizen, just like I said.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ She has duel citizenship and had been living in L.A.
So the U.S. citizen part of the equation just flew right over your little pea brain huh?HillaryClinton » 22 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Right. She is a Russian Citizen, just like I said.
Thank you for acknowledging that you finally get it.
Now, if you can stop posting as if you DON'T get it, that would be great.
I didn't get hung up about it like you did. I saw it for its proper level of relevance to Russian law, which is zero.RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ So the U.S. citizen part of the equation just flew right over your little pea brain huh?
I'm not surprised.
Those cheesy piss-flaps of your's can't be improving with age.HillaryClinton » 22 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ We are not at war with russia.
Were you sun-downing when you blathered this scat?
You just want to see her hang because she dared to support Ukraine.HillaryClinton » 22 Feb 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't get hung up about it like you did. I saw it for its proper level of relevance to Russian law, which is zero.
She isn't being charged as an American citizen. She is being charged as a Russian citizen. That you have a problem understanding that has absolutely nothing to do with me. That is ALL you.
And since we're clearing the air, let's hip you to another fact to which you appear oblivious. She did a wee bit more than donate 51 dollars to the enemy of the country of which she is a citizen.
Perhaps treason is old hat to a fellow committed neocon war pig, but governments actually take it pretty seriously.
Here is a thought: Your side could pretend she is a trans athlete, and trade a high value prisoner for her while leaving patriots in the gulag. It's what you do, after all.