Okay pasta...
Do you believe your opinion of Mattis, by way of @Huey 's random googling, is of any consequence?Tempest62 » 21 Feb 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Well Suave, your OP went over like a lead zeppelin
We don’t GAFF about your loser tool Mattis
No and I couldn’t care less.R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you believe your opinion of Mattis, by way of @Huey 's random googling, is of any consequence?
Hi lil man!R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you believe your opinion of Mattis, by way of @Huey 's random googling, is of any consequence?
Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny feet, how's that post count doing? I saw your son come close to one of your daily posting records. He had 217 one day recently.

How many times I have to tell you that since the purge those two sections are inaccurate.
Tiny,Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ How many times I have to tell you that since the purge those two sections are inaccurate.
For context.
Tiny,Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ For context.
Did I also mention that I have been a member of this forum since it began, 12 or 13 years ago. You? You joined just under 7 years ago as blackvegetabel and came back in November with a new screen name. As blackvegetable you had all over 150,000 posts, a number I wasn't even close too. I wasn't in 6 digits. You accomplished that in under 6 years.
Since the purge and crash I have 15,536 post prior to this one. You? Since Nov 21 23, you have 8,297. That is slightly more than 1/2 of what I have. You have no I've outside of this forum.
No, it is your daily post count, considering you have been here less than half time I have. And you a lot more posts. Justify it all you like. You have no life.
Your output is in substantial surplus..Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ No, it is your daily post count, considering you have been here less than half time I have. And you a lot more posts. Justify it all you like. You have no life.
Nah, I have been here almost twice as long as you. Your body of work is less than 7 years in the making. You won’t find me with 800 plus posts in a week.
Your output grossly exceeds the indicated demand for it.Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Nah, I have been here almost twice as long as you. Your body of work is less than 7 years in the making. You won’t find me with 800 plus posts in a week.
You can’t get at Lund your post count in such a limited time.
Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Nah, I have been here almost twice as long as you. Your body of work is less than 7 years in the making. You won’t find me with 800 plus posts in a week.
You can’t get at Lund your post count in such a limited time.
keep it focused...You can’t get at Lund your post count in such a limited time.
What does evolving give each lifetime every other reproduction receives since conceived occupying space, equally here? The time they maintain adapting as displaced.Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ I am focused. Less than 7 years and two screen names and you are pushing 200,000 posts. And in typical IcebergSlim/Blackvegetable/Retardo Smarmy fashion you blame everyone else instead of taking personal responsibility for what you do.
That is 28,500 posts a year.
That is an avg of 79 posts a day. But we now you frequently post 150 plus a day.
have no life.
Stating facts isn't "blaming" anyone, Tiny.Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ I am focused. Less than 7 years and two screen names and you are pushing 200,000 posts. And in typical IcebergSlim/Blackvegetable/Retardo Smarmy fashion you blame everyone else instead of taking personal responsibility for what you do.
That is 28,500 posts a year.
That is an avg of 79 posts a day. But we now you frequently post 150 plus a day.
have no life.