Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Feb 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:06 am

I figured the photo was his way of taking a "parting shot" and implying that I my last comment to him was "gay".
Now get this.
When he finally worked up the nerve to tell us the photo was of Trump and that the photo was legit because it belonged to Vanity Fair...DID I DEMAND THAT HE PROVIDE PROOF THAT HIS CLAIM WAS TRUE [like a little ****** Bitch]...?
Of course not.
Men don't act that way.
If a man sees something that he thinks is untrue he takes the initiative to debunk the claim himself.
So I did a Google Image search and discovered that it was registered with Getty Images and was listed by serial number in their catalog.
I looked that number up and discovered that the photo belonged to a different Gay Tabloid and not Vanity Fair.
The Gay Tabloid that displayed the photo was doing an article about Cohn and most certainly would have mentioned Trump was his side kick in that photo...because that's the sort of "gossipy" stuff that their queer subscribers gobble up like flies on ****.   

Sumela » 22 Feb 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 10:56 am

But, Ive never seen him meltdown.   He simply drags you guys wherever he wishes....and yall follow.  Have fun with it.
 

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:14 am

And this is why the Holocaust is now qualified, by references to Oregon and San Francisco.

Nostradamus'omh » 22 Feb 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:16 am

You never offer a complete correction to everything became absolutely corrupted by power of suggesting life isn't self evident genetics actually eternally separates reproductions evolving forward one at a time now.

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:12 am

Have I offered that citation as reason not to loathe Obama?

Huey » 22 Feb 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:22 am

Reframey, you can start a thread.

Huey » 22 Feb 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:22 am

Reframey, you can start a thread.

Vegas » 22 Feb 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:01 am

Are we giving them these materials? I know we have been supplying them with weapons and money.

Sumela » 22 Feb 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:19 am

 
 
 
 

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:14 am

And this is why the Holocaust is now qualified, by references to Oregon and San Francisco.

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:24 am

I take that as a "no".

So what does it have to do with @Vegas  being a **** idiot?

Sumela » 22 Feb 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:24 am

He doesnt have to.   You **** follow that retard around on other threads. 

He owns you.  Its hilarious          
 

 

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:24 am

I take that as a "no".

So what does it have to do with @Vegas  being a **** idiot?

Reference sheet for Veghead's advanced stage dementia and incessant redundancies.

1. Media Comment = You can't refute it it (VF caption is one of many examples). 
2. "Are these your words/fee-fees)?" or "**** writes itself" = random quotes strung together for you to pretend they are meaningful. 
3. Two pics: First pic- you admitted that you are lying about it, per the deal. Second pic- our notifications are comparable, minus the spam. 
4. "Does the rule apply to you?" = Yes, but I don't violate it because I answer member's questions. You don't. Thus, you are punished for it.
5. Questions/demands = Rule, idiot. 1k greenies. Or **** your questions/demands.
6. Projection
7. "Post your thoughts": My OPs idiot or "it's your thread, your job."
8. "You are lying"  = You are lying by saying I am lying.
9. Creeping in profiles= **** you stalker. Die. 
10. Strikethroughs = Too much of a coward to read past 3 words...then makes an *** out of himself for it.
11. Revisiting the same **** over and over: 60k greenies or STFU
12.   "prove you are not a moron": You first. No thoughts of your own. See your OPs for proof.
13. ↓
    ↓
    ↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk

Huey » 22 Feb 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:28 am

Looky here Tin Foil Hat Guy, much of the time it is him following us.

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:14 am

And this is why the Holocaust is now qualified, by references to Oregon and San Francisco.

Huey » 22 Feb 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:27 am

What does your diversion have to do with a war, a proxy war, F 16s, etc?  As I posted yesterday when you are getting your *** kicked you wait for someone to say something you can use to divert.  Classic example right here.

RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:32 am

GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Feb 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:27 am

What do your dishonest and failed attempts to define me as a "Holocaust Denier" have to do with anything here.....?
Just running up your glorious Post Count like the way the mechanical bird mindlessly dips it's quill over and over into the glass of water...?

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:33 am

Of course...

Because R. Suave......

You should have led with that...

 

R.Suave » 22 Feb 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2024, 11:34 am

Ask Ghetto.

Coming from anyone else it would sound insane...