You're as lost as last year's Easter eggs jerra...jerrab » 24 Feb 2024, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ oh, how you accuse everyone else running away when you are the champ.
RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ An he always cries like a little bitch when someone does that to him...
Go figure eh?
What do you want me to respond to?jerrab » 24 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ please respond
------------------------------------------------------
https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/presi ... candidates
you choose the criminal.
RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you want me to respond to?
Are you asking a question or what?
What do you think my reply that you just quoted was even about? Do you even know?
You imply I support Trump because I I don't support Bidenjerrab » 24 Feb 2024, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑ you avoid everything.
you implied I support biden because I don't support trump.
thar is illogical.
I then responded that there candidates other than lying cheating trump.
no response from you.
the republician voters are incapable of choosing a non crimial for presidential candidate.RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You imply I support Trump because I I don't support Biden
That's illogical.
See how this works?
Right now, like it or not, it's Trump and Biden going into November. I know that can change, but that's what it is right now.
You can pontificate about some unknown third stringer all day long to try and prove your bi-partisanship, but at the the end of the day you're still a leftist.
The fact that I won't play patty cake with you doesn't mean ****.
Good Lord...
What you fail to realize is, they are all criminals.jerrab » 24 Feb 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ the republician voters are incapable of choosing a non crimial for presidential candidate.
your stupidity, your choice.
RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You imply I support Trump because I I don't support Biden
That's illogical.
See how this works?
Right now, like it or not, it's Trump and Biden going into November. I know that can change, but that's what it is right now.
You can pontificate about some unknown third stringer all day long to try and prove your bi-partisanship, but at the the end of the day you're still a leftist.
The fact that I won't play patty cake with you doesn't mean ****.
Good Lord...
Who will you vote for?jerrab » 24 Feb 2024, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I imply you support trump on the basis you say it everyday.
Just because I laugh at the fact that Trump is upsetting DC's apple cart, doesn't necessarily mean that I "support" the guy.jerrab » 24 Feb 2024, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I imply you support trump on the basis you say it everyday.
The DC apple cart?RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Just because I laugh at the fact that Trump is upsetting DC's apple cart, doesn't necessarily mean that I "support" the guy.
I didn't vote for him in '16 or '20 either one if that tells you anything.
Yeah... the wrench in the machine... the stick in the spokes... turning over the apple cart.
Agreed. I wish somebody would. But Trump filled his cabinet with all Swamp.RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah... the wrench in the machine... the stick in the spokes... turning over the apple cart.
It's a figure of speech meaning to **** up a plan.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/upset--the--applecart
In 2016 he had two things working against him... he didn't know the landscape, and the swamp was about all he had to choose from.Sumela » 24 Feb 2024, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Agreed. I wish somebody would. But Trump filled his cabinet with all Swamp.
His words rarely matched his actions.
So he spent all that time talking about the SWAMP...over and over and over,RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ In 2016 he had two things working against him... he didn't know the landscape, and the swamp was about all he had to choose from.
This time, if he somehow manages to pull it off and get back in, I have a feeling it will be very different than the first term.
Several people that were in his cabinet and admin during his first term have stated that they will flee the Country to somewhere that doesn't have an extradition agreement with the U.S. if Trump wins again... one of them being John Bolton.Sumela » 24 Feb 2024, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑ So he spent all that time talking about the SWAMP...over and over and over,
but he didnt know who it was?... AND was not?
Any amateur poli observer knew the SWAMP was:
Pence
Screechy Haley
Bolton
Pompeo
Barr
Haspel
Rosen
Okay. sir.RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 10:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Several people that were in his cabinet and admin during his first term have stated that they will flee the Country to somewhere that doesn't have an extradition agreement with the U.S. if Trump wins again... one of them being John Bolton.
I'm telling ya, a second Trump term will look very different than the first one. Almost scary different.
I don't think they'll ever let him back in there though. I just don't see it happening. I look for him to be killed... most likely by something explainable like a plane crash.
As I watch any two people trade insults in every thread it reminds me of Abbott and Costello who's on first skit. Sure I get into doing trading insults but I also add something, the natural balance point to space life is timed ancestrally apart in by the numbers alive in this atmosphere, now.jerra b » 24 Feb 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ the republician voters are incapable of choosing a non crimial for presidential candidate.
your stupidity, your choice.
RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ What you fail to realize is, they are all criminals.
In this Country, nobody achieves that status without breaking the rules... a lot.
It's honestly why I haven't pulled for a mainstream POTUS candidate since Bill Clinton in 1992.
They're all crooked as ****.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/01/politics ... .htmlTrump and company saved $168 million in loan interest as a result of fraud, banking expert testifies\--------------------------------RedheadedStranger » 22 Feb 2024, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I'm not
You didn't.
You said "Fraud doesn't always require a victim".
That doesn't answer my question... liar.