Liberal Forum

Looks like Fani has some splainin do due for this new information. It explains her conduct during testimony.
​​​​

Read "Cell data contradicts Fani Willis’ testimony, court documents suggest" on SmartNews: https://l.smartnews.com/p-Up7eJ/oyWH0Y

Cellphone data obtained by Trump's legal team shows Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor, visited Willis' neighborhood at least 35 times in the 11 months before Willis hired him in late 2021. Twice, Wade arrived late at night and left early the following morning. The data shows about 2,000 calls and 12,000 text messages between Wade and Willis from January 2021 to November 2021. The data seems to contradict testimony by Wade and Willis about the timeline of their relationship

Fuelman » 23 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm

Looks like Fani has some splainin do due for this new information. It explains her conduct during testimony.
​​​​

Read "Cell data contradicts Fani Willis’ testimony, court documents suggest" on SmartNews: https://l.smartnews.com/p-Up7eJ/oyWH0Y

Cellphone data obtained by Trump's legal team shows Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor, visited Willis' neighborhood at least 35 times in the 11 months before Willis hired him in late 2021. Twice, Wade arrived late at night and left early the following morning. The data shows about 2,000 calls and 12,000 text messages between Wade and Willis from January 2021 to November 2021. The data seems to contradict testimony by Wade and Willis about the timeline of their relationship

You do understand that this has no bearing on the case against Grifty, right?

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm

You do understand that this has no bearing on the case against Grifty, right?

Sure, it just won't be her making any further decisions.
 

EWWWWWWW,

He was *** raping that fat *** whore?  Another *** whore like Kamala.


 

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm

You do understand that this has no bearing on the case against Grifty, right?

You figuring this Judge is in the bag, too?

Sumela » 23 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm

EWWWWWWW,

He was *** raping that fat *** whore?  Another *** whore like Kamala.

   
 

Fuelman » 23 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm

Sure, it just won't be her making any further decisions.

She built the case that convinced two grand juries to indict.

RebelGator » 23 Feb 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:32 pm

You figuring this Judge is in the bag, too?

it's all a conspiracy...

Fuelman » 23 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm

Looks like Fani has some splainin do due for this new information. It explains her conduct during testimony.
​​​​

Read "Cell data contradicts Fani Willis’ testimony, court documents suggest" on SmartNews: https://l.smartnews.com/p-Up7eJ/oyWH0Y

Cellphone data obtained by Trump's legal team shows Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor, visited Willis' neighborhood at least 35 times in the 11 months before Willis hired him in late 2021. Twice, Wade arrived late at night and left early the following morning. The data shows about 2,000 calls and 12,000 text messages between Wade and Willis from January 2021 to November 2021. The data seems to contradict testimony by Wade and Willis about the timeline of their relationship

12,000 text messages?
He slept over?
2000 phone calls?

Yeah..
But they weren't involved?

Yeah right 
 

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm

She built the case that convinced two grand juries to indict.

Let the case continue as far as I'm concerned.

This is about Fani making a career ending move.
 

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm

She built the case that convinced two grand juries to indict.

She appeared to commit perjury..
As he did
 

BooRadley » 23 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm

12,000 text messages?
He slept over?
2000 phone calls?

Yeah..
But they weren't involved?

Yeah right

It could be fake news but the text messages should be very enlightening if they see daylight.
 

BooRadley » 23 Feb 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:51 pm

She appeared to commit perjury..
As he did

Doesn't have any effect on the Grifty case.

BooRadley » 23 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm

12,000 text messages?
He slept over?
2000 phone calls?

Yeah..
But they weren't involved?

Yeah right

   

I haven't sent my wife 12,000 texts in 20 years!
 

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:53 pm

Doesn't have any effect on the Grifty case.

When the person charging you with a crime lies under oath I'm assuming that's enough to get her removed from the case...


 

Spreading quickly, abc picks up the headlines.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-submits ... =107488801

BooRadley » 23 Feb 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:57 pm

When the person charging you with a crime lies under oath I'm assuming that's enough to get her removed from the case...

Perhaps...but it won't change Grifty's predicament.

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm

Perhaps...but it won't change Grifty's predicament.

 CNN picked it up...
OOps!
 

Where's Squatchman on this?

R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm

She built the case that convinced two grand juries to indict.

A prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sammich.  

n a grand jury proceeding, the prosecution presents evidence to the jury. The defense has no opportunity to challenge that evidence, to cross-examine witnesses, nor to present evidence of its own.