No...that's at trial..Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ A prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sammich.
n a grand jury proceeding, the prosecution presents evidence to the jury. The defense has no opportunity to challenge that evidence, to cross-examine witnesses, nor to present evidence of its own.
No **** it is at trial, Dum Dum. That is why it is not that hard to get an indictment from a grand jury. There is no defense. Duh!R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ No...that's at trial..
But they are afforded the opportunity to answer questions from grand jurors.
Grifty is very reluctant to take stands...
Not really.Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No **** it is at trial, Dum Dum. That is why it is not that hard to get an indictment from a grand jury. There is no defense. Duh!
Dum Dum, it gets tiring schoollin’ you all the time.
Im out, gotta date.
You saying there's an endless supply of ****** willing to suck the DNC tit for money and fame?
Dragging her father into court to explain to us "ignorant White Peoples" that using huge sums of left over campaign contributions in the form of cash for having fun is a "Negro Cultcha Thang" that the rest of us Bigots don't understand...R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ You do understand that this has no bearing on the case against Grifty, right?
You do realize this woman might have lied under oath right?R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ No...that's at trial..
But they are afforded the opportunity to answer questions from grand jurors.
Grifty is very reluctant to take stands...
You do realize that Grifty didn't even take the stand.BooRadley » 23 Feb 2024, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑ You do realize this woman might have lied under oath right?
Willis did.
Won't do Grifty much good.
Imagine....