Liberal Forum

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 8:46 am

what about the hundreds of judges appointed by your clown?

they follow the law, unlike your soros funded daughter

FJB » 29 Feb 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:00 am

they follow the law, unlike your soros funded daughter

when they ruled against Trump?

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:16 am

when they ruled against Trump?

What are laws intended to protect? What people believe or their time adapting as displaced? defending hypothetical scenarios to extinction doesn't save actual results adapting to the moment here.

maineman » 28 Feb 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 4:50 pm

Words above in green tell the story.  

from the same statute that says that ballots can be "mailed" by a designee of the person who applies for an absentee ballot:

"(c) (1) For purposes of this section, “mailed” means (A) sent by the United States Postal Service or any commercial carrier, courier or messenger service recognized and approved by the Secretary of the State, or (B) deposited in a secure drop box designated by the municipal clerk for such purpose."

Ergo:  as per the law....there is no requirement to deliver it to the clerk.  Just drop it in the mailbox or drop it in the drop box... or have your designee do it for you.  

So again... do you have any evidence that the black woman on your video clip dropping ballots into the drop box was NOT the designee of the people who cast those ballots?  YES OR NO

@Zeets2  

care to comment?  The law is pretty clear.

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:20 am

@Zeets2  

care to comment?  The law is pretty clear.

yes the law clearly protects deniers in every reality humanity intellectually created since dawn of civilization.

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:16 am

when they ruled against Trump?

Yep, unlike liberal judges protecting Biden

FJB » 29 Feb 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:34 am

Yep, unlike liberal judges protecting Biden

name one

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:39 am

name one

Which level of law enforcement commanding ancestries to assume social narratives or else be in contempt of societal evolution controlling genetic outcomes cradle to grave here now?

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:39 am

name one

wow you do live in a **** cave.... Garland who is pissed he wasn't seated on the Supreme Court is protecting the asshole.

FJB » 29 Feb 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:42 am

wow you do live in a **** cave.... Garland who is pissed he wasn't seated on the Supreme Court is protecting the asshole.

idiot, he isn't protecting a person, he is defending a process of controlling people cradle to grave. that bigger picture scenario everyone tells me to observe.
So I did.

Now you will get mad because you were caught in it also.

maineman » 28 Feb 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 4:50 pm

from the statute that says that ballots can be "mailed" by a designee of the person who applies for an absentee ballot:

"(c) (1) For purposes of this section, “mailed” means (B) deposited in a secure drop box designated by the municipal clerk for such purpose."

Ergo:  as per the law....there is no requirement to deliver it to the clerk.  Just drop it in the mailbox or drop it in the drop box... or have your designee do it for you.  

So again... do you have any evidence that the black woman on your video clip dropping ballots into the drop box was NOT the designee of the people who cast those ballots?  YES OR NO

Yes, unless you believe that every person dropping off dozens of ballots day after day at different drop boxes all around their cities was a designee for a sick or disabled person, it was illegal!
Those doing so should have had those ballots confirmed as coming from such an infirmed person in order to maintain compliance with the law.
Democrats found success using that loophole only because their ballot harvesting crimes were not all investigated.
When they WERE investigated, MANY were found to be guilty as you can see from the stories below, which you prefer to completely ignore, naturally.
(2) “Designee” means (A) a person who is caring for an absentee ballot applicant because of the applicant's illness or physical disability

These 6 Election Fraud Scandals Saw Overturned Results, Indictments
Fred Lucas 11/17/23
1. Caught on Camera in Connecticut Drop Box
A week before the general election in Bridgeport, Connecticut, state Judge William Clark tossed out the results of Democrats’ September primary  The judge called the evidence of fraud “shocking.” That evidence was on video, which shows the vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Committee apparently stuffing ballots into a drop box outside Bridgeport City Hall.

 

Arizona woman pleads guilty in ballot collection operation
CBS News 6/3/22
An Arizona woman accused of illegally collecting early ballots in the 2020 primary election pleaded guilty Thursday in an agreement with state prosecutors

 

Several Arrests Made, Felonies Charged in Texas Vote Harvesting Scheme
Town Hall by Ellie Bufkin 

 

Arizona Democrat Gets 30 Days in Jail for Harvesting a Total of 4 Ballots in ‘Sole Case’ Ever Prosecuted in State
AARON KELLER 10/15/22

 

The Top 3 Illegal Ballot Harvesting Cases That Should Be Prosecuted
PJ Media ATHENA THORNE 12/13/22

 

Illegal Ballot Harvesting: Dem AZ Ex-Mayor Finally Caught Red-Handed 
Western Journal By Randy DeSoto  6/7/22

 

Democrat alleges ballot harvesting widespread in Florida
FISM News 10/27/22

 

Ballot Harvesting Caught On Camera In Georgia And Pennsylvania
By US Politics And News  1/25/22

See what happens when such crimes were actually investigated?
But according to you, there were no ballot harvesting crimes, right?

 
 

FJB » 29 Feb 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:42 am

wow you do live in a **** cave.... Garland who is pissed he wasn't seated on the Supreme Court is protecting the asshole.

not a judge.

try again

Zeets2 » 29 Feb 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 9:53 am

Yes, unless you believe that every person dropping off dozens of ballots day after day at different drop boxes all around their cities was a designee for a sick or disabled person, it was illegal!
Those doing so should have had those ballots confirmed as coming from such an infirmed person in order to maintain compliance with the law.
Democrats found success using that loophole only because their ballot harvesting crimes were not all investigated.
When they WERE investigated, MANY were found to be guilty as you can see from the stories below, which you prefer to completely ignore, naturally.
(2) “Designee” means (A) a person who is caring for an absentee ballot applicant because of the applicant's illness or physical disability

See what happens when such crimes were actually investigated?
But according to you, there were no ballot harvesting crimes, right?

a whole lot of obfuscating and tap dancing to avoid answering this one simple question:

So again... do you have any evidence that the black woman on your video clip dropping ballots into the drop box was NOT the designee of the people who cast those ballots?  YES OR NO


and another one:  would you agree that all your **** cites of Connecticut law about delivering ballots to the town clerk were irrelevant and that designees can legally drop ballots into drop boxes at any hour of the day or night?  Y/N

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:21 am

not a judge.

try again

he could have been, but patriots saw right threw him...

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:26 am

a whole lot of obfuscating and tap dancing to avoid answering this one simple question:

So again... do you have any evidence that the black woman on your video clip dropping ballots into the drop box was NOT the designee of the people who cast those ballots?  YES OR NO

and another one:  would you agree that all your **** cites of Connecticut law about delivering ballots to the town clerk were irrelevant and that designees can legally drop ballots into drop boxes at any hour of the day or night?  Y/N

You can't claim a person was innocent of a crime simply because her particular case wasn't prosecuted.
If I rob a bank, it doesn't become legal if I'm not caught, does it?

As for part two of your question, delivering ballots to the town clerk would have been the LEGAL way for one person to submit dozens of ballots.
She chose the illegal way and was lucky enough not to be prosecuted for it.
Do YOU have any evidence that every one of her ballots was legitimate because they came from disabled people who assigned her to be their designee?

Zeets2 » 29 Feb 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:35 am

You can't claim a person was innocent of a crime simply because her particular case wasn't prosecuted.
If I rob a bank, it doesn't become legal if I'm not caught, does it?

As for part two of your question, delivering ballots to the town clerk would have been the LEGAL way for one person to submit dozens of ballots.
She chose the illegal way and was lucky enough not to be prosecuted for it.
Do YOU have any evidence that every one of her ballots was legitimate because they came from disabled people who assigned her to be their designee?

There was nothing illegal about her actions.  She wasn't even arrested or charged with a crime.

In America, innocence is PRESUMED.

Designees are legally allowed under Connecticut law, to mail completed absentee ballots. She used a totally legal method that was specifically enumerated in that law.

I don't need any evidence to prove her presumed innocence, the burden is solely on you to prove her guilt, which you aren't quite man enough to admit you don't have.  

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:40 am

There was nothing illegal about her actions.  She wasn't even arrested or charged with a crime.

In America, innocence is PRESUMED.

Designees are legally allowed under Connecticut law, to mail completed absentee ballots. She used a totally legal method that was specifically enumerated in that law.

I don't need any evidence to prove her presumed innocence, the burden is solely on you to prove her guilt, which you aren't quite man enough to admit you don't have.

she committed fraud, she is now out of a job

FJB » 29 Feb 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:34 am

he could have been, but patriots saw right threw him...

Patriots are loyal to ideology regardless the reality defined serving God, Country, humanity first and to hell with survival of the species beyond last generation arriving one at a time now commanded to serve what previous 4 have done throughout history sustaining current events so far.

FJB » 29 Feb 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:46 am

she committed fraud, she is now out of a job

link?

   

maineman » 29 Feb 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Feb 2024, 10:54 am

link?

you never give links... **** off you POS fake