nefarious101 » 01 Mar 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Trump terrifies you doesn't he?.....you are [sic]have become completely irrational. You can't even think normally...hope you still have at least some control over your bodily functions...but I doubt it from what I see here
Ever here the attitude about being fired? "I was looking for a job when I found this one.".
1) So you've never been questioned by police or another authority to CONFIRM that the law was followed when there may be a suspicion of wrongdoing?maineman » 01 Mar 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ 1. You have ZERO evidence the law was not followed. Dropping ballots into drop boxes IS legal.
2. I do, in fact, have compassion for those who have been dealt a rough hand through no fault of their own. YOU? You have richly earned and deserve every bit of my disdain and my derisive laughter.
3. I know a great deal about classified documents. I actually had a TS (SCI)(CNWDI) clearance.
And I know, as you keep tap dancing away from, that the Espionage Act does not require any level of classification. And his claim to be able to unilaterally declassify anything and eveything by merely thinking about it WILL be challenged in court. The reason it's never been challenged in court up until now is that we have never had a traitorous insurrectionist as President before.
4. You guarantee it? Now that's self-aggrandizement and self-illusion taken to new levels!
3) How wonderful for you! But apparently you know NOTHING about the presidential power TO DECLASSIFY THEM! And your feeble excuse for why it's suddenly an issue is a **** joke! Trump HAS NEVER been charged with treason OR being an insurrectionist, has he, you lying scumbag?the mentally retarded paraplegic begging for nickels on the street corner is sad... even as I chuckle at him.
1. Did anyone question the lady in question? Seems like the authorities didn't see anything anywhere near as suspicious as you did. Again... if you want to have the police investigate suspicious behavior, that would be up to your local municipality. Have at it. As it is, there is nothing illegal about dropping ballots into drop boxes. AND, UNLIKE THE **** YOU WERE TRYING TO PAWN OFF OVER THE PAST FEW DAYS, PEOPLE IN OHIO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO DROP OFF BALLOTS AT TO MUNICIPAL CLERKS. OUCH. Care to retract that claim, now, that it has been anally reinserted for you?Zeets2 » 01 Mar 2024, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) So you've never been questioned by police or another authority to CONFIRM that the law was followed when there may be a suspicion of wrongdoing? And dropping multiple ballots in a drop box without following the mandatory requirements IS ILLEGAL! Are you trying to tell me that it's not suspicious activity to watch a person dropping dozens of ballots in different drop boxes around the city day after day is not suspicious activity and likely criminal? To you, of course it's not, because you know what they're doing will benefit the asshole you love so much!
2) Sure you do! Are these NOT your exact words?:
3) How wonderful for you! But apparently you know NOTHING about the presidential power TO DECLASSIFY THEM! And your feeble excuse for why it's suddenly an issue is a **** joke! Trump HAS NEVER been charged with treason OR being an insurrectionist, has he, you lying scumbag?
And if that's the law, then why wasn't it challenged when Obama did it with millions of classified documents, or when Hillary did it with classified documents WHICH SHE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO HAVE IN HER POSSESSION, AND WHY DID THEY REFUSE TO PROSECUTE HER AFTER DESTROYING THOSE THAT WERE ON HER ILLEGAL SERVER IN AN UNSECURE LOCATION AND EVEN UNDER SUBPOENA AT THE TIME? And how is it that a Democrat ***-kissing judge can tell us that Biden is too demented to be responsible for stealing the classified docs that HE had in SEVERAL unsecure locations WHICH HE NEVER HAD AUTHORITY TO TAKE WHEN AS VP? That kind of selective prosecution is exactly what scumbag libs like you cheer for, even as you know damn well that it destroys any argument you idiots have about the two-tier justice system you hero has forced through the corrupt DOJ, SOLELY AGAINST TRUMP, EVEN THOUGH HE HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY THEM WHEN HILLARY OR BIDEN DID NOT!!!
4) So why can't YOU guarantee that the Trump case WILL NOT be overturned by the SC if you really believe they have a case? And while we're waiting for that inevitable outcome, why don't you back up your idiotic opinion that the banks were the victims of the fraud you claim that Trump's guilty of? WHICH BANKS said they were defrauded, OR ADMIT WHAT A LYING SCUMBAG WE ALL KNOW YOU ARE!
maineman » 01 Mar 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ ^^^non-responsive to any of the questions I posed to you. Typical
Let me, however, answer your questions:
The clown doesn't terrify me. I certainly am concerned about the damage he can do to the country with four more years in office, but I remain eternally optimistic about the resilience of American democracy. There will be life after Trump. And it will be better than life DURING Trump.
I am completely rational, AND I am literate, which you seem to fall short of quite often as demonstrated by your routine failings at basic sentence composition.
And I am wondering how one could possibly gain insight into anyone else's bodily functions simply by reading keyboard-entered text on a computer monitor. You must have gotten laughed off the schoolyard if that is the quality of your trash-talking. Weak. Very weak.
1) OF COURSE NOT, FOOL! THE FIX WAS IN! What liberal city that had people stuffing the ballot boxes with fraudulent votes IS NOT completely run by corrupt Democrats? Would you expect anything else in Philly? Chicago? NY? LA? Newark? Baltimore? San Francisco? Portland? Seattle? DC? There isn't ONE SINGLE DEMOCRAT in any of those liberal cities who would DARE go against their corrupt party and make sure their voting was done honestly UNLESS they thought they'd have to keep Republican voters honest in their election by doing so! You KNOW it TOOK PLACE as well as I do, but you'll happily ignore the obvious criminality for the scumbag you love. You KNOW it's the only way an ignorant, corrupt racist like Biden could have won.maineman » 01 Mar 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Seems like the authorities didn't see anything anywhere near as suspicious as you did.
2. Tongue in cheek, I assure you.
3. The former president even told someone at Bedminster than he really shouldn't be showing them documents because they were - his words - "classified".
4. I would never presume to be able to guarantee anything that the Supreme Court of the United States might do
"The minute the president speaks about it to someone, he has the ability to declassify anything at any time without any process."
By Louis Jacobson 5/16/17
Washington Post says Trump had "revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a WH meeting" didn’t just put the White House on the defensive. A member of Congress who commented after the newspaper’s revelations was Sen. James Risch, R-ID. According to CNN, he told reporters, "The minute the president speaks about it to someone, he has the ability to declassify anything at any time without any process." Independent experts said Risch is on target concerning the legal powers of the president. A president’s classification and declassification powers are broad. Experts agreed that the president, as commander in chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. The majority ruling in the 1988 Supreme Court case Dept of Navy vs. Egan — addressed the legal recourse of a Navy employee who had been denied a security clearance — addresses this line of authority."The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the US" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, said that such authority gives the president the authority to "classify and declassify at will."
nefarious101 » 01 Mar 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ sure he terrifies you....otherwise why are you here "COMPLETELY RATIONAL" (your words) flipping out about Trump...AKA TDS.
Looks like you just denied what your [sic] doing and then still did it anyway....completely rational....excuse me now...because I need to ROTFLMFAO...at you!
1. cool story. no proof, just slanderous unsubstantiated allegations of a sore loser.Zeets2 » 01 Mar 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) OF COURSE NOT, FOOL! THE FIX WAS IN! What liberal city that had people stuffing the ballot boxes with fraudulent votes IS NOT completely run by corrupt Democrats? Would you expect anything else in Philly? Chicago? NY? LA? Newark? Baltimore? San Francisco? Portland? Seattle? DC? There isn't ONE SINGLE DEMOCRAT in any of those liberal cities who would DARE go against their corrupt party and make sure their voting was done honestly UNLESS they thought they'd have to keep Republican voters honest in their election by doing so! You KNOW it TOOK PLACE as well as I do, but you'll happily ignore the obvious criminality for the scumbag you love. You KNOW it's the only way an ignorant, corrupt racist like Biden could have won.
2) There were PLENTY of illegal ballots being placed in ballot boxes, and it SHOULD have been a requirement to submit dozens of ballots ONLY to the clerk! If they WEREN'T doing something completely illegal, THEN WHY DID SO MANY OF THEM DRIVE AROUND THE CITY TO DROP OFF THEIR PHONY BALLOTS IN DIFFERENT BOXES?
3) You claim to know all about classified docs, but you don't know ****!
Here are the facts:
Yes Trump was showing top secret docs that he knew he had taken from the white housemaineman » 01 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. cool story. no proof, just slanderous unsubstantiated allegations of a sore loser.
2. ditto
3. Trump told a visitor to Bedminster - after leaving office - that he really ought not to let the individual see the documents on his desk because they were, in his words, "classified". He may have had the authority to declassify something WHILE he was CINC, but he certainly does not retain that authority after leaving office. If the documents in his Bedminster office were classified in 2021, they were never declassified. AND AGAIN... the main fact that you have hidden from in this exchange of posts - VIOLATIONS OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH "CLASSIFIED" DOCUMENTS.
maineman » 01 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The only things that terrify me are grizzle bears, sharks, and alligators. Certainly not a bumbling loser like Donald Trump. I do worry somewhat about what will happen to my country in the near term regarding the near-deification of Trump by his TAP(Trump Adoration Psychosis)-suffering MAGA minions, but I have been around long enough to be confident in my country's ability to move beyond him, whether we do it in 2024 or 2028. It's not a matter of if, only when.
you're - your - yore,
way - weigh - whey,
they're - their - there,
which - witch - wich,
here - hear
believe it or not, they are NOT interchangeable!
No he fears for America from a 91 count four indicted. President that attacked our country ilon jan.6th.nefarious101 » 01 Mar 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ you're not here suffering from bear, shark or alligator derangement Syndrome are you?...you here posting and flailing around about Trump...they call that TDS...and you've just been diagnosed.
You're to the point you can't even control yourself
nefarious101 » 01 Mar 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ you're not here suffering from bear, shark or alligator derangement Syndrome are you?...you [sic]here posting and flailing around about Trump...they call that TDS...and you've just been diagnosed.
You're to the point you can't even control yourself
maineman » 01 Mar 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not flailing at all. I am commenting on the news of the day and the political season we find ourselves in. I live in Maine. It's cold outside. I don't ski or snowmobile. I walk my dog, and I spend time indoors, in front of my fireplace, with a cup of coffee, surfing the web. I read a variety of news sites, sports sites, play a little online bridge, and come here and post my thoughts and impressions. Unlike you, my grammar is reflective of higher learning. And trust me, if you and your fellow MAGA morons were not getting ready to put Trump at the top of your party's 2024 slate of candidates, I wouldn't say a word about him. Your TAP is what brings him into my posts, not my TDS. I am not deranged about him at all. I see him for what he is, a fat clod who has to buy ******, and a terrible loser who can't get over the fact that Joe Biden kicked his ***. Kinda like you but with SOME money.
Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No he fears for America from a 91 count four indicted. President that attacked our country ilon jan.6th.
And you like trump because he is a criminal.
nefarious101 » 01 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ you're still in the middle of an actual TDS fit....see....you got TDS so bad you can't control yourself...I know TDS when I see it...and you got it bad...real bad
maineman » 01 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You know what Bertram Russell answered when asked how fascism starts?
"First they fascinate the fools, then they muzzle the intelligent".
And I know TAP when I see it, and you've got it really bad.
nefarious101 » 01 Mar 2024, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ you don't know **** Russia Russia Russia boy....yeah...I said boy...didn't even ask your preferred pronouns...there's only 2 genders....got it?....now you got something else to bitch about
Oh shut the **** up you goddamn lying communist cocksucking piece of dog ****.maineman » 23 Feb 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ A great article and a relatively short read for you MAGAts and ESLers:
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/39 ... st-decade/
Dobbs, Georgia, The ineptitude of the House majority, and Trump continuing to rail about racial purity and immigrants ruining America are all counter-productive to the GOP finding their mojo again anytime soon.
Add to that, the Democrat's superior GOTV ground game and 2024 is looking bleak for the Grand Old Party, even before any felony convictions drive nails into its coffin.![]()
Zeets2 » 01 Mar 2024, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) So you've never been questioned by police or another authority to CONFIRM that the law was followed when there may be a suspicion of wrongdoing?
My, how boring a life you must lead as such a hermit! You were NEVER checked going through an airport? Never asked for ID as a punk kid trying to buy beer? Never checked by a cop to see a valid license and registration or insurance? Never asked for ID picking up a prescription? Going through the DMV? Buying pot at your local dispensary? Opening a bank account or cashing a check anywhere? How come all THOSE (and many more) examples ARE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THAT YOU'RE FOLLOWING THE LAW, but it's not needed when you cast a vote in an election?
Come on, show us your great wisdom why that is, genius!
And dropping multiple ballots in a drop box without following the mandatory requirements IS ILLEGAL! Are you trying to tell me that it's not suspicious activity to watch a person dropping dozens of ballots in different drop boxes around the city day after day is not suspicious activity and likely criminal? To you, of course it's not, because you know what they're doing will benefit the asshole you love so much!
2) Sure you do! Are these NOT your exact words?:
3) How wonderful for you! But apparently you know NOTHING about the presidential power TO DECLASSIFY THEM! And your feeble excuse for why it's suddenly an issue is a **** joke! Trump HAS NEVER been charged with treason OR being an insurrectionist, has he, you lying scumbag?
And if that's the law, then why wasn't it challenged when Obama did it with millions of classified documents, or when Hillary did it with classified documents WHICH SHE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO HAVE IN HER POSSESSION, AND WHY DID THEY REFUSE TO PROSECUTE HER AFTER DESTROYING THOSE THAT WERE ON HER ILLEGAL SERVER IN AN UNSECURE LOCATION AND EVEN UNDER SUBPOENA AT THE TIME? And how is it that a Democrat ***-kissing judge can tell us that Biden is too demented to be responsible for stealing the classified docs that HE had in SEVERAL unsecure locations WHICH HE NEVER HAD AUTHORITY TO TAKE WHEN AS VP? That kind of selective prosecution is exactly what scumbag libs like you cheer for, even as you know damn well that it destroys any argument you idiots have about the two-tier justice system you hero has forced through the corrupt DOJ, SOLELY AGAINST TRUMP, EVEN THOUGH HE HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY THEM WHEN HILLARY OR BIDEN DID NOT!!!
4) So why can't YOU guarantee that the Trump case WILL NOT be overturned by the SC if you really believe they have a case? And while we're waiting for that inevitable outcome, why don't you back up your idiotic opinion that the banks were the victims of the fraud you claim that Trump's guilty of? WHICH BANKS said they were defrauded, OR ADMIT WHAT A LYING SCUMBAG WE ALL KNOW YOU ARE!
^^^^^^^ one triggered bitch!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^murdock » 01 Mar 2024, 9:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh shut the **** up you goddamn lying communist cocksucking piece of dog ****.