Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 24 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm

exactly...the crap now with IVF...

The Alabama Supreme Court issued the ruling.  Do you think a lot of leftists sit on that court?


Reproductive Choice is in the news not because leftists put it there, but because two conservative courts did.  Own it.

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm

The Alabama Supreme Court issued the ruling.  Do you think a lot of leftists sit on that court?


Reproductive Choice is in the news not because leftists put it there, but because two conservative courts did.  Own it.

do they live in urban sprawl? yes.

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm

The Alabama Supreme Court issued the ruling.  Do you think a lot of leftists sit on that court?

Reproductive Choice is in the news not because leftists put it there, but because two conservative courts did.  Own it.

What are the actual legal implications of the ruling? when googling it, all I find are wadded up panties w/o explanation...
 

ROG62 » 24 Feb 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 6:11 pm

What are the actual legal implications of the ruling? when googling it, all I find are wadded up panties w/o explanation...

Hey... when someone said, The Left is desperately doing everything imaginable to make Abortion not only the top issue, but the only issue to Voters

you replied, "exactly...the crap now with IVF."

If you DON'T have a ****  clue what you are talking about, and it certainly appears as if you don't, why the knee-jerk move to blame it on the left when it was the Alabama Supreme Court who proclaimed embryos people, not the left?  And it certainly wasn't the left who tossed Roe v. Wade into the dumpster.  

**** OWN IT.  

If you don't want the women of America to vote against the Republican party because of their positions on reproductive freedom, then you should change your positions.  I mean, how the **** did you expect women to react when you all did that stupid ****?  

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 7:19 pm

Hey... when someone said, The Left is desperately doing everything imaginable to make Abortion not only the top issue, but the only issue to Voters

you replied, "exactly...the crap now with IVF."

If you DON'T have a ****  clue what you are talking about, and it certainly appears as if you don't, why the knee-jerk move to blame it on the left when it was the Alabama Supreme Court who proclaimed embryos people, not the left?  And it certainly wasn't the left who tossed Roe v. Wade into the dumpster.  

**** OWN IT.  

If you don't want the women of America to vote against the Republican party because of their positions on reproductive freedom, then you should change your positions.  I mean, how the **** did you expect women to react when you all did that stupid ****?

So... what exactly does the Alabama SC ruling do?

All I can see is that they said is that the embryos created through IVF are defined the same as embryos created naturally.

So, what are the implications of the ruling applied to stated law?

I haven't been able to find any... unless you're reading something I'm not.

 
 

ROG62 » 24 Feb 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 6:11 pm

What are the actual legal implications of the ruling? when googling it, all I find are wadded up panties w/o explanation...
 

sure sign leftists run the court. when it reads like sharia law it usually is some type of sharia law.

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 7:19 pm

Hey... when someone said, The Left is desperately doing everything imaginable to make Abortion not only the top issue, but the only issue to Voters

you replied, "exactly...the crap now with IVF."

If you DON'T have a ****  clue what you are talking about, and it certainly appears as if you don't, why the knee-jerk move to blame it on the left when it was the Alabama Supreme Court who proclaimed embryos people, not the left?  And it certainly wasn't the left who tossed Roe v. Wade into the dumpster.  

**** OWN IT.  

If you don't want the women of America to vote against the Republican party because of their positions on reproductive freedom, then you should change your positions.  I mean, how the **** did you expect women to react when you all did that stupid ****?

Exactly as the abortion drum beats itself into eternity, along comes IVF and they freshly piss themselves...

I'm saying is they're all wadded up and in EVERY news blurb they mention abortion, roe vs wade and/or women's rights...

now tell me WTF are the actual implications they're pissing themselves over in relation to what the ruling is...

no one has yet to put it in writing...
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 7:38 pm

So... what exactly does the Alabama SC ruling do?

All I can see is that they said is that the embryos created through IVF are defined the same as embryos created naturally.

So, what are the implications of the ruling applied to stated law?

I haven't been able to find any... unless you're reading something I'm not.

Exactly...all you get are the abortion, roe vs wade and women's rights' drumbeats...yet no explanation as to how it affects them...

christ, their panties are wadded up so tight they're gasping for air like fish out of water....

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm

The Alabama Supreme Court issued the ruling.  Do you think a lot of leftists sit on that court?

Reproductive Choice is in the news not because leftists put it there, but because two conservative courts did.  Own it.

**** that .....
It's in the news because the majority of so called news is now just government mouthpieces .....
like you ....

 

ROG62 » 24 Feb 2024, 11:52 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 11:52 pm

Exactly as the abortion drum beats itself into eternity, along comes IVF and they freshly piss themselves...

I'm saying is they're all wadded up and in EVERY news blurb they mention abortion, roe vs wade and/or women's rights...

now tell me WTF are the actual implications they're pissing themselves over in relation to what the ruling is...

no one has yet to put it in writing...
 
 

Debating what if is always avoiding what does to protect what about scenarios governing people left adapting as displaced ancestrally here balancing between inception and extinction spontaneously alive since conceived each generation gap timing ancestors apart in plain sight now, regardless the intellectual time zone and temperate zone geographically living.

Obeying whether and adapting to weather.

ROG62 » 24 Feb 2024, 11:59 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 11:59 pm

Exactly...all you get are the abortion, roe vs wade and women's rights' drumbeats...yet no explanation as to how it affects them...

christ, their panties are wadded up so tight they're gasping for air like fish out of water....

             And the bottom line remains despite their hand-wringing, hysterics and wishful thinking regarding Abortion --- it is not as important an issue to Voters than the Economy, Immigration, Inflation, Foreign Policy -- 

             So, while I believe it's true that overall the GOP has shot itself in the foot regarding Abortion, in the case of the top issues I mentioned, Biden and the Democrats have blown their own legs off... 

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 7:19 pm

Hey... when someone said, The Left is desperately doing everything imaginable to make Abortion not only the top issue, but the only issue to Voters

you replied, "exactly...the crap now with IVF."

If you DON'T have a ****  clue what you are talking about, and it certainly appears as if you don't, why the knee-jerk move to blame it on the left when it was the Alabama Supreme Court who proclaimed embryos people, not the left?  And it certainly wasn't the left who tossed Roe v. Wade into the dumpster.  

**** OWN IT.  

If you don't want the women of America to vote against the Republican party because of their positions on reproductive freedom, then you should change your positions.  I mean, how the **** did you expect women to react when you all did that stupid ****?

It's not a woman's body that's being killed, it's a baby's body, Sherlock......**** OWN THAT, TARD!
 

Kobia2 » 25 Feb 2024, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 6:42 am

             And the bottom line remains despite their hand-wringing, hysterics and wishful thinking regarding Abortion --- it is not as important an issue to Voters than the Economy, Immigration, Inflation, Foreign Policy -- 

             So, while I believe it's true that overall the GOP has shot itself in the foot regarding Abortion, in the case of the top issues I mentioned, Biden and the Democrats have blown their own legs off... 

unfortunately where democrats are concerned, when abortion, roe vs wade or women's healthcare are mentioned, it's "look, SQUIRREL!!!"
 

RebelGator » 25 Feb 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 6:51 am

It's not a woman's body that's being killed, it's a baby's body, Sherlock......**** OWN THAT, TARD!

these people are severely stuck on stupid..  
 

RebelGator » 25 Feb 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 6:51 am

It's not a woman's body that's being killed, it's a baby's body, Sherlock......**** OWN THAT, TARD!

  What baby?
       
 

RebelGator » 25 Feb 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 6:51 am

It's not a woman's body that's being killed, it's a baby's body, Sherlock......**** OWN THAT, TARD!

IMO, anyone who equates an embryo to a baby's body is the retard.

Squatchman » 25 Feb 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 8:34 am

  What baby?
:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
 

Look you believe life only exists between womb to tomb and every body in inhabited by some supernatural intellect with no form or shape unless there is a body to inhabit at birth.

Yet chromosomes show how inaccurate all your facts have been throughout history of your ancestry reciting the same bullsjhit for thousands of years that living isn't self evident life is the specificity of adapting here now genetics eternally separates the numbers LEFT adapting as displaced conceived to decomposed and that ends when great great grandchildren aren't born anymore replacing their previous 4 generation gaps here now.

See your educated stupidity says the future unfolds so that leaves the past ending here specifically by the numbers "left" folds current events into unfolding specifically evolving as displaced in exact ancestral positions doing the world is but a stage production of everyone denying life in plain sight now, right?

except me. Nostradamus' "one male" prophecy.

maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 8:52 am

IMO, anyone who equates an embryo to a baby's body is the retard.

how's that ruling explanation coming along?
 

RedheadedStranger » 23 Feb 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2024, 2:22 pm

I've been hearing since probably 2001 or so that the GOP is "dead".

Gone... ain't never coming back, etc etc...

 
​​​​​​

I just heard the same people predicting Earth would be "ice free" by 2012 now predict the world will be "ice free" in 50 to 60 years....and we could all be dead with a 500 million year time frame.

Why wouldn't you believe those same people telling you the GOP is dead every year since Billy "Blisters" and Hillary were in the White House?...

Embryos are not people.
You can freeze an embryo and it'll be fine.
If you freeze a person you've got some explaining to do.