Liberal Forum

golfboy » 06 Mar 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 7:19 pm

No, I'm saying she's racist because of her racist actions. 
*******.

nothing about her actions was racist.  She disqualified the only juror in the jury pool who had not graduated from high school from a case where the defense argument was known to be extremely complex.  The Maine Supreme Court agreed with her decision.  The Federal Appeals Court agreed with her decision, and when the defense attorney couldn't take "no" for an answer and had the foolish temerity to ask SCOTUS, they tossed it back in his face.  NO racism.  Sorry.  

You did, apparently, like the sound of her voice during her argument, however, because you called her multiple times to listen to her voicemail message while you jacked off.

golfboy » 06 Mar 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 7:19 pm

No, I'm saying she's racist because of her racist actions. 
*******.
 

Anti-discrimination law creates racism every next generation gap defining people by race, creed, color, national origin, gender biases, and all that social comparison crap of who's who.

maineman » 06 Mar 2024, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:16 pm

nothing about her actions was racist.  She disqualified the only juror in the jury pool who had not graduated from high school from a case where the defense argument was known to be extremely complex.  The Maine Supreme Court agreed with her decision.  The Federal Appeals Court agreed with her decision, and when the defense attorney couldn't take "no" for an answer and had the foolish temerity to ask SCOTUS, they tossed it back in his face.  NO racism.  Sorry.  

You did, apparently, like the sound of her voice during her argument, however, because you called her multiple times to listen to her voicemail message while you jacked off.

She booted the only black juror, because he WAS black. 
 

maineman » 06 Mar 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:08 pm

you just won't admit to your sins.

pathetic.

No sin to admit to.   You made the entire story up. 

 

maineman » 06 Mar 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:08 pm

you just won't admit to your sins.

pathetic.

What is a sin? Defying life evolving in your own skin, defying humanity promising better tomorrow's, believing now isn't eternity, demanding humans have rights to pretend one isn't limited to simply adapting to the moment here as a whole species here now.

golfboy » 06 Mar 2024, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:29 pm

She booted the only black juror, because he WAS black.

incorrect.  She explained her rationale completely.  You were too busy masturbating to the sound of her voice to grasp the validity of her argument.  Every other court in the land agreed with her. 

golfboy » 06 Mar 2024, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:30 pm

No sin to admit to.   You made the entire story up.

false.  Your disgusting doxxing and stalking got you booted from dot org for a week as I can recall.  

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 8:47 am

false.  Your disgusting doxxing and stalking got you booted from dot org for a week as I can recall.

Nope.  
You really can't tell the truth about anything, can you?
 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 8:46 am

incorrect.  She explained her rationale completely.  You were too busy masturbating to the sound of her voice to grasp the validity of her argument.  Every other court in the land agreed with her.

Her rational was that he was black and therefore too stupid to understand the facts of the case.
And being the only black man on the panel, he had to be removed so she could get a conviction. 

 

golfboy » 07 Mar 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:05 pm

Her rational was that he was black and therefore too stupid to understand the facts of the case.
And being the only black man on the panel, he had to be removed so she could get a conviction.

an absolute lie.  Her rationale was that he was the only member of the jury pool who did not have at least a high education.  As I have said again and again... NO court in the land agrees with you, and EVERY one that reviewed the case agreed with her.

golfboy » 07 Mar 2024, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:04 pm

Nope.  
You really can't tell the truth about anything, can you?

total truth.  prove me wrong or crawl away.

I'll wait, but I certainly won't hold my breath.
 
 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:48 pm

total truth.  prove me wrong or crawl away.

I'll wait, but I certainly won't hold my breath.

You're the idiot that claimed I called your daughter, *******. 
It's not my job to prove you lied.  You always do.
 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:46 pm

an absolute lie.  Her rationale was that he was the only member of the jury pool who did not have at least a high education.  As I have said again and again... NO court in the land agrees with you, and EVERY one that reviewed the case agreed with her.

Racist bitch.

 
 

golfboy » 07 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm

Racist bitch.

^^ a foolish position without any actual standing.

You are so on the wrong side of history.

golfboy » 07 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm

You're the idiot that claimed I called your daughter, *******. 
It's not my job to prove you lied.  You always do.

did you get actually banned at dot org for your call or not?

I don't need to prove anything.  Your own words prove that your sick claim of listening to the entire argument to the Maine Supreme Court clearly demonstrates your own inherent racism. Her argument clearly explained how race was not the issue at all. Every court in the land that reviewed her decision agreed with her and NOT you.  Wow.  Color me surprised.
 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:35 pm

did you get actually banned at dot org for your call or not?

I don't need to prove anything.  Your own words prove that your sick claim of listening to the entire argument to the Maine Supreme Court clearly demonstrates your own inherent racism. Her argument clearly explained how race was not the issue at all. Every court in the land that reviewed her decision agreed with her and NOT you.  Wow.  Color me surprised.

How could I get banned over something that didn't happen, Low IQ?
 

golfboy » 08 Mar 2024, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:52 pm

How could I get banned over something that didn't happen, Low IQ?

good question, that your week-long banning succinctly answers!  lol

maineman » 08 Mar 2024, 11:48 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 11:48 pm

good question, that your week-long banning succinctly answers!  lol

Every corrupted contextual soul defies any sole displacement life is self evident living doesn't exceed series parallel time sharing space here now as conceived to decomposed uniquely displaced geographically occupying the moment here.

Recite what people believed every generation gap since dawn of civilization recorded how people behaved serving artificial possibilities cradle to grave every generation gap linking this species occupying space one at a time still working now.

the desire to control tomorrow makes everyone deny how they arrived as displaced in an ever changing form arrived as a fertilized cell in the generation gap their one time adapting took place or occupying time as conceived to replace their 30 previous dna donors of the previous 4 generations dictating outcomes during each rotation f the planet, orbit of the moon, opposing seasonal shifts, each revolution sustaining 3rd from the star, solar system spiraling in this galaxy, like every other galaxy working same way separately here, thermodynamics 101, debunks ever philosophical ideology, psychological practice, physically defying self evident results being one reproduction mutually evolving in series parallel arrangement since inception to the food chain isolated in this atmosphere living eternally separated now.

Balance point in time occupying space spontaneously present simultaneously evolving uniquely here in ever changing form fertilized cell to decomposed corpse could become fossil fuels in another few million revolutions around the same star over and over promising next generations nobody can prove self evident results in any alternate reality left.

maineman » 08 Mar 2024, 11:48 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 11:48 pm

good question, that your week-long banning succinctly answers!  lol

That had nothing to do with your daughter.  But go ahead and invent some more stupid stories.  
It's all you can do. 

It was hilarous that you made up a story and didn't bother to even question a pay phone.   At a trailer park that didn't even exist anymore.     

golfboy » 09 Mar 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Mar 2024, 7:29 pm

That had nothing to do with your daughter.  But go ahead and invent some more stupid stories.  
It's all you can do. 

It was hilarous that you made up a story and didn't bother to even question a pay phone.   At a trailer park that didn't even exist anymore.   

I know that kfools banned you for a week for doxxing my daughter and bragging about listening to her arguments before the Maine State Supreme Court.

I know all I did was enter a telephone number into a reverse directory, and the number that called my daughter twice was listed as a pay phone in your hometown.

Coincidence?  I think not.