Liberal Forum

maineman » 27 Feb 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 2:55 pm

you never gave me the CT law because there is not one that would preclude that woman from dropping off the absentee ballots all cast by the elderly ladies in her church Bible Study group in that authorized drop box..

more because we said so mantra.

maineman » 27 Feb 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 2:55 pm

you never gave me the CT law because there is not one that would preclude that woman from dropping off the absentee ballots all cast by the elderly ladies in her church Bible Study group in that authorized drop box..

Oh really?  Did those "elderly ladies" hand the ballots over to the municipal clerk AS THE LAW REQUIRES, show proper ID and sign their names in the presence of the clerk?  OR DID THEY JUST DROP OFF PILES OF BALLOTS IN A DROP BOX ILLEGALLY?

Read the damn law, jerkoff!
You see?  Even when you have the PROOF of the illegally harvested ballots YOU CLOSE YOUR EYES AND IGNORE IT!  What a surprise!

 (4) it is returned by a member of the immediate family of the absentee voter, in person, to said clerk not later than the close of the polls on the day of the election A person returning an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk pursuant to subdivision (3) or (4) of this subsection shall present identification and, on the outer envelope of the absentee ballot, sign his name in the presence of the clerk, and indicate his address, his relationship to the voter, and the date and time of such return. “Immediate family” means a dependent relative who resides in the individual's household or any spouse, child or parent of the individual.
 

maineman » 27 Feb 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:51 am

Yo... @Zeets2   cat got your tongue?

Still digging into those CT law books?

       

Who's laughing now that I've shoved the proof up you nose, nitwit?
 

Zeets2 » 27 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm

Who's laughing now that I've shoved the proof up you [sic] nose, nitwit?

nothing legally prevents a black woman from carrying the ballots of all of the elderly women in her bible study group to the drop box for them.

Zeets2 » 27 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm

Oh really?  Did those "elderly ladies" hand the ballots over to the municipal clerk AS THE LAW REQUIRES, show proper ID and sign their names in the presence of the clerk?  OR DID THEY JUST DROP OFF PILES OF BALLOTS IN A DROP BOX ILLEGALLY?

Read the damn law, jerkoff!
You see?  Even when you have the PROOF of the illegally harvested ballots YOU CLOSE YOUR EYES AND IGNORE IT!  What a surprise!

 (4) it is returned by a member of the immediate family of the absentee voter, in person, to said clerk not later than the close of the polls on the day of the election A person returning an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk pursuant to subdivision (3) or (4) of this subsection shall present identification and, on the outer envelope of the absentee ballot, sign his name in the presence of the clerk, and indicate his address, his relationship to the voter, and the date and time of such return. “Immediate family” means a dependent relative who resides in the individual's household or any spouse, child or parent of the individual.

or they could put them in drop boxes a week before  if they don't want to go to the clerk on election day.

Zeets2 » 27 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm

Oh really?  Did those "elderly ladies" hand the ballots over to the municipal clerk AS THE LAW REQUIRES, show proper ID and sign their names in the presence of the clerk?  OR DID THEY JUST DROP OFF PILES OF BALLOTS IN A DROP BOX ILLEGALLY?

Read the damn law, jerkoff!
You see?  Even when you have the PROOF of the illegally harvested ballots YOU CLOSE YOUR EYES AND IGNORE IT!  What a surprise!

 (4) it is returned by a member of the immediate family of the absentee voter, in person, to said clerk not later than the close of the polls on the day of the election A person returning an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk pursuant to subdivision (3) or (4) of this subsection shall present identification and, on the outer envelope of the absentee ballot, sign his name in the presence of the clerk, and indicate his address, his relationship to the voter, and the date and time of such return. “Immediate family” means a dependent relative who resides in the individual's household or any spouse, child or parent of the individual.

here in Ohio 

they returned our ballots to us because we didn’t put our birthdates

record absentee and mail in ballots in 20

tRump won

go figure

why wouldnt they rig the election in the state that has gone with the winning candidate for the last 16 years?

tRump broke that streak 

why did they chance the optics of that?


 

maineman » 27 Feb 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 3:43 pm

or they could put them in drop boxes a week before  if they don't want to go to the clerk on election day.

Where does the law I quoted say ANYTHING about which days they apply?
Or do you normally just make up a comfortable schedule for yourself despite what the law require?
 

maineman » 27 Feb 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 3:43 pm

or they could put them in drop boxes a week before  if they don't want to go to the clerk on election day.

Not legally they can't!
But legalities don't matter much to spoiled Democrats who believe that "the end justifies the means".

Now, where have I heard that statement before?
 

Zeets2 » 28 Feb 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:09 am

Where does the law I quoted say ANYTHING about which days they apply?
Or do you normally just make up a comfortable schedule for yourself despite what the law require?

drop boxes are placed for a reason.  People are not required to put ballots in them on a particular day.  Can anyone prove that the woman who dropped ballots off at the CT drop box was not duly designated by the absentee voters to do so?

maineman » 28 Feb 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:13 am

drop boxes are placed for a reason.  People are not required to put ballots in them on a particular day.  Can anyone prove that the woman who dropped ballots off at the CT drop box was not duly designated by the absentee voters to do so?

can you prove she was? sad democrats cheat

maineman » 28 Feb 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:13 am

drop boxes are placed for a reason.  People are not required to put ballots in them on a particular day.  Can anyone prove that the woman who dropped ballots off at the CT drop box was not duly designated by the absentee voters to do so?

You sure are one stubborn liberal, aren't you?  I just showed you WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES!
This has NOTHING to do with the proper lawful use of the drop boxes, no matter how hard you try to divert from the lies you so staunchly stick to, as you purposely avoid the facts.
Ballot harvesting IS ONLY permitted when bringing ballots that are not your own TO THE MUNICIPAL CLERK ACCORDING TO THEIR LEGAL PROCEDURES:
 (4) it is returned by a member of the immediate family of the absentee voter, in person, to said clerk
And THESE are the requirements IF YOU'RE NOT a member of the immediate family:
 A person returning an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk pursuant to subdivision (3) or (4) of this subsection shall present identification and, on the outer envelope of the absentee ballot, sign his name in the presence of the clerk, and indicate his address, his relationship to the voter, and the date and time of such return. “Immediate family” means a dependent relative who resides in the individual's household or any spouse, child or parent of the individual.

So now you've seen the law, making it up to YOU to go find the law that says (as you believe) that any person can drop off any number of completed ballots in the drop boxes.

 

FJB » 28 Feb 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:21 am

can you prove she was? sad democrats cheat

don't need to.  innocence is presumed.  Prove otherwise.

Zeets2 » 28 Feb 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:29 am

You sure are one stubborn liberal, aren't you?  I just showed you WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES!
This has NOTHING to do with the proper lawful use of the drop boxes, no matter how hard you try to divert from the lies you so staunchly stick to, as you purposely avoid the facts.
Ballot harvesting IS ONLY permitted when bringing ballots that are not your own TO THE MUNICIPAL CLERK ACCORDING TO THEIR LEGAL PROCEDURES:
 (4) it is returned by a member of the immediate family of the absentee voter, in person, to said clerk
And THESE are the requirements IF YOU'RE NOT a member of the immediate family:
 A person returning an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk pursuant to subdivision (3) or (4) of this subsection shall present identification and, on the outer envelope of the absentee ballot, sign his name in the presence of the clerk, and indicate his address, his relationship to the voter, and the date and time of such return. “Immediate family” means a dependent relative who resides in the individual's household or any spouse, child or parent of the individual.

So now you've seen the law, making it up to YOU to go find the law that says (as you believe) that any person can drop off any number of completed ballots in the drop boxes.

your citation deals with votes returned by hand to the clerk, not votes put into the mail or put into drop boxes.

Zeets2 » 28 Feb 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:09 am

Where does the law I quoted say ANYTHING about which days they apply?
Or do you normally just make up a comfortable schedule for yourself despite what the law require?
 

I changed my screen name to the 31st parallel to living as eternally separating each great great grandchild from each its 16 great great grandparents lived one at a time also and all points of ancestry between have been evolving as eternally separated so far here now.

You can recite and replay history over and over, but it doesn't change how genetic eternally separated additions occupying time here now.

So what does rule of law enforce socially all the time? Reasonable doubt, context controls the mind, symbolism rules social consensus, and nobody can say what real is without committing a crime against humanity in any alternate reality present.

maineman » 28 Feb 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:34 am

don't need to.  innocence is presumed.  Prove otherwise.

not anymore, you **** like your daughter believe people are guilty until proven innocent

FJB » 28 Feb 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 10:14 am

not anymore, you **** like your daughter believe people are guilty until proven innocent

Every reality has historically denied genetics eternally separates reproductions specifically occupying space limited to ancestrally here now.

Point that finger of blame some more gaming people by reasonable doubt as usual.

31stArrival » 28 Feb 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 10:18 am

Every reality has historically denied genetics eternally separates reproductions specifically occupying space limited to ancestrally here now.

Point that finger of blame some more gaming people by reasonable doubt as usual.

how many **** soks do you have?

FJB » 28 Feb 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 10:26 am

how many **** soks do you have?

I don't wear socks. Character role playing disappears but my genetic time adapting as displaced is always me since a fertilized cell. Who do you believe you became after birth?

My screen name explains how I am me all the time regardless what every franchise of humanity says what I am by context over content conversations between genetic results [pretending they never knew they were uniquely eternally separated now defending alternate realities historically sustaining global chaos, mayhem, madness, misery on anyone not taking sides ignoring now isn't eternity.

History is on my side here, so are self evident genetic results evolving in plain sight pretending humanity saves lives while destroying ancestries inside out tomorrow.

Zeets2 » 28 Feb 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 9:29 am

You sure are one stubborn liberal, aren't you?  I just showed you WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES!
This has NOTHING to do with the proper lawful use of the drop boxes, no matter how hard you try to divert from the lies you so staunchly stick to, as you purposely avoid the facts.
Ballot harvesting IS ONLY permitted when bringing ballots that are not your own TO THE MUNICIPAL CLERK ACCORDING TO THEIR LEGAL PROCEDURES:
 (4) it is returned by a member of the immediate family of the absentee voter, in person, to said clerk
And THESE are the requirements IF YOU'RE NOT a member of the immediate family:
 A person returning an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk pursuant to subdivision (3) or (4) of this subsection shall present identification and, on the outer envelope of the absentee ballot, sign his name in the presence of the clerk, and indicate his address, his relationship to the voter, and the date and time of such return. “Immediate family” means a dependent relative who resides in the individual's household or any spouse, child or parent of the individual.

So now you've seen the law, making it up to YOU to go find the law that says (as you believe) that any person can drop off any number of completed ballots in the drop boxes.

that section applies to people returning a ballot to the municipal clerk only.  not for people who mail their ballots or those who drop their ballots off in drop boxes
 

FJB » 28 Feb 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 10:14 am

not anymore, you **** like your daughter believe people are guilty until proven innocent

call the waaaaaaambulance, ya little homo!