Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Z09 was banned, so what is it doing back so soon?
Z09 was banned, so what is it doing back so soon?
By ActionJackson
24 Feb 2024 9:58 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
25 Feb 2024 10:23 am
@BooRadley is making no effort to hide her identity. A cursory read of a handful of her posts will reveal her in-depth knowledge as to the methods she used to dox me the first time, and her awareness of, and disagreements with the EXACT same positions of mine that @Z09 used to rail about... all after being here for less than a week.Cannonpointer » 25 Feb 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Right, right. I should make this position a full time job - when all I wanted was a decent board to post on that didn't allow doxing.
I have that. This board does not allow doxing. You dox, you get ****-canned.
I'm not. I would not trust your intelligence enough to generate that level of interest.
But, as I said, you don't really CARE if anyone actually DOES DOX anyone else. You just want to be able to claim that the board, as a matter of policy, does not allow it. Put it in the rules and that makes it a fact, even though you readily admit that you have ZERO intention of enforcing those rules and actually go so far as to give would-be doxxers a tutorial on how to rapidly return if someone turns them in and forces you to enact one of your toothless "bans".
On this site, you dox, you get "****-canned", AND you get handed Google maps directions to the back door where you are welcome to come on back in and dox to your heart's content as long as you have the minuscule bit of creativity needed to come up with a new screen name... until someone calls you on it, and then you simply repeat the process. Why bother, if the rule is intentionally so toothless as to be non-existent?
25 Feb 2024 10:26 am
Not enforcing rules?maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ @BooRadley is making no effort to hide her identity. A cursory read of a handful of her posts will reveal her in-depth knowledge as to the methods she used to dox me the first time, and her awareness of, and disagreements with the EXACT same positions of mine that @Z09 used to rail about... all after being here for less than a week.
But, as I said, you don't really CARE if anyone actually DOES DOX anyone else. You just want to be able to claim that the board, as a matter of policy, does not allow it. Put it in the rules and that makes it a fact, even though you readily admit that you have ZERO intention of enforcing those rules and actually go so far as to give would-be doxxers a tutorial on how to rapidly return if someone turns them in and forces you to enact one of your toothless "bans".
On this site, you dox, you get "****-canned", AND you get handed Google maps directions to the back door where you are welcome to come on back in and dox to your heart's content as long as you have the minuscule bit of creativity needed to come up with a new screen name... until someone calls you on it, and then you simply repeat the process. Why bother, if the rule is intentionally so toothless as to be non-existent?
But at the same Biden isn't enforcing our border laws but you're okay with that?
25 Feb 2024 10:32 am
Sir: I have no idea who Z09 is and why she gave you so much grief.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ @BooRadley is making no effort to hide her identity. A cursory read of a handful of her posts will reveal her in-depth knowledge as to the methods she used to dox me the first time, and her awareness of, and disagreements with the EXACT same positions of mine that @Z09 used to rail about... all after being here for less than a week.
But, as I said, you don't really CARE if anyone actually DOES DOX anyone else. You just want to be able to claim that the board, as a matter of policy, does not allow it. Put it in the rules and that makes it a fact, even though you readily admit that you have ZERO intention of enforcing those rules and actually go so far as to give would-be doxxers a tutorial on how to rapidly return if someone turns them in and forces you to enact one of your toothless "bans".
On this site, you dox, you get "****-canned", AND you get handed Google maps directions to the back door where you are welcome to come on back in and dox to your heart's content as long as you have the minuscule bit of creativity needed to come up with a new screen name... until someone calls you on it, and then you simply repeat the process. Why bother, if the rule is intentionally so toothless as to be non-existent?
She disagreed with the same things I do when you bring up a point?
Well, there's tens of millions that diasgree with your positions.
I don't think we should allow millions into this country that do not have jobs and the American taxpayer who is $34 trillion in debt should be paying the bill.
And you're shocked that there's more than one person that agrees with that?
25 Feb 2024 10:33 am
People without common sense need rules to help them navigate thru life.....some still can't do it and then whine about it.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ @BooRadley is making no effort to hide her identity. A cursory read of a handful of her posts will reveal her in-depth knowledge as to the methods she used to dox me the first time, and her awareness of, and disagreements with the EXACT same positions of mine that @Z09 used to rail about... all after being here for less than a week.
But, as I said, you don't really CARE if anyone actually DOES DOX anyone else. You just want to be able to claim that the board, as a matter of policy, does not allow it. Put it in the rules and that makes it a fact, even though you readily admit that you have ZERO intention of enforcing those rules and actually go so far as to give would-be doxxers a tutorial on how to rapidly return if someone turns them in and forces you to enact one of your toothless "bans".
On this site, you dox, you get "****-canned", AND you get handed Google maps directions to the back door where you are welcome to come on back in and dox to your heart's content as long as you have the minuscule bit of creativity needed to come up with a new screen name... until someone calls you on it, and then you simply repeat the process. Why bother, if the rule is intentionally so toothless as to be non-existent?
25 Feb 2024 10:33 am
I don't red cursory - only dewey decimal or alpha-beta.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ @BooRadley is making no effort to hide her identity. A cursory read of a handful of her posts will reveal her in-depth knowledge as to the methods she used to dox me the first time, and her awareness of, and disagreements with the EXACT same positions of mine that @Z09 used to rail about... all after being here for less than a week.
As a matter of policy, this board does not allow doxing.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑
But, as I said, you don't really CARE if anyone actually DOES DOX anyone else. You just want to be able to claim that the board, as a matter of policy, does not allow it.
Can you link me to the tutorial that I gave? I have forgotten all about giving a tutorial, apparently.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Put it in the rules and that makes it a fact, even though you readily admit that you have ZERO intention of enforcing those rules and actually go so far as to give would-be doxxers a tutorial on how to rapidly return if someone turns them in and forces you to enact one of your toothless "bans".
Can you get me a copy of this google maps direction thingy? I don't do tech stuff, but I am excited that apparently I accidentally did some tech stuff. I really would appreciate it if you would send me a copy.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ On this site, you dox, you get "****-canned", AND you get handed Google maps directions to the back door where you are welcome to come on back in and dox to your heart's content as long as you have the minuscule bit of creativity needed to come up with a new screen name... until someone calls you on it, and then you simply repeat the process.
https://i.imgflip.com/3johun.jpg
That's classified, sir.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Why bother, if the rule is intentionally so toothless as to be non-existent?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Feb 2024 10:36 am
HIS identity.
Don't misgender.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Feb 2024 10:36 am
The level of deceit and injustice on this site is awful.
Just awfully I tell you.
I mean, the way we are forced to come here and participate in this nonsense is unbearable!
Just awfully I tell you.
I mean, the way we are forced to come here and participate in this nonsense is unbearable!
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
25 Feb 2024 10:37 am
Well, that's different.....this is a message forum and that's only national security with a sovereign nation hanging by a thread.BooRadley » 25 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Not enforcing rules?
But at the same Biden isn't enforcing our border laws but you're okay with that?
Maineman has prioritized his life concerns, you know.
25 Feb 2024 10:37 am
@Z09 is a waitress in South Boston who does suck some cock for additional income, or so I was told. I also heard that her mother was a crack whore and that @Z09 doesn't have a clue who her actual father is although the story went that he was actually an ilegal Mexican immigrant.Mrkelly » 25 Feb 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ no problem
you are a goofy ****
but Z09 was a stupid **** that couldn’t debate her way out of a paper bag
a couple of guys on here said they hooked up with her to get a blowjob
they said she didn’t stop talking the whole time she sucked their dicks
what an idiot she is
25 Feb 2024 10:39 am
RebelGator » 25 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Well, that's different.....this is a message forum and that's only national security with a sovereign nation hanging by a thread.
Maineman has prioritized his life concerns, you know.
In case you missed it, Biden tried to tighten border security, but the clown and his minions really don't give a **** about solving the problem - they only want to use it as a campaign wedge issue to drive the MAGA morons to the polls.
25 Feb 2024 10:41 am
There you go again....maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ In case you missed it, Biden tried to tighten border security, but the clown and his minions really don't give a **** about solving the problem - they only want to use it as a campaign wedge issue to drive the MAGA morons to the polls.
The bill did not stop illegals...
It just helped border agents process them easier.
Did the bill have anything in it about a wall?
Immediate deportation?
No..
Only got the illegals more beds easier
25 Feb 2024 10:42 am
Biden tried to get more people in faster.....you call that tightening the border, creating a bigger paperwork bureaucracy?maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ In case you missed it, Biden tried to tighten border security, but the clown and his minions really don't give a **** about solving the problem - they only want to use it as a campaign wedge issue to drive the MAGA morons to the polls.
25 Feb 2024 10:42 am
Who told you all these things?maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ @Z09 is a waitress in South Boston who does suck some cock for additional income, or so I was told. I also heard that her mother was a crack whore and that @Z09 doesn't have a clue who her actual father is although the story went that he was actually an ilegal Mexican immigrant.
25 Feb 2024 10:55 am
RebelGator » 25 Feb 2024, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ Biden tried to get more people in faster.....you call that tightening the border, creating a bigger paperwork bureaucracy?
One thing I learned from my days working for politicians is to never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
25 Feb 2024 10:56 am
Well....maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ One thing I learned from my days working for politicians is to never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Biden's doing a perfect job taking care of illegals and not the good people of this country
25 Feb 2024 10:56 am
Sounds like your wife Popeye... from what I've been told.maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ @Z09 is a waitress in South Boston who does suck some cock for additional income, or so I was told. I also heard that her mother was a crack whore and that @Z09 doesn't have a clue who her actual father is although the story went that he was actually an ilegal Mexican immigrant.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
25 Feb 2024 10:58 am
Wow...maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ @Z09 is a waitress in South Boston who does suck some cock for additional income, or so I was told. I also heard that her mother was a crack whore and that @Z09 doesn't have a clue who her actual father is although the story went that he was actually an ilegal Mexican immigrant.
Just last week you blasted someone for misspelling a word.
You spelled illegal incorrectly.
25 Feb 2024 11:00 am
maineman leads such a flamboyant life as a "Globe trotting Jet Setter" that it doesn't make any sense why he would spend so much time at an internet forum bitching about being mistreated..RedheadedStranger » 25 Feb 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ The level of deceit and injustice on this site is awful.
Just awfully I tell you.
I mean, the way we are forced to come here and participate in this nonsense is unbearable!
Most Globe Trotting Jet Setters have much better ways to spend their time.
With all the money he has saved from using Illegal Alien Scab Labor for his personal needs, you would think he could hire Illegal Aliens to run his own Political Forum...?
25 Feb 2024 11:03 am
maineman » 25 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ @Z09 is a waitress in South Boston who does suck some cock for additional income, or so I was told. I also heard that her mother was a crack whore and that @Z09 doesn't have a clue who her actual father is although the story went that he was actually an ilegal Mexican immigrant.
@Mrkelly I just remembered where I heard that from. It was @Z09 herself who admitted her lineage one evening after she had done too many Jager shots after work! Stupid drunken old ****.
25 Feb 2024 11:04 am
The Navy obviously has very high spelling and punctuation standards for their "WARRIORS".....BooRadley » 25 Feb 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ Wow...
Just last week you blasted someone for misspelling a word.
You spelled illegal incorrectly.
Just look at all of those medals...!!!
Who is online
In total there are 9534 users online :: 6 registered, 12 bots, and 9516 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, proximic, curl/7, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, CriteoBot